Cargando…

High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?

INTRODUCTION: Gout is commonly associated with low adherence rates, thus limiting the effectiveness of treatment. Nevertheless, informed and empowered patients may be more likely to achieve high adherence. We intend to demonstrate that adherence in clinical practice may reach that achieved in clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez-Ruiz, Fernando, Perez-Herrero, Nuria, Richette, Pascal, Stack, Austin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00249-w
_version_ 1783615260572254208
author Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Perez-Herrero, Nuria
Richette, Pascal
Stack, Austin G.
author_facet Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Perez-Herrero, Nuria
Richette, Pascal
Stack, Austin G.
author_sort Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gout is commonly associated with low adherence rates, thus limiting the effectiveness of treatment. Nevertheless, informed and empowered patients may be more likely to achieve high adherence. We intend to demonstrate that adherence in clinical practice may reach that achieved in clinical trials. METHODS: This was a transversal study within an inception cohort of patients with gout prospectively followed up. Patients were informed at entrance in the cohort of outcomes, targets, and means to implement for successful treatment. Adherence was evaluated through electronic medication possession ratio (MPR) for urate-lowering medication and oral medications for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia for comparison. Factors associated with nonadherence, and the relation between nonadherence and serum urate levels while on treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were retrieved from 336 patients, who showed a mean MPR of 87.5%, with 82.1% of patients showing MPR ≥ 0.8. Rates of adherence for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were quite similar (88%, 87%, and 83%, respectively), although MPR > 0.8 was significantly lower for oral medications for diabetes. Adherence was lower, but nevertheless quite fair, during the first year of follow-up, and increasing over time. Active follow-up and comorbidity were associated with good adherence, and adherence and long-term follow-up were associated with higher rates of achieving serum urate within therapeutic target. CONCLUSION: Patients with gout show high rates of adherence if empowered. Active follow-up and comorbidity are associated with high rates of adherence. Adherence is strongly associated with higher rates of achievement of therapeutic serum urate target.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7695758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76957582020-11-30 High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame? Perez-Ruiz, Fernando Perez-Herrero, Nuria Richette, Pascal Stack, Austin G. Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Gout is commonly associated with low adherence rates, thus limiting the effectiveness of treatment. Nevertheless, informed and empowered patients may be more likely to achieve high adherence. We intend to demonstrate that adherence in clinical practice may reach that achieved in clinical trials. METHODS: This was a transversal study within an inception cohort of patients with gout prospectively followed up. Patients were informed at entrance in the cohort of outcomes, targets, and means to implement for successful treatment. Adherence was evaluated through electronic medication possession ratio (MPR) for urate-lowering medication and oral medications for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia for comparison. Factors associated with nonadherence, and the relation between nonadherence and serum urate levels while on treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were retrieved from 336 patients, who showed a mean MPR of 87.5%, with 82.1% of patients showing MPR ≥ 0.8. Rates of adherence for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes were quite similar (88%, 87%, and 83%, respectively), although MPR > 0.8 was significantly lower for oral medications for diabetes. Adherence was lower, but nevertheless quite fair, during the first year of follow-up, and increasing over time. Active follow-up and comorbidity were associated with good adherence, and adherence and long-term follow-up were associated with higher rates of achieving serum urate within therapeutic target. CONCLUSION: Patients with gout show high rates of adherence if empowered. Active follow-up and comorbidity are associated with high rates of adherence. Adherence is strongly associated with higher rates of achievement of therapeutic serum urate target. Springer Healthcare 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7695758/ /pubmed/33111171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00249-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Perez-Herrero, Nuria
Richette, Pascal
Stack, Austin G.
High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title_full High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title_fullStr High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title_full_unstemmed High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title_short High Rate of Adherence to Urate-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Gout: Who’s to Blame?
title_sort high rate of adherence to urate-lowering treatment in patients with gout: who’s to blame?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00249-w
work_keys_str_mv AT perezruizfernando highrateofadherencetourateloweringtreatmentinpatientswithgoutwhostoblame
AT perezherreronuria highrateofadherencetourateloweringtreatmentinpatientswithgoutwhostoblame
AT richettepascal highrateofadherencetourateloweringtreatmentinpatientswithgoutwhostoblame
AT stackausting highrateofadherencetourateloweringtreatmentinpatientswithgoutwhostoblame