Cargando…
Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study
Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946 |
_version_ | 1783615509877489664 |
---|---|
author | Cameli, Matteo Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel Magne, Julien Mandoli, Giulia Elena Benfari, Giovanni Ancona, Roberta Sibilio, Gerolamo Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka Dejan, Dosen Griseli, Leonardo Van De Heyning, Caroline M. Mortelmans, Philippe Michalski, Blazej Kupczynska, Karolina Di Giannuario, Giovanna Devito, Fiorella Dulgheru, Raluca Ilardi, Federica Salustri, Alessandro Abushahba, Galal Morrone, Doralisa Fabiani, Iacopo Penicka, Martin Katbeh, Asim Sammarco, Giuseppe Esposito, Roberta Santoro, Ciro Pastore, Maria Concetta Comenale Pinto, Salvatore Kalinin, Artem Pičkure, Žanna Ažman Juvan, Katja Zupan Mežnar, Anja Coisne, Augustine Coppin, Amandine Opris, Mihaela Maria Nistor, Dan Octavian Paakkanen, Riitta Biering-Sørensen, Tor Olsen, Flemming Javier Lapinskas, Tomas Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina Galian-Gay, Laura Casas, Guillem Motoc, Andreea Iulia Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou Loizos, Savvas Ágoston, Gergely Szabó, Istvan Hristova, Krasimira Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov Galli, Elena Vinereanu, Dragos Mihaila Baldea, Sorina Muraru, Denisa Mondillo, Sergio Donal, Erwan Galderisi, Maurizio Cosyns, Bernard Edvardsen, Thor Popescu, Bogdan A. |
author_facet | Cameli, Matteo Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel Magne, Julien Mandoli, Giulia Elena Benfari, Giovanni Ancona, Roberta Sibilio, Gerolamo Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka Dejan, Dosen Griseli, Leonardo Van De Heyning, Caroline M. Mortelmans, Philippe Michalski, Blazej Kupczynska, Karolina Di Giannuario, Giovanna Devito, Fiorella Dulgheru, Raluca Ilardi, Federica Salustri, Alessandro Abushahba, Galal Morrone, Doralisa Fabiani, Iacopo Penicka, Martin Katbeh, Asim Sammarco, Giuseppe Esposito, Roberta Santoro, Ciro Pastore, Maria Concetta Comenale Pinto, Salvatore Kalinin, Artem Pičkure, Žanna Ažman Juvan, Katja Zupan Mežnar, Anja Coisne, Augustine Coppin, Amandine Opris, Mihaela Maria Nistor, Dan Octavian Paakkanen, Riitta Biering-Sørensen, Tor Olsen, Flemming Javier Lapinskas, Tomas Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina Galian-Gay, Laura Casas, Guillem Motoc, Andreea Iulia Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou Loizos, Savvas Ágoston, Gergely Szabó, Istvan Hristova, Krasimira Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov Galli, Elena Vinereanu, Dragos Mihaila Baldea, Sorina Muraru, Denisa Mondillo, Sergio Donal, Erwan Galderisi, Maurizio Cosyns, Bernard Edvardsen, Thor Popescu, Bogdan A. |
author_sort | Cameli, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more feasible, and less time consuming. In 26 expert centers, LA strain was analyzed by two different echocardiographers (young vs senior) in a blinded fashion. The study population included: healthy subjects, patients with arterial hypertension or aortic stenosis (LA pressure overload, group 2) and patients with mitral regurgitation or heart failure (LA volume–pressure overload, group 3). Difference between the inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) by the two echocardiographers using the two techniques, feasibility and analysis time of both methods were analyzed. A total of 938 subjects were included: 309 controls, 333 patients in group 2, and 296 patients in group 3. The ICC was comparable between QRS-LASr (0.93) and P-LASr (0.90). The young echocardiographers calculated QRS-LASr in 90% of cases, the expert ones in 95%. The feasibility of P-LASr was 85% by young echocardiographers and 88% by senior ones. QRS-LASr young median time was 110 s (interquartile range, IR, 78-149) vs senior 110 s (IR 78-155); for P-LASr, 120 s (IR 80-165) and 120 s (IR 90-161), respectively. LA strain was feasible in the majority of patients with similar reproducibility for both methods. QRS complex guaranteed a slightly higher feasibility and a lower time wasting compared to the use of P wave as the reference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7696899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76968992020-11-29 Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study Cameli, Matteo Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel Magne, Julien Mandoli, Giulia Elena Benfari, Giovanni Ancona, Roberta Sibilio, Gerolamo Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka Dejan, Dosen Griseli, Leonardo Van De Heyning, Caroline M. Mortelmans, Philippe Michalski, Blazej Kupczynska, Karolina Di Giannuario, Giovanna Devito, Fiorella Dulgheru, Raluca Ilardi, Federica Salustri, Alessandro Abushahba, Galal Morrone, Doralisa Fabiani, Iacopo Penicka, Martin Katbeh, Asim Sammarco, Giuseppe Esposito, Roberta Santoro, Ciro Pastore, Maria Concetta Comenale Pinto, Salvatore Kalinin, Artem Pičkure, Žanna Ažman Juvan, Katja Zupan Mežnar, Anja Coisne, Augustine Coppin, Amandine Opris, Mihaela Maria Nistor, Dan Octavian Paakkanen, Riitta Biering-Sørensen, Tor Olsen, Flemming Javier Lapinskas, Tomas Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina Galian-Gay, Laura Casas, Guillem Motoc, Andreea Iulia Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou Loizos, Savvas Ágoston, Gergely Szabó, Istvan Hristova, Krasimira Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov Galli, Elena Vinereanu, Dragos Mihaila Baldea, Sorina Muraru, Denisa Mondillo, Sergio Donal, Erwan Galderisi, Maurizio Cosyns, Bernard Edvardsen, Thor Popescu, Bogdan A. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Two methods are currently available for left atrial (LA) strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography, with two different reference timings for starting the analysis: QRS (QRS-LASr) and P wave (P-LASr). The aim of MASCOT HIT study was to define which of the two was more reproducible, more feasible, and less time consuming. In 26 expert centers, LA strain was analyzed by two different echocardiographers (young vs senior) in a blinded fashion. The study population included: healthy subjects, patients with arterial hypertension or aortic stenosis (LA pressure overload, group 2) and patients with mitral regurgitation or heart failure (LA volume–pressure overload, group 3). Difference between the inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) by the two echocardiographers using the two techniques, feasibility and analysis time of both methods were analyzed. A total of 938 subjects were included: 309 controls, 333 patients in group 2, and 296 patients in group 3. The ICC was comparable between QRS-LASr (0.93) and P-LASr (0.90). The young echocardiographers calculated QRS-LASr in 90% of cases, the expert ones in 95%. The feasibility of P-LASr was 85% by young echocardiographers and 88% by senior ones. QRS-LASr young median time was 110 s (interquartile range, IR, 78-149) vs senior 110 s (IR 78-155); for P-LASr, 120 s (IR 80-165) and 120 s (IR 90-161), respectively. LA strain was feasible in the majority of patients with similar reproducibility for both methods. QRS complex guaranteed a slightly higher feasibility and a lower time wasting compared to the use of P wave as the reference. MDPI 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7696899/ /pubmed/33202837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cameli, Matteo Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel Magne, Julien Mandoli, Giulia Elena Benfari, Giovanni Ancona, Roberta Sibilio, Gerolamo Reskovic Luksic, Vlatka Dejan, Dosen Griseli, Leonardo Van De Heyning, Caroline M. Mortelmans, Philippe Michalski, Blazej Kupczynska, Karolina Di Giannuario, Giovanna Devito, Fiorella Dulgheru, Raluca Ilardi, Federica Salustri, Alessandro Abushahba, Galal Morrone, Doralisa Fabiani, Iacopo Penicka, Martin Katbeh, Asim Sammarco, Giuseppe Esposito, Roberta Santoro, Ciro Pastore, Maria Concetta Comenale Pinto, Salvatore Kalinin, Artem Pičkure, Žanna Ažman Juvan, Katja Zupan Mežnar, Anja Coisne, Augustine Coppin, Amandine Opris, Mihaela Maria Nistor, Dan Octavian Paakkanen, Riitta Biering-Sørensen, Tor Olsen, Flemming Javier Lapinskas, Tomas Vaškelyté, Jolanta Justina Galian-Gay, Laura Casas, Guillem Motoc, Andreea Iulia Papadopoulos, Constantinos Hristou Loizos, Savvas Ágoston, Gergely Szabó, Istvan Hristova, Krasimira Tsonev, Svetlin Netkov Galli, Elena Vinereanu, Dragos Mihaila Baldea, Sorina Muraru, Denisa Mondillo, Sergio Donal, Erwan Galderisi, Maurizio Cosyns, Bernard Edvardsen, Thor Popescu, Bogdan A. Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title | Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title_full | Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title_fullStr | Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title_short | Multicentric Atrial Strain COmparison between Two Different Modalities: MASCOT HIT Study |
title_sort | multicentric atrial strain comparison between two different modalities: mascot hit study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camelimatteo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT miglioranzamarcelohaertel multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT magnejulien multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT mandoligiuliaelena multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT benfarigiovanni multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT anconaroberta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT sibiliogerolamo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT reskovicluksicvlatka multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT dejandosen multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT griselileonardo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT vandeheyningcarolinem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT mortelmansphilippe multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT michalskiblazej multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT kupczynskakarolina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT digiannuariogiovanna multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT devitofiorella multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT dulgheruraluca multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT ilardifederica multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT salustrialessandro multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT abushahbagalal multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT morronedoralisa multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT fabianiiacopo multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT penickamartin multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT katbehasim multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT sammarcogiuseppe multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT espositoroberta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT santorociro multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT pastoremariaconcetta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT comenalepintosalvatore multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT kalininartem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT pickurezanna multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT azmanjuvankatja multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT zupanmeznaranja multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT coisneaugustine multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT coppinamandine multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT oprismihaelamaria multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT nistordanoctavian multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT paakkanenriitta multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT bieringsørensentor multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT olsenflemmingjavier multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT lapinskastomas multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT vaskelytejolantajustina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT galiangaylaura multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT casasguillem multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT motocandreeaiulia multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT papadopoulosconstantinoshristou multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT loizossavvas multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT agostongergely multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT szaboistvan multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT hristovakrasimira multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT tsonevsvetlinnetkov multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT gallielena multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT vinereanudragos multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT mihailabaldeasorina multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT murarudenisa multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT mondillosergio multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT donalerwan multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT galderisimaurizio multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT cosynsbernard multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT edvardsenthor multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy AT popescubogdana multicentricatrialstraincomparisonbetweentwodifferentmodalitiesmascothitstudy |