Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience
Background and study aims Traditionally in the case of a vascular interposition, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been contraindicated. A transvascular route (TV) is feasible and probably a safe alternative approach in selected patients, but data are scarce. The pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1288-0030 |
_version_ | 1783615205008211968 |
---|---|
author | Garcia-Sumalla, Albert Subtil, Jose C. de la Serna, Carlos Maisterra, Sandra Aparicio, Jose Ramon Bojorquez, Alejandro Enrique Montañes, Rafael Leon Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Gornals, Joan B. |
author_facet | Garcia-Sumalla, Albert Subtil, Jose C. de la Serna, Carlos Maisterra, Sandra Aparicio, Jose Ramon Bojorquez, Alejandro Enrique Montañes, Rafael Leon Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Gornals, Joan B. |
author_sort | Garcia-Sumalla, Albert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Traditionally in the case of a vascular interposition, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been contraindicated. A transvascular route (TV) is feasible and probably a safe alternative approach in selected patients, but data are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-TV-FNA in thoracic and abdominal lesions. Secondary aims included evaluation of the clinical impact and technical aspects. Patients and methods A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with inclusion of all consecutive patients that underwent EUS-TV-FNA from July 2007 to January 2020. Feasibility, cytopathology, procedure details, and safety were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with incidents, cytopathological diagnosis, and clinical impact. Results Data were collected from a total of 49 cases and 50 EUS-TV-FNAs. The aorta (n = 19) and portal system (n = 17) were the most frequently punctured. The most frequent lesions were mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 13) and pancreatic tumors (n = 11). The diagnostic yield was 86 %, and there were nondiagnostic samples in seven cases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88 % (95 %CI,0.74–0.96), 100 % (95 %CI,0.59–1), and 90 % (95 %CI,0.78–0.96), respectively. Only three incidents were detected: two mural hematomas and a self-limited bleeding of gastroduodenal artery. In most patients, there was a significant impact on clinical management (88 %). Arterial vessel and ASA-III had a trend with incidents (both, P < 0.08). Rapid on-site evlauation was found to be an independent predictor for obtaining a conclusive sample (OR 6.2; 95 %CI, 1.06–36.73, P < 0.04). Conclusions EUS-TV-FNA is feasible, seems to be safe, and can be recommended when no other targets are available, and the information obtained would impact on the clinical plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7695512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76955122020-12-01 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience Garcia-Sumalla, Albert Subtil, Jose C. de la Serna, Carlos Maisterra, Sandra Aparicio, Jose Ramon Bojorquez, Alejandro Enrique Montañes, Rafael Leon Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Gornals, Joan B. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Traditionally in the case of a vascular interposition, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been contraindicated. A transvascular route (TV) is feasible and probably a safe alternative approach in selected patients, but data are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-TV-FNA in thoracic and abdominal lesions. Secondary aims included evaluation of the clinical impact and technical aspects. Patients and methods A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with inclusion of all consecutive patients that underwent EUS-TV-FNA from July 2007 to January 2020. Feasibility, cytopathology, procedure details, and safety were evaluated. Univariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with incidents, cytopathological diagnosis, and clinical impact. Results Data were collected from a total of 49 cases and 50 EUS-TV-FNAs. The aorta (n = 19) and portal system (n = 17) were the most frequently punctured. The most frequent lesions were mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 13) and pancreatic tumors (n = 11). The diagnostic yield was 86 %, and there were nondiagnostic samples in seven cases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88 % (95 %CI,0.74–0.96), 100 % (95 %CI,0.59–1), and 90 % (95 %CI,0.78–0.96), respectively. Only three incidents were detected: two mural hematomas and a self-limited bleeding of gastroduodenal artery. In most patients, there was a significant impact on clinical management (88 %). Arterial vessel and ASA-III had a trend with incidents (both, P < 0.08). Rapid on-site evlauation was found to be an independent predictor for obtaining a conclusive sample (OR 6.2; 95 %CI, 1.06–36.73, P < 0.04). Conclusions EUS-TV-FNA is feasible, seems to be safe, and can be recommended when no other targets are available, and the information obtained would impact on the clinical plan. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-12 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7695512/ /pubmed/33269327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1288-0030 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Garcia-Sumalla, Albert Subtil, Jose C. de la Serna, Carlos Maisterra, Sandra Aparicio, Jose Ramon Bojorquez, Alejandro Enrique Montañes, Rafael Leon Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique Gornals, Joan B. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title_full | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title_short | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound-guided transvascular needle biopsy of thoracic and abdominal lesions: a multicenter experience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1288-0030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciasumallaalbert endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT subtiljosec endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT delasernacarlos endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT maisterrasandra endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT apariciojoseramon endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT bojorquezalejandroenrique endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT montanesrafaelleon endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT vazquezsequeirosenrique endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience AT gornalsjoanb endoscopicultrasoundguidedtransvascularneedlebiopsyofthoracicandabdominallesionsamulticenterexperience |