Cargando…
Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses
CONTEXT: Pancreatic masses are routinely encountered on imaging and often present as a diagnostic dilemma. These masses range from benign inflammatory masses, requiring no intervention to malignant masses, which carry grave prognosis and hence require aggressive management. AIMS: Compare the diagnos...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_437_19 |
_version_ | 1783615038134681600 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Surabhi Puri, Sunil K |
author_facet | Gupta, Surabhi Puri, Sunil K |
author_sort | Gupta, Surabhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Pancreatic masses are routinely encountered on imaging and often present as a diagnostic dilemma. These masses range from benign inflammatory masses, requiring no intervention to malignant masses, which carry grave prognosis and hence require aggressive management. AIMS: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of 256 multislice CT and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in characterization and assessment of resectability of pancreatic masses and compare the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and EUS findings with histopathological findings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 36 patients with pancreatic masses were included who underwent dual phase CT using pancreatic protocol and EUS using 5–13 MHz transducer. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done wherever feasible. Parameters regarding tumor size, location, imaging morphology, and vessel involvement were recorded. Findings were compared with histopathological/operative diagnosis/clinical follow-up. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics with percentages and proportions and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and EUS established diagnosis consistent with tissue diagnosis in 30 (83%) and 22 (61%) patients, respectively. However, the best results were obtained with the combined use of MDCT and EUS. The number of patients categorized as inconclusive by MDCT were lower compared to EUS. Assessing resectability for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, MDCT showed specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% compared to EUS, which had specificity and PPV of 75% and 92.3%, respectively. MDCT is the first-line imaging modality in detection, characterization of pancreatic masses, and assessment of resectability in malignant neoplasms. EUS is beneficial in the detection of masses <2 cm in size causing pancreatic contour deformity on CT, for guiding FNAC. MDCT and EUS with EUS-guided FNA are complementary not competitive tools in preoperative imaging of pancreatic masses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7694713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76947132020-12-02 Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses Gupta, Surabhi Puri, Sunil K Indian J Radiol Imaging Git Imaging CONTEXT: Pancreatic masses are routinely encountered on imaging and often present as a diagnostic dilemma. These masses range from benign inflammatory masses, requiring no intervention to malignant masses, which carry grave prognosis and hence require aggressive management. AIMS: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of 256 multislice CT and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in characterization and assessment of resectability of pancreatic masses and compare the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and EUS findings with histopathological findings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 36 patients with pancreatic masses were included who underwent dual phase CT using pancreatic protocol and EUS using 5–13 MHz transducer. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was done wherever feasible. Parameters regarding tumor size, location, imaging morphology, and vessel involvement were recorded. Findings were compared with histopathological/operative diagnosis/clinical follow-up. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics with percentages and proportions and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and EUS established diagnosis consistent with tissue diagnosis in 30 (83%) and 22 (61%) patients, respectively. However, the best results were obtained with the combined use of MDCT and EUS. The number of patients categorized as inconclusive by MDCT were lower compared to EUS. Assessing resectability for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, MDCT showed specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% compared to EUS, which had specificity and PPV of 75% and 92.3%, respectively. MDCT is the first-line imaging modality in detection, characterization of pancreatic masses, and assessment of resectability in malignant neoplasms. EUS is beneficial in the detection of masses <2 cm in size causing pancreatic contour deformity on CT, for guiding FNAC. MDCT and EUS with EUS-guided FNA are complementary not competitive tools in preoperative imaging of pancreatic masses. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7694713/ /pubmed/33273763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_437_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Git Imaging Gupta, Surabhi Puri, Sunil K Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title | Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title_full | Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title_short | Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
title_sort | comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice ct and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses |
topic | Git Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_437_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptasurabhi comparativeanalysisandassessmentofdiagnosticaccuracyof256slicectandendoscopicultrasoundinevaluationofpancreaticmasses AT purisunilk comparativeanalysisandassessmentofdiagnosticaccuracyof256slicectandendoscopicultrasoundinevaluationofpancreaticmasses |