Cargando…

Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices

Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarraonaindia, Iratxe, Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón, Liñero, Olaia, Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta, Aguirre, Mikel, Abad, David, Baroja-Careaga, Igor, de Diego, Alberto, Gilbert, Jack A., Estonba, Andone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501
_version_ 1783614978342780928
author Zarraonaindia, Iratxe
Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón
Liñero, Olaia
Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta
Aguirre, Mikel
Abad, David
Baroja-Careaga, Igor
de Diego, Alberto
Gilbert, Jack A.
Estonba, Andone
author_facet Zarraonaindia, Iratxe
Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón
Liñero, Olaia
Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta
Aguirre, Mikel
Abad, David
Baroja-Careaga, Igor
de Diego, Alberto
Gilbert, Jack A.
Estonba, Andone
author_sort Zarraonaindia, Iratxe
collection PubMed
description Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and predicted functional potential. 16S rRNA sequencing was applied to soils from adjacent plots receiving either a synthetic or organic fertilizer, where two crops were grown within treatment, homogenizing for differences in soil properties, crop, and climate. Conventional fertilizer was associated with a decrease in soil pH, an accumulation of Ag, Mn, As, Fe, Co, Cd, and Ni; and an enrichment of ammonia oxidizers and xenobiotic compound degraders (e.g., Candidatus Nitrososphaera, Nitrospira, Bacillus, Pseudomonas). Soils receiving organic fertilization were enriched in Ti (crop biostimulant), N, and C cycling bacteria (denitrifiers, e.g., Azoarcus, Anaerolinea; methylotrophs, e.g., Methylocaldum, Methanosarcina), and disease-suppression (e.g., Myxococcales). Some predicted functions, such as glutathione metabolism, were slightly, but significantly enriched after a one-time manure application, suggesting the enhancement of sulfur regulation, nitrogen-fixing, and defense of environmental stressors. The study highlights that even a single application of organic fertilization is enough to originate a rapid shift in soil prokaryotes, responding to the differential substrate availability by promoting soil health, similar to recurrent applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7694448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76944482020-11-28 Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices Zarraonaindia, Iratxe Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón Liñero, Olaia Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta Aguirre, Mikel Abad, David Baroja-Careaga, Igor de Diego, Alberto Gilbert, Jack A. Estonba, Andone Plants (Basel) Article Environmentally friendly agricultural production necessitates manipulation of microbe–plant interactions, requiring a better understanding of how farming practices influence soil microbiota. We studied the effect of conventional and organic treatment on soil bacterial richness, composition, and predicted functional potential. 16S rRNA sequencing was applied to soils from adjacent plots receiving either a synthetic or organic fertilizer, where two crops were grown within treatment, homogenizing for differences in soil properties, crop, and climate. Conventional fertilizer was associated with a decrease in soil pH, an accumulation of Ag, Mn, As, Fe, Co, Cd, and Ni; and an enrichment of ammonia oxidizers and xenobiotic compound degraders (e.g., Candidatus Nitrososphaera, Nitrospira, Bacillus, Pseudomonas). Soils receiving organic fertilization were enriched in Ti (crop biostimulant), N, and C cycling bacteria (denitrifiers, e.g., Azoarcus, Anaerolinea; methylotrophs, e.g., Methylocaldum, Methanosarcina), and disease-suppression (e.g., Myxococcales). Some predicted functions, such as glutathione metabolism, were slightly, but significantly enriched after a one-time manure application, suggesting the enhancement of sulfur regulation, nitrogen-fixing, and defense of environmental stressors. The study highlights that even a single application of organic fertilization is enough to originate a rapid shift in soil prokaryotes, responding to the differential substrate availability by promoting soil health, similar to recurrent applications. MDPI 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7694448/ /pubmed/33171888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zarraonaindia, Iratxe
Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón
Liñero, Olaia
Muñoz-Colmenero, Marta
Aguirre, Mikel
Abad, David
Baroja-Careaga, Igor
de Diego, Alberto
Gilbert, Jack A.
Estonba, Andone
Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title_full Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title_fullStr Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title_full_unstemmed Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title_short Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices
title_sort response of horticultural soil microbiota to different fertilization practices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111501
work_keys_str_mv AT zarraonaindiairatxe responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT martinezgonixabiersimon responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT lineroolaia responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT munozcolmeneromarta responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT aguirremikel responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT abaddavid responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT barojacareagaigor responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT dediegoalberto responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT gilbertjacka responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices
AT estonbaandone responseofhorticulturalsoilmicrobiotatodifferentfertilizationpractices