Cargando…

Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses

BACKGROUND: Difficulty in detection of silent carriers of Streptococcus equi is a key reason for its continued spread to immunologically naïve groups of horses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical examination, markers of inflammation, or serology differentiate silent carriers of S. equi in reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pringle, John, Venner, Monica, Tscheschlok, Lisa, Waller, Andrew S., Riihimäki, Miia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15939
_version_ 1783615061523169280
author Pringle, John
Venner, Monica
Tscheschlok, Lisa
Waller, Andrew S.
Riihimäki, Miia
author_facet Pringle, John
Venner, Monica
Tscheschlok, Lisa
Waller, Andrew S.
Riihimäki, Miia
author_sort Pringle, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Difficulty in detection of silent carriers of Streptococcus equi is a key reason for its continued spread to immunologically naïve groups of horses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical examination, markers of inflammation, or serology differentiate silent carriers of S. equi in recovered comingled horses. ANIMALS: Ninety‐eight warmblood yearlings and 72 unaffected mares on a large breeding farm (outbreak A), 38 mature Icelandic horses at a riding stable (outbreak B), and 27 mixed breed horses at a boarding stable (outbreak C). METHODS: Prospective observational study 6 months to 2 years after strangles outbreaks. Carriers were defined as any animal positive on culture or qPCR to S. equi from nasopharyngeal lavage or guttural pouch endoscopy and lavage. Most horses had complete physical exams and 1 group included evaluation of white blood cell counts and serum amyloid A. Sera from all horses was tested for antibodies to antigens A and C of S. equi using an enhanced indirect ELISA. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Data were compared using paired t tests, Wilcoxon ranked test, chi square, or the Fishers exact test. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Apart from weanlings at 6 months in outbreak A, there was no significant association between any clinical markers or serology with carrier state (P = .06‐1). Moreover, 3/12 culture positive carriers were seronegative to S. equi. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Silent carriers of S. equi do not differ clinically or on markers of inflammation to their noncarrier herd‐mates. Moreover, serology alone will not distinguish carriers in comingled horses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7694814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76948142020-12-07 Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses Pringle, John Venner, Monica Tscheschlok, Lisa Waller, Andrew S. Riihimäki, Miia J Vet Intern Med EQUINE BACKGROUND: Difficulty in detection of silent carriers of Streptococcus equi is a key reason for its continued spread to immunologically naïve groups of horses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical examination, markers of inflammation, or serology differentiate silent carriers of S. equi in recovered comingled horses. ANIMALS: Ninety‐eight warmblood yearlings and 72 unaffected mares on a large breeding farm (outbreak A), 38 mature Icelandic horses at a riding stable (outbreak B), and 27 mixed breed horses at a boarding stable (outbreak C). METHODS: Prospective observational study 6 months to 2 years after strangles outbreaks. Carriers were defined as any animal positive on culture or qPCR to S. equi from nasopharyngeal lavage or guttural pouch endoscopy and lavage. Most horses had complete physical exams and 1 group included evaluation of white blood cell counts and serum amyloid A. Sera from all horses was tested for antibodies to antigens A and C of S. equi using an enhanced indirect ELISA. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Data were compared using paired t tests, Wilcoxon ranked test, chi square, or the Fishers exact test. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Apart from weanlings at 6 months in outbreak A, there was no significant association between any clinical markers or serology with carrier state (P = .06‐1). Moreover, 3/12 culture positive carriers were seronegative to S. equi. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Silent carriers of S. equi do not differ clinically or on markers of inflammation to their noncarrier herd‐mates. Moreover, serology alone will not distinguish carriers in comingled horses. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-10-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7694814/ /pubmed/33074578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15939 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle EQUINE
Pringle, John
Venner, Monica
Tscheschlok, Lisa
Waller, Andrew S.
Riihimäki, Miia
Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title_full Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title_fullStr Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title_full_unstemmed Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title_short Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
title_sort markers of long term silent carriers of streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses
topic EQUINE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15939
work_keys_str_mv AT pringlejohn markersoflongtermsilentcarriersofstreptococcusequisspequiinhorses
AT vennermonica markersoflongtermsilentcarriersofstreptococcusequisspequiinhorses
AT tscheschloklisa markersoflongtermsilentcarriersofstreptococcusequisspequiinhorses
AT wallerandrews markersoflongtermsilentcarriersofstreptococcusequisspequiinhorses
AT riihimakimiia markersoflongtermsilentcarriersofstreptococcusequisspequiinhorses