Cargando…

Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background: Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is a pathological entity with an unclear etiology (e.g., overheating during implant insertion, residual infection of the tooth replaced by the implant or the endodontic lesion of neighboring teeth) and an extremely low prevalence and has been scarcely in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Murro, Bianca, Pranno, Nicola, Raco, Andrea, Pistilli, Roberto, Pompa, Giorgio, Papi, Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228356
_version_ 1783615383537713152
author Di Murro, Bianca
Pranno, Nicola
Raco, Andrea
Pistilli, Roberto
Pompa, Giorgio
Papi, Piero
author_facet Di Murro, Bianca
Pranno, Nicola
Raco, Andrea
Pistilli, Roberto
Pompa, Giorgio
Papi, Piero
author_sort Di Murro, Bianca
collection PubMed
description Background: Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is a pathological entity with an unclear etiology (e.g., overheating during implant insertion, residual infection of the tooth replaced by the implant or the endodontic lesion of neighboring teeth) and an extremely low prevalence and has been scarcely investigated. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional survey was to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of Italian implantologists regarding RPI. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent via email to implantologists randomly selected, including a section about demographic information and questions related to RPI origin, radiographic representation, symptoms and treatment options. All questions were multiple answer and close-ended. Binomial logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between correct answers and the following independent variables: age, years of experience and number of dental implants placed per year. Results: In total, 475 implantologists completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 46.3%. Based on the results of the study, incorrect answers were associated with less experienced participants (<80 implants/year) for all questions evaluated, with the exception of treatment strategies. Furthermore, 26.7% of the survey takers did not recognize radiographic representation of RPI and 35.5% picked “implant removal” when asked about treatment modality. Conclusions: The majority of participants were able to recognize symptoms and indicated the probable causes of RPI; however, around 30% of them showed very limited knowledge of available management strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7696335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76963352020-11-29 Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey Di Murro, Bianca Pranno, Nicola Raco, Andrea Pistilli, Roberto Pompa, Giorgio Papi, Piero Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is a pathological entity with an unclear etiology (e.g., overheating during implant insertion, residual infection of the tooth replaced by the implant or the endodontic lesion of neighboring teeth) and an extremely low prevalence and has been scarcely investigated. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional survey was to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of Italian implantologists regarding RPI. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent via email to implantologists randomly selected, including a section about demographic information and questions related to RPI origin, radiographic representation, symptoms and treatment options. All questions were multiple answer and close-ended. Binomial logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between correct answers and the following independent variables: age, years of experience and number of dental implants placed per year. Results: In total, 475 implantologists completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 46.3%. Based on the results of the study, incorrect answers were associated with less experienced participants (<80 implants/year) for all questions evaluated, with the exception of treatment strategies. Furthermore, 26.7% of the survey takers did not recognize radiographic representation of RPI and 35.5% picked “implant removal” when asked about treatment modality. Conclusions: The majority of participants were able to recognize symptoms and indicated the probable causes of RPI; however, around 30% of them showed very limited knowledge of available management strategies. MDPI 2020-11-12 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7696335/ /pubmed/33198070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228356 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Di Murro, Bianca
Pranno, Nicola
Raco, Andrea
Pistilli, Roberto
Pompa, Giorgio
Papi, Piero
Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_fullStr Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_short Knowledge and Attitude towards Retrograde Peri-Implantitis among Italian Implantologists: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_sort knowledge and attitude towards retrograde peri-implantitis among italian implantologists: a cross-sectional survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228356
work_keys_str_mv AT dimurrobianca knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT prannonicola knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT racoandrea knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pistilliroberto knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pompagiorgio knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT papipiero knowledgeandattitudetowardsretrogradeperiimplantitisamongitalianimplantologistsacrosssectionalsurvey