Cargando…
Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Strength training is a key factor for soccer players, but at amateur levels, it is difficult to apply due to the lack of infrastructure and short training time. In this regard, high-intensity resistance circuit-based training could be a suitable method to solve these issues. Circuit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology9110383 |
_version_ | 1783615138759180288 |
---|---|
author | Marín-Pagán, Cristian Blazevich, Anthony J. Chung, Linda H. Romero-Arenas, Salvador Freitas, Tomás T. Alcaraz, Pedro E. |
author_facet | Marín-Pagán, Cristian Blazevich, Anthony J. Chung, Linda H. Romero-Arenas, Salvador Freitas, Tomás T. Alcaraz, Pedro E. |
author_sort | Marín-Pagán, Cristian |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Strength training is a key factor for soccer players, but at amateur levels, it is difficult to apply due to the lack of infrastructure and short training time. In this regard, high-intensity resistance circuit-based training could be a suitable method to solve these issues. Circuit training can improve the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses while reducing training time by 66%. The effects of circuit training could contribute to improving aerobic fitness and body composition in soccer players. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses induced by high-intensity resistance circuit-based (HRC) and traditional strength (TS) training protocols. Ten amateur soccer players reported to the laboratory on four occasions: (1) protocol familiarization and load determination; (2) maximal oxygen consumption test; (3) and (4) resistance training protocols (HRC and TS), completed in a cross-over randomized order. In both protocols, the same structure was used (two blocks of 3 sets × 3 exercises, separated by a 5-min rest), with only the time between consecutive exercises differing: TS (3 min) and HRC (~35 s, allowing 3 min of local recovery). To test for between-protocol differences, paired t-tests were applied. Results showed that oxygen consumption and heart rate during HRC were 75% and 39% higher than TS, respectively (p < 0.001). After the training sessions, blood lactate concentration at 1.5, 5 and 7 min and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption were higher in HRC. The respiratory exchange ratio was 6.7% greater during HRC, with no between-group differences found post-exercise. The energy cost of HRC was ~66% higher than TS. In conclusion, HRC training induces greater cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses in soccer players and thus may be a time-effective training strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7695212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76952122020-11-28 Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players Marín-Pagán, Cristian Blazevich, Anthony J. Chung, Linda H. Romero-Arenas, Salvador Freitas, Tomás T. Alcaraz, Pedro E. Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Strength training is a key factor for soccer players, but at amateur levels, it is difficult to apply due to the lack of infrastructure and short training time. In this regard, high-intensity resistance circuit-based training could be a suitable method to solve these issues. Circuit training can improve the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses while reducing training time by 66%. The effects of circuit training could contribute to improving aerobic fitness and body composition in soccer players. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses induced by high-intensity resistance circuit-based (HRC) and traditional strength (TS) training protocols. Ten amateur soccer players reported to the laboratory on four occasions: (1) protocol familiarization and load determination; (2) maximal oxygen consumption test; (3) and (4) resistance training protocols (HRC and TS), completed in a cross-over randomized order. In both protocols, the same structure was used (two blocks of 3 sets × 3 exercises, separated by a 5-min rest), with only the time between consecutive exercises differing: TS (3 min) and HRC (~35 s, allowing 3 min of local recovery). To test for between-protocol differences, paired t-tests were applied. Results showed that oxygen consumption and heart rate during HRC were 75% and 39% higher than TS, respectively (p < 0.001). After the training sessions, blood lactate concentration at 1.5, 5 and 7 min and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption were higher in HRC. The respiratory exchange ratio was 6.7% greater during HRC, with no between-group differences found post-exercise. The energy cost of HRC was ~66% higher than TS. In conclusion, HRC training induces greater cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses in soccer players and thus may be a time-effective training strategy. MDPI 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7695212/ /pubmed/33171830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology9110383 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marín-Pagán, Cristian Blazevich, Anthony J. Chung, Linda H. Romero-Arenas, Salvador Freitas, Tomás T. Alcaraz, Pedro E. Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title | Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title_full | Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title_fullStr | Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title_short | Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players |
title_sort | acute physiological responses to high-intensity resistance circuit training vs. traditional strength training in soccer players |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology9110383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinpagancristian acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers AT blazevichanthonyj acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers AT chunglindah acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers AT romeroarenassalvador acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers AT freitastomast acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers AT alcarazpedroe acutephysiologicalresponsestohighintensityresistancecircuittrainingvstraditionalstrengthtraininginsoccerplayers |