Cargando…

A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies

BACKGROUND: Person‐centred care (PCC) has been suggested as a potential means to improve the care of patients with chronic and long‐term disorders. In this regard, a model for PCC was developed by the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person‐Centred Care (GPCC). OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gyllensten, Hanna, Björkman, Ida, Jakobsson Ung, Eva, Ekman, Inger, Jakobsson, Sofie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13120
_version_ 1783615342276247552
author Gyllensten, Hanna
Björkman, Ida
Jakobsson Ung, Eva
Ekman, Inger
Jakobsson, Sofie
author_facet Gyllensten, Hanna
Björkman, Ida
Jakobsson Ung, Eva
Ekman, Inger
Jakobsson, Sofie
author_sort Gyllensten, Hanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Person‐centred care (PCC) has been suggested as a potential means to improve the care of patients with chronic and long‐term disorders. In this regard, a model for PCC was developed by the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person‐Centred Care (GPCC). OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore the theoretical frameworks, designs, contexts and intervention characteristics in the first 27 interventional studies conducted based on the ethics for person‐centredness provided by the GPCC. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A questionnaire to the principal investigators of the 27 intervention studies financed by the GPCC and conducted between 2010 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Theoretical frameworks, contexts of studies, person‐centred ethic, and outcome measures. RESULTS: Most of the interventions were based on the same ethical assumptions for person‐centredness but theories and models in applying the interventions differed. All studies were controlled; 12 randomized and 15 quasi‐experimental. Hospital in‐ and outpatient and primary care settings were represented and the outcome measures were related to the specific theories used. A complexity in designing, introducing and evaluating PCC interventions was evident. CONCLUSION: The frameworks, designs and interventions in the studies were in line with the established ethical basis of PCC, whereas outcome measures varied widely. Consensus discussions among researchers in the field are needed to make comparisons between studies feasible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: Patients or the public made no direct contributions, although most of the studied projects included such initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7696144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76961442020-12-10 A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies Gyllensten, Hanna Björkman, Ida Jakobsson Ung, Eva Ekman, Inger Jakobsson, Sofie Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Person‐centred care (PCC) has been suggested as a potential means to improve the care of patients with chronic and long‐term disorders. In this regard, a model for PCC was developed by the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person‐Centred Care (GPCC). OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to explore the theoretical frameworks, designs, contexts and intervention characteristics in the first 27 interventional studies conducted based on the ethics for person‐centredness provided by the GPCC. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A questionnaire to the principal investigators of the 27 intervention studies financed by the GPCC and conducted between 2010 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Theoretical frameworks, contexts of studies, person‐centred ethic, and outcome measures. RESULTS: Most of the interventions were based on the same ethical assumptions for person‐centredness but theories and models in applying the interventions differed. All studies were controlled; 12 randomized and 15 quasi‐experimental. Hospital in‐ and outpatient and primary care settings were represented and the outcome measures were related to the specific theories used. A complexity in designing, introducing and evaluating PCC interventions was evident. CONCLUSION: The frameworks, designs and interventions in the studies were in line with the established ethical basis of PCC, whereas outcome measures varied widely. Consensus discussions among researchers in the field are needed to make comparisons between studies feasible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: Patients or the public made no direct contributions, although most of the studied projects included such initiatives. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-18 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7696144/ /pubmed/32808455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13120 Text en © 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Gyllensten, Hanna
Björkman, Ida
Jakobsson Ung, Eva
Ekman, Inger
Jakobsson, Sofie
A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title_full A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title_fullStr A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title_full_unstemmed A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title_short A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: Content from the first interventional studies
title_sort national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person‐centred care: content from the first interventional studies
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13120
work_keys_str_mv AT gyllenstenhanna anationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT bjorkmanida anationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT jakobssonungeva anationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT ekmaninger anationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT jakobssonsofie anationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT gyllenstenhanna nationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT bjorkmanida nationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT jakobssonungeva nationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT ekmaninger nationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies
AT jakobssonsofie nationalresearchcentrefortheevaluationandimplementationofpersoncentredcarecontentfromthefirstinterventionalstudies