Cargando…
Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and pred...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501 |
_version_ | 1783614978342780928 |
---|---|
author | Zarraonaindia, Iratxe Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón Liñero, Olaia Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta Aguirre, Mikel Abad, David Baroja-Careaga, Igor de Diego, Alberto Gilbert, Jack A. Estonba, Andone |
author_facet | Zarraonaindia, Iratxe Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón Liñero, Olaia Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta Aguirre, Mikel Abad, David Baroja-Careaga, Igor de Diego, Alberto Gilbert, Jack A. Estonba, Andone |
author_sort | Zarraonaindia, Iratxe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and predicted functional potential. 16S rRNA sequencing was applied to soils from adjacent plots receiving either a synthetic or organic fertilizer, where two crops were grown within treatment, homogenizing for differences in soil properties, crop, and climate. Conventional fertilizer was associated with a decrease in soil pH, an accumulation of Ag, Mn, As, Fe, Co, Cd, and Ni; and an enrichment of ammonia oxidizers and xenobiotic compound degraders (e.g., Candidatus Nitrososphaera, Nitrospira, Bacillus, Pseudomonas). Soils receiving organic fertilization were enriched in Ti (crop biostimulant), N, and C cycling bacteria (denitrifiers, e.g., Azoarcus, Anaerolinea; methylotrophs, e.g., Methylocaldum, Methanosarcina), and disease-suppression (e.g., Myxococcales). Some predicted functions, such as glutathione metabolism, were slightly, but significantly enriched after a one-time manure application, suggesting the enhancement of sulfur regulation, nitrogen-fixing, and defense of environmental stressors. The study highlights that even a single application of organic fertilization is enough to originate a rapid shift in soil prokaryotes, responding to the differential substrate availability by promoting soil health, similar to recurrent applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7694448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76944482020-11-28 Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices Zarraonaindia, Iratxe Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón Liñero, Olaia Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta Aguirre, Mikel Abad, David Baroja-Careaga, Igor de Diego, Alberto Gilbert, Jack A. Estonba, Andone Plants (Basel) Article Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and predicted functional potential. 16S rRNA sequencing was applied to soils from adjacent plots receiving either a synthetic or organic fertilizer, where two crops were grown within treatment, homogenizing for differences in soil properties, crop, and climate. Conventional fertilizer was associated with a decrease in soil pH, an accumulation of Ag, Mn, As, Fe, Co, Cd, and Ni; and an enrichment of ammonia oxidizers and xenobiotic compound degraders (e.g., Candidatus Nitrososphaera, Nitrospira, Bacillus, Pseudomonas). Soils receiving organic fertilization were enriched in Ti (crop biostimulant), N, and C cycling bacteria (denitrifiers, e.g., Azoarcus, Anaerolinea; methylotrophs, e.g., Methylocaldum, Methanosarcina), and disease-suppression (e.g., Myxococcales). Some predicted functions, such as glutathione metabolism, were slightly, but significantly enriched after a one-time manure application, suggesting the enhancement of sulfur regulation, nitrogen-fixing, and defense of environmental stressors. The study highlights that even a single application of organic fertilization is enough to originate a rapid shift in soil prokaryotes, responding to the differential substrate availability by promoting soil health, similar to recurrent applications. MDPI 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7694448/ /pubmed/33171888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zarraonaindia, Iratxe Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón Liñero, Olaia Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta Aguirre, Mikel Abad, David Baroja-Careaga, Igor de Diego, Alberto Gilbert, Jack A. Estonba, Andone Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title | Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title_full | Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title_fullStr | Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title_short | Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices |
title_sort | response of horticultural soil microbiota to different fertilization practices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zarraonaindiairatxe responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT martinezgonixabiersimon responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT lineroolaia responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT munozcolmeneromarta responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT aguirremikel responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT abaddavid responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT barojacareagaigor responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT dediegoalberto responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT gilbertjacka responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices AT estonbaandone responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices |