Cargando…

Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study

Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameli, Matteo, Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel, Magne, Julien, Mandoli, Giulia Elena, Benfari, Giovanni, Ancona, Roberta, Sibilio, Gerolamo, Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka, Dejan, Dosen, Griseli, Leonardo, Van De Heyning, Caroline M., Mortelmans, Philippe, Michalski, Blazej, Kupczynska, Karolina, Di Giannuario, Giovanna, Devito, Fiorella, Dulgheru, Raluca, Ilardi, Federica, Salustri, Alessandro, Abushahba, Galal, Morrone, Doralisa, Fabiani, Iacopo, Penicka, Martin, Katbeh, Asim, Sammarco, Giuseppe, Esposito, Roberta, Santoro, Ciro, Pastore, Maria Concetta, Comenale Pinto, Salvatore, Kalinin, Artem, Pičkure, Žanna, Ažman Juvan, Katja, Zupan Mežnar, Anja, Coisne, Augustine, Coppin, Amandine, Opris, Mihaela Maria, Nistor, Dan Octavian, Paakkanen, Riitta, Biering-Sørensen, Tor, Olsen, Flemming Javier, Lapinskas, Tomas, Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina, Galian-Gay, Laura, Casas, Guillem, Motoc, Andreea Iulia, Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou, Loizos, Savvas, Ágoston, Gergely, Szabó, Istvan, Hristova, Krasimira, Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov, Galli, Elena, Vinereanu, Dragos, Mihaila Baldea, Sorina, Muraru, Denisa, Mondillo, Sergio, Donal, Erwan, Galderisi, Maurizio, Cosyns, Bernard, Edvardsen, Thor, Popescu, Bogdan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946
_version_ 1783615509877489664
author Cameli, Matteo
Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel
Magne, Julien
Mandoli, Giulia Elena
Benfari, Giovanni
Ancona, Roberta
Sibilio, Gerolamo
Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka
Dejan, Dosen
Griseli, Leonardo
Van De Heyning, Caroline M.
Mortelmans, Philippe
Michalski, Blazej
Kupczynska, Karolina
Di Giannuario, Giovanna
Devito, Fiorella
Dulgheru, Raluca
Ilardi, Federica
Salustri, Alessandro
Abushahba, Galal
Morrone, Doralisa
Fabiani, Iacopo
Penicka, Martin
Katbeh, Asim
Sammarco, Giuseppe
Esposito, Roberta
Santoro, Ciro
Pastore, Maria Concetta
Comenale Pinto, Salvatore
Kalinin, Artem
Pičkure, Žanna
Ažman Juvan, Katja
Zupan Mežnar, Anja
Coisne, Augustine
Coppin, Amandine
Opris, Mihaela Maria
Nistor, Dan Octavian
Paakkanen, Riitta
Biering-Sørensen, Tor
Olsen, Flemming Javier
Lapinskas, Tomas
Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina
Galian-Gay, Laura
Casas, Guillem
Motoc, Andreea Iulia
Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou
Loizos, Savvas
Ágoston, Gergely
Szabó, Istvan
Hristova, Krasimira
Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov
Galli, Elena
Vinereanu, Dragos
Mihaila Baldea, Sorina
Muraru, Denisa
Mondillo, Sergio
Donal, Erwan
Galderisi, Maurizio
Cosyns, Bernard
Edvardsen, Thor
Popescu, Bogdan A.
author_facet Cameli, Matteo
Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel
Magne, Julien
Mandoli, Giulia Elena
Benfari, Giovanni
Ancona, Roberta
Sibilio, Gerolamo
Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka
Dejan, Dosen
Griseli, Leonardo
Van De Heyning, Caroline M.
Mortelmans, Philippe
Michalski, Blazej
Kupczynska, Karolina
Di Giannuario, Giovanna
Devito, Fiorella
Dulgheru, Raluca
Ilardi, Federica
Salustri, Alessandro
Abushahba, Galal
Morrone, Doralisa
Fabiani, Iacopo
Penicka, Martin
Katbeh, Asim
Sammarco, Giuseppe
Esposito, Roberta
Santoro, Ciro
Pastore, Maria Concetta
Comenale Pinto, Salvatore
Kalinin, Artem
Pičkure, Žanna
Ažman Juvan, Katja
Zupan Mežnar, Anja
Coisne, Augustine
Coppin, Amandine
Opris, Mihaela Maria
Nistor, Dan Octavian
Paakkanen, Riitta
Biering-Sørensen, Tor
Olsen, Flemming Javier
Lapinskas, Tomas
Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina
Galian-Gay, Laura
Casas, Guillem
Motoc, Andreea Iulia
Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou
Loizos, Savvas
Ágoston, Gergely
Szabó, Istvan
Hristova, Krasimira
Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov
Galli, Elena
Vinereanu, Dragos
Mihaila Baldea, Sorina
Muraru, Denisa
Mondillo, Sergio
Donal, Erwan
Galderisi, Maurizio
Cosyns, Bernard
Edvardsen, Thor
Popescu, Bogdan A.
author_sort Cameli, Matteo
collection PubMed
description Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more feasible, and less time consuming. In 26 expert centers, LA strain was analyzed by two different echocardiographers (young vs senior) in a blinded fashion. The study population included: healthy subjects, patients with arterial hypertension or aortic stenosis (LA pressure overload, group 2) and patients with mitral regurgitation or heart failure (LA volume–pressure overload, group 3). Difference between the inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) by the two echocardiographers using the two techniques, feasibility and analysis time of both methods were analyzed. A total of 938 subjects were included: 309 controls, 333 patients in group 2, and 296 patients in group 3. The ICC was comparable between QRS-LASr (0.93) and P-LASr (0.90). The young echocardiographers calculated QRS-LASr in 90% of cases, the expert ones in 95%. The feasibility of P-LASr was 85% by young echocardiographers and 88% by senior ones. QRS-LASr young median time was 110 s (interquartile range, IR, 78-149) vs senior 110 s (IR 78-155); for P-LASr, 120 s (IR 80-165) and 120 s (IR 90-161), respectively. LA strain was feasible in the majority of patients with similar reproducibility for both methods. QRS complex guaranteed a slightly higher feasibility and a lower time wasting compared to the use of P wave as the reference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7696899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76968992020-11-29 Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study Cameli, Matteo Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel Magne, Julien Mandoli, Giulia Elena Benfari, Giovanni Ancona, Roberta Sibilio, Gerolamo Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka Dejan, Dosen Griseli, Leonardo Van De Heyning, Caroline M. Mortelmans, Philippe Michalski, Blazej Kupczynska, Karolina Di Giannuario, Giovanna Devito, Fiorella Dulgheru, Raluca Ilardi, Federica Salustri, Alessandro Abushahba, Galal Morrone, Doralisa Fabiani, Iacopo Penicka, Martin Katbeh, Asim Sammarco, Giuseppe Esposito, Roberta Santoro, Ciro Pastore, Maria Concetta Comenale Pinto, Salvatore Kalinin, Artem Pičkure, Žanna Ažman Juvan, Katja Zupan Mežnar, Anja Coisne, Augustine Coppin, Amandine Opris, Mihaela Maria Nistor, Dan Octavian Paakkanen, Riitta Biering-Sørensen, Tor Olsen, Flemming Javier Lapinskas, Tomas Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina Galian-Gay, Laura Casas, Guillem Motoc, Andreea Iulia Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou Loizos, Savvas Ágoston, Gergely Szabó, Istvan Hristova, Krasimira Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov Galli, Elena Vinereanu, Dragos Mihaila Baldea, Sorina Muraru, Denisa Mondillo, Sergio Donal, Erwan Galderisi, Maurizio Cosyns, Bernard Edvardsen, Thor Popescu, Bogdan A. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more feasible, and less time consuming. In 26 expert centers, LA strain was analyzed by two different echocardiographers (young vs senior) in a blinded fashion. The study population included: healthy subjects, patients with arterial hypertension or aortic stenosis (LA pressure overload, group 2) and patients with mitral regurgitation or heart failure (LA volume–pressure overload, group 3). Difference between the inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) by the two echocardiographers using the two techniques, feasibility and analysis time of both methods were analyzed. A total of 938 subjects were included: 309 controls, 333 patients in group 2, and 296 patients in group 3. The ICC was comparable between QRS-LASr (0.93) and P-LASr (0.90). The young echocardiographers calculated QRS-LASr in 90% of cases, the expert ones in 95%. The feasibility of P-LASr was 85% by young echocardiographers and 88% by senior ones. QRS-LASr young median time was 110 s (interquartile range, IR, 78-149) vs senior 110 s (IR 78-155); for P-LASr, 120 s (IR 80-165) and 120 s (IR 90-161), respectively. LA strain was feasible in the majority of patients with similar reproducibility for both methods. QRS complex guaranteed a slightly higher feasibility and a lower time wasting compared to the use of P wave as the reference. MDPI 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7696899/ /pubmed/33202837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cameli, Matteo
Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel
Magne, Julien
Mandoli, Giulia Elena
Benfari, Giovanni
Ancona, Roberta
Sibilio, Gerolamo
Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka
Dejan, Dosen
Griseli, Leonardo
Van De Heyning, Caroline M.
Mortelmans, Philippe
Michalski, Blazej
Kupczynska, Karolina
Di Giannuario, Giovanna
Devito, Fiorella
Dulgheru, Raluca
Ilardi, Federica
Salustri, Alessandro
Abushahba, Galal
Morrone, Doralisa
Fabiani, Iacopo
Penicka, Martin
Katbeh, Asim
Sammarco, Giuseppe
Esposito, Roberta
Santoro, Ciro
Pastore, Maria Concetta
Comenale Pinto, Salvatore
Kalinin, Artem
Pičkure, Žanna
Ažman Juvan, Katja
Zupan Mežnar, Anja
Coisne, Augustine
Coppin, Amandine
Opris, Mihaela Maria
Nistor, Dan Octavian
Paakkanen, Riitta
Biering-Sørensen, Tor
Olsen, Flemming Javier
Lapinskas, Tomas
Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina
Galian-Gay, Laura
Casas, Guillem
Motoc, Andreea Iulia
Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou
Loizos, Savvas
Ágoston, Gergely
Szabó, Istvan
Hristova, Krasimira
Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov
Galli, Elena
Vinereanu, Dragos
Mihaila Baldea, Sorina
Muraru, Denisa
Mondillo, Sergio
Donal, Erwan
Galderisi, Maurizio
Cosyns, Bernard
Edvardsen, Thor
Popescu, Bogdan A.
Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title_full Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title_fullStr Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title_full_unstemmed Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title_short Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
title_sort multicentric atrial strain comparison between two different modalities: mascot hit study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946
work_keys_str_mv AT camelimatteo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT miglioranzamarcelohaertel multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT magnejulien multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT mandoligiuliaelena multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT benfarigiovanni multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT anconaroberta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT sibiliogerolamo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT reskovicluksicvlatka multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT dejandosen multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT griselileonardo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT vandeheyningcarolinem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT mortelmansphilippe multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT michalskiblazej multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT kupczynskakarolina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT digiannuariogiovanna multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT devitofiorella multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT dulgheruraluca multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT ilardifederica multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT salustrialessandro multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT abushahbagalal multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT morronedoralisa multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT fabianiiacopo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT penickamartin multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT katbehasim multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT sammarcogiuseppe multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT espositoroberta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT santorociro multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT pastoremariaconcetta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT comenalepintosalvatore multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT kalininartem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT pickurezanna multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT azmanjuvankatja multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT zupanmeznaranja multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT coisneaugustine multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT coppinamandine multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT oprismihaelamaria multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT nistordanoctavian multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT paakkanenriitta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT bieringsørensentor multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT olsenflemmingjavier multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT lapinskastomas multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT vaskelytejolantajustina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT galiangaylaura multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT casasguillem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT motocandreeaiulia multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT papadopoulosconstantinoshristou multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT loizossavvas multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT agostongergely multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT szaboistvan multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT hristovakrasimira multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT tsonevsvetlinnetkov multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT gallielena multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT vinereanudragos multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT mihailabaldeasorina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT murarudenisa multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT mondillosergio multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT donalerwan multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT galderisimaurizio multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT cosynsbernard multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT edvardsenthor multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy
AT popescubogdana multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy