Cargando…
Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19 |
_version_ | 1783615043054600192 |
---|---|
author | Qutbi, Mohsen Soltanshahi, Mehdi Shiravand, Yaser Gorzi, Saba Karami Shafiei, Babak Asli, Isa Neshandar |
author_facet | Qutbi, Mohsen Soltanshahi, Mehdi Shiravand, Yaser Gorzi, Saba Karami Shafiei, Babak Asli, Isa Neshandar |
author_sort | Qutbi, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiate the overlapped soft tissue and bony structures, by creating two different attenuation profiles. Procedural guidelines are available to technicians and physicians to guarantee the best practice, including consistent positioning during scanning and standard reporting. However, similar to other imaging modalities, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry may be influenced by technical errors, and thus, imaging artifacts may arise and accuracy and precision of the results may be influenced. This issue may, in turn, affect the final result and interpretation. Hence, the article is arranged with the intention of presenting some less common and rare technical and patient-related sources of error and resultant artifacts, from poor patient preparation to acquisition and data processing. Where appropriate, the corresponding tables of densitometric results (bone mineral density) and statistical parameters (T- and Z-scores) are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7694734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76947342020-12-02 Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review Qutbi, Mohsen Soltanshahi, Mehdi Shiravand, Yaser Gorzi, Saba Karami Shafiei, Babak Asli, Isa Neshandar Indian J Radiol Imaging Miscellaneous Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the standard and validated tool for measurement of bone mineral density and for the evaluation of osteoporosis. Current densitometry scanners based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method produce two X-ray beams with different energies to differentiate the overlapped soft tissue and bony structures, by creating two different attenuation profiles. Procedural guidelines are available to technicians and physicians to guarantee the best practice, including consistent positioning during scanning and standard reporting. However, similar to other imaging modalities, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry may be influenced by technical errors, and thus, imaging artifacts may arise and accuracy and precision of the results may be influenced. This issue may, in turn, affect the final result and interpretation. Hence, the article is arranged with the intention of presenting some less common and rare technical and patient-related sources of error and resultant artifacts, from poor patient preparation to acquisition and data processing. Where appropriate, the corresponding tables of densitometric results (bone mineral density) and statistical parameters (T- and Z-scores) are provided. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7694734/ /pubmed/33273771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Miscellaneous Qutbi, Mohsen Soltanshahi, Mehdi Shiravand, Yaser Gorzi, Saba Karami Shafiei, Babak Asli, Isa Neshandar Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title | Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title_full | Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title_fullStr | Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title_short | Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review |
title_sort | technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a pictorial review |
topic | Miscellaneous |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273771 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_495_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qutbimohsen technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview AT soltanshahimehdi technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview AT shiravandyaser technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview AT gorzisabakarami technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview AT shafieibabak technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview AT asliisaneshandar technicalandpatientrelatedsourcesoferrorandartifactsinbonemineraldensitometryusingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryapictorialreview |