Cargando…

Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings

The aim of this study was to investigate how a female face is perceived in terms of its attractiveness, dominance, health, femininity-masculinity, and maturity in direct relation to the body fat percentage (BFP) conveyed by the face. To compare how young adults (ages 18 to 35) respond to different l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walla, Peter, Chang, Minah, Schaefer, Katrin, Windhager, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110861
_version_ 1783615416655937536
author Walla, Peter
Chang, Minah
Schaefer, Katrin
Windhager, Sonja
author_facet Walla, Peter
Chang, Minah
Schaefer, Katrin
Windhager, Sonja
author_sort Walla, Peter
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate how a female face is perceived in terms of its attractiveness, dominance, health, femininity-masculinity, and maturity in direct relation to the body fat percentage (BFP) conveyed by the face. To compare how young adults (ages 18 to 35) respond to different levels of body fat percentage both subjectively and objectively we collected survey ratings and electroencephalography (EEG) data across five different levels of BFP from 40 participants. We adapted the experimental design from a prior behavioral study and used calibrated and morphed female face images of five different BFP levels. The results of the survey are in consensus with the previous study and assessed to be a successful replication. From the EEG data, event-related potentials (ERPs) were extracted from one electrode location (right occipitotemporal brain region) known to be particularly sensitive to face-stimuli. We found statistically significant differences in the amplitudes of the P200 component (194 ms post stimulus onset) between the thickest face and all four other BFP conditions, and in the amplitudes of the N300 component (274 ms post stimulus onset) between the average face and three other BFP conditions. As expected, there were no significant differences among the N170 amplitudes of all five BFP conditions since this ERP component simply reflects the processing of faces in general. From these results, we can infer that holistic face encoding characterized by the N170 component in the right occipitotemporal area is followed by serial evaluative processes, whose categorical and qualitative matrix and spatiotemporal dynamics should be further explored in future studies, especially in relation to the social constructs that were focused on in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7696491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76964912020-11-29 Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings Walla, Peter Chang, Minah Schaefer, Katrin Windhager, Sonja Brain Sci Article The aim of this study was to investigate how a female face is perceived in terms of its attractiveness, dominance, health, femininity-masculinity, and maturity in direct relation to the body fat percentage (BFP) conveyed by the face. To compare how young adults (ages 18 to 35) respond to different levels of body fat percentage both subjectively and objectively we collected survey ratings and electroencephalography (EEG) data across five different levels of BFP from 40 participants. We adapted the experimental design from a prior behavioral study and used calibrated and morphed female face images of five different BFP levels. The results of the survey are in consensus with the previous study and assessed to be a successful replication. From the EEG data, event-related potentials (ERPs) were extracted from one electrode location (right occipitotemporal brain region) known to be particularly sensitive to face-stimuli. We found statistically significant differences in the amplitudes of the P200 component (194 ms post stimulus onset) between the thickest face and all four other BFP conditions, and in the amplitudes of the N300 component (274 ms post stimulus onset) between the average face and three other BFP conditions. As expected, there were no significant differences among the N170 amplitudes of all five BFP conditions since this ERP component simply reflects the processing of faces in general. From these results, we can infer that holistic face encoding characterized by the N170 component in the right occipitotemporal area is followed by serial evaluative processes, whose categorical and qualitative matrix and spatiotemporal dynamics should be further explored in future studies, especially in relation to the social constructs that were focused on in this study. MDPI 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7696491/ /pubmed/33207720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110861 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Walla, Peter
Chang, Minah
Schaefer, Katrin
Windhager, Sonja
Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title_full Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title_fullStr Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title_full_unstemmed Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title_short Social Perception of Faces: Brain Imaging and Subjective Ratings
title_sort social perception of faces: brain imaging and subjective ratings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110861
work_keys_str_mv AT wallapeter socialperceptionoffacesbrainimagingandsubjectiveratings
AT changminah socialperceptionoffacesbrainimagingandsubjectiveratings
AT schaeferkatrin socialperceptionoffacesbrainimagingandsubjectiveratings
AT windhagersonja socialperceptionoffacesbrainimagingandsubjectiveratings