Cargando…

Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI

Purpose: There is still no definite method to determine therapeutic response in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). We analyzed the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for assessing therapeutic response in PVO. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Ikchan, Kong, Eunjung, Kim, Sang Woo, Cho, Ihn Ho, Hong, Cheol Pyo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110916
_version_ 1783615148653543424
author Jeon, Ikchan
Kong, Eunjung
Kim, Sang Woo
Cho, Ihn Ho
Hong, Cheol Pyo
author_facet Jeon, Ikchan
Kong, Eunjung
Kim, Sang Woo
Cho, Ihn Ho
Hong, Cheol Pyo
author_sort Jeon, Ikchan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: There is still no definite method to determine therapeutic response in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). We analyzed the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for assessing therapeutic response in PVO. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients (32 men and 21 women) with lumbar PVO. The results of clinical assessments for therapeutic response were divided into “Cured” (group C) and “Non-cured” (group NC). The differences in clinical and radiological features of PVO lesions between the two groups were analyzed using clinical data and simultaneous FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained at each clinical assessment. Results: Clinical assessments and FDG-PET/MRIs were performed at 41.89 ± 16.08 (21–91) days of parenteral antibiotic therapy. There were 39 patients in group C and 14 in group NC. Diagnostic accuracies (DAs) of FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and C-reactive protein (CRP) for residual PVO were as follows (p < 0.01): 84.9% of the maximum standardized uptake value of PVO lesion (PvoSUV(max)), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV(max)−NmlSUV(max) (SUV(max) of normal vertebra), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV(max)−NmlSUV(mean) (SUV(mean) of normal vertebra), and 71.7% of CRP. DAs were better (92.5–94.3%) when applying FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and CRP together. Under the FDG uptake distribution-based interpretation, FDG uptake was significantly limited to intervertebral structures in group C (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The interpretations of intensity and distribution of FDG uptake on FDG-PET are useful for detecting residual PVO in the assessment of therapeutic response of PVO. The combination of FDG-PET and CRP is expected to increase DA for detecting residual PVO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7695264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76952642020-11-28 Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI Jeon, Ikchan Kong, Eunjung Kim, Sang Woo Cho, Ihn Ho Hong, Cheol Pyo Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose: There is still no definite method to determine therapeutic response in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). We analyzed the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for assessing therapeutic response in PVO. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients (32 men and 21 women) with lumbar PVO. The results of clinical assessments for therapeutic response were divided into “Cured” (group C) and “Non-cured” (group NC). The differences in clinical and radiological features of PVO lesions between the two groups were analyzed using clinical data and simultaneous FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained at each clinical assessment. Results: Clinical assessments and FDG-PET/MRIs were performed at 41.89 ± 16.08 (21–91) days of parenteral antibiotic therapy. There were 39 patients in group C and 14 in group NC. Diagnostic accuracies (DAs) of FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and C-reactive protein (CRP) for residual PVO were as follows (p < 0.01): 84.9% of the maximum standardized uptake value of PVO lesion (PvoSUV(max)), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV(max)−NmlSUV(max) (SUV(max) of normal vertebra), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV(max)−NmlSUV(mean) (SUV(mean) of normal vertebra), and 71.7% of CRP. DAs were better (92.5–94.3%) when applying FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and CRP together. Under the FDG uptake distribution-based interpretation, FDG uptake was significantly limited to intervertebral structures in group C (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The interpretations of intensity and distribution of FDG uptake on FDG-PET are useful for detecting residual PVO in the assessment of therapeutic response of PVO. The combination of FDG-PET and CRP is expected to increase DA for detecting residual PVO. MDPI 2020-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7695264/ /pubmed/33171659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110916 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jeon, Ikchan
Kong, Eunjung
Kim, Sang Woo
Cho, Ihn Ho
Hong, Cheol Pyo
Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title_full Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title_fullStr Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title_short Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using (18)F-FDG-PET/MRI
title_sort assessment of therapeutic response in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis using (18)f-fdg-pet/mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33171659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110916
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonikchan assessmentoftherapeuticresponseinpyogenicvertebralosteomyelitisusing18ffdgpetmri
AT kongeunjung assessmentoftherapeuticresponseinpyogenicvertebralosteomyelitisusing18ffdgpetmri
AT kimsangwoo assessmentoftherapeuticresponseinpyogenicvertebralosteomyelitisusing18ffdgpetmri
AT choihnho assessmentoftherapeuticresponseinpyogenicvertebralosteomyelitisusing18ffdgpetmri
AT hongcheolpyo assessmentoftherapeuticresponseinpyogenicvertebralosteomyelitisusing18ffdgpetmri