Cargando…
Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle
Cattle of different ages may have to be killed on farm for purposes other than slaughter (the latter being defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale, e.g. for economic reasons or for disease control. The purpose of this scientific opinion is to assess the risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312235 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6312 |
_version_ | 1783615309099302912 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Candiani, Denise Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Candiani, Denise Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cattle of different ages may have to be killed on farm for purposes other than slaughter (the latter being defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale, e.g. for economic reasons or for disease control. The purpose of this scientific opinion is to assess the risks associated with the on‐farm killing of cattle. The processes during on‐farm killing that were assessed included handling and moving, stunning and/or killing methods (including restraint). The killing methods were grouped into mechanical and electrical methods as well as lethal injection. In total, 21 hazards compromising animal welfare were identified and characterised, most of these related to stunning and/or killing. Staff was identified as an origin for all hazards, either due to lack of appropriate skills needed to perform tasks or due to fatigue. Possible preventive and corrective measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for 19 hazards, and the staff was shown to have a crucial role in prevention. Three welfare consequences of hazards to which cattle can be exposed during on‐farm killing were identified: impeded movement, pain and fear. The welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures related to these were described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal‐based measures, origins of the hazards, preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise the welfare consequences are proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7696001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76960012020-12-10 Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Candiani, Denise Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion Cattle of different ages may have to be killed on farm for purposes other than slaughter (the latter being defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale, e.g. for economic reasons or for disease control. The purpose of this scientific opinion is to assess the risks associated with the on‐farm killing of cattle. The processes during on‐farm killing that were assessed included handling and moving, stunning and/or killing methods (including restraint). The killing methods were grouped into mechanical and electrical methods as well as lethal injection. In total, 21 hazards compromising animal welfare were identified and characterised, most of these related to stunning and/or killing. Staff was identified as an origin for all hazards, either due to lack of appropriate skills needed to perform tasks or due to fatigue. Possible preventive and corrective measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for 19 hazards, and the staff was shown to have a crucial role in prevention. Three welfare consequences of hazards to which cattle can be exposed during on‐farm killing were identified: impeded movement, pain and fear. The welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures related to these were described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal‐based measures, origins of the hazards, preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise the welfare consequences are proposed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7696001/ /pubmed/33312235 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6312 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Candiani, Denise Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title | Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title_full | Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title_fullStr | Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title_short | Welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
title_sort | welfare of cattle during killing for purposes other than slaughter on‐farm killing of cattle |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312235 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT nielsensørensaxmose welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT alvarezjulio welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT bicoutdominiquejoseph welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT calistripaolo welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT depnerklaus welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT drewejulianashley welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT garinbastujibruno welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT gortazarschmidtchristian welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT herskinmette welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT michelvirginie welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT mirandachuecamiguelangel welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT robertshelenclare welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT sihvonenliisahelena welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT spoolderhans welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT stahlkarl welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT velardeantonio welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT viltroparvo welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT candianidenise welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT vanderstedeyves welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle AT wincklerchristoph welfareofcattleduringkillingforpurposesotherthanslaughteronfarmkillingofcattle |