Cargando…

Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qutbi, Mohsen, Soltanshahi, Mehdi, Shiravand, Yaser, Gorzi, Saba Karami, Shafiei, Babak, Asli, Isa Neshandar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19
_version_ 1783615043054600192
author Qutbi, Mohsen
Soltanshahi, Mehdi
Shiravand, Yaser
Gorzi, Saba Karami
Shafiei, Babak
Asli, Isa Neshandar
author_facet Qutbi, Mohsen
Soltanshahi, Mehdi
Shiravand, Yaser
Gorzi, Saba Karami
Shafiei, Babak
Asli, Isa Neshandar
author_sort Qutbi, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiate the overlapped soft tissue and bony structures, by creating two different attenuation profiles. Procedural guidelines are available to technicians and physicians to guarantee the best practice, including consistent positioning during scanning and standard reporting. However, similar to other imaging modalities, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry may be influenced by technical errors, and thus, imaging artifacts may arise and accuracy and precision of the results may be influenced. This issue may, in turn, affect the final result and interpretation. Hence, the article is arranged with the intention of presenting some less common and rare technical and patient-related sources of error and resultant artifacts, from poor patient preparation to acquisition and data processing. Where appropriate, the corresponding tables of densitometric results (bone mineral density) and statistical parameters (T- and Z-scores) are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7694734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76947342020-12-02 Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review Qutbi, Mohsen Soltanshahi, Mehdi Shiravand, Yaser Gorzi, Saba Karami Shafiei, Babak Asli, Isa Neshandar Indian J Radiol Imaging Miscellaneous Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiate the overlapped soft tissue and bony structures, by creating two different attenuation profiles. Procedural guidelines are available to technicians and physicians to guarantee the best practice, including consistent positioning during scanning and standard reporting. However, similar to other imaging modalities, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry may be influenced by technical errors, and thus, imaging artifacts may arise and accuracy and precision of the results may be influenced. This issue may, in turn, affect the final result and interpretation. Hence, the article is arranged with the intention of presenting some less common and rare technical and patient-related sources of error and resultant artifacts, from poor patient preparation to acquisition and data processing. Where appropriate, the corresponding tables of densitometric results (bone mineral density) and statistical parameters (T- and Z-scores) are provided. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7694734/ /pubmed/33273771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Miscellaneous
Qutbi, Mohsen
Soltanshahi, Mehdi
Shiravand, Yaser
Gorzi, Saba Karami
Shafiei, Babak
Asli, Isa Neshandar
Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title_full Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title_fullStr Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title_full_unstemmed Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title_short Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
title_sort technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a pictorial review
topic Miscellaneous
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19
work_keys_str_mv AT qutbimohsen technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview
AT soltanshahimehdi technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview
AT shiravandyaser technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview
AT gorzisabakarami technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview
AT shafieibabak technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview
AT asliisaneshandar technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview