Cargando…

No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capalbo, Carlo, Bertamino, Enrico, Zerbetto, Alessandro, Santino, Iolanda, Petrucca, Andrea, Mancini, Rita, Bonfini, Rita, Alfonsi, Valeria, Ferracuti, Stefano, Marchetti, Paolo, Simmaco, Maurizio, Orsi, Giovanni Battista, Napoli, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461
_version_ 1783615519225544704
author Capalbo, Carlo
Bertamino, Enrico
Zerbetto, Alessandro
Santino, Iolanda
Petrucca, Andrea
Mancini, Rita
Bonfini, Rita
Alfonsi, Valeria
Ferracuti, Stefano
Marchetti, Paolo
Simmaco, Maurizio
Orsi, Giovanni Battista
Napoli, Christian
author_facet Capalbo, Carlo
Bertamino, Enrico
Zerbetto, Alessandro
Santino, Iolanda
Petrucca, Andrea
Mancini, Rita
Bonfini, Rita
Alfonsi, Valeria
Ferracuti, Stefano
Marchetti, Paolo
Simmaco, Maurizio
Orsi, Giovanni Battista
Napoli, Christian
author_sort Capalbo, Carlo
collection PubMed
description In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia” had been reported earlier than those officially accepted by health authorities. This has led many investigators to check preserved biological or environmental samples to see whether the virus was detectable on dates prior to those officially stated. With regard to Italy, the results of a microbiological screening in sewage samples collected between the end of February and the beginning of April 2020 from wastewaters in Milan (Northern Italy) and Rome (Central Italy) showed presence of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, we evaluated, by means of a standardized diagnostic method, the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence amongst patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARI) in an academic hospital located in Central Italy during the period of 1 November 2019–1 March 2020. Overall, the number of emergency room (ER) visits during the investigated period was 13,843. Of these, 1208 had an influenza-like syndrome, but only 166 matched the definition of SARI as stated in the study protocol. A total of 52 SARI cases were laboratory confirmed as influenza: 26 as a type B virus, 25 as a type A, and 1 as both viruses. Although about 17% of the total sample had laboratory or radiological data compatible with COVID-19, all the nasopharyngeal swabs stored underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and tested negative. Based on our result, it is confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic spread did not start prior to the “official” onset in central Italy. Routine monitoring of SARI causative agents at the local level is critical for reporting epidemiologic and etiologic trends that may differ from one country to another and also among different influenza seasons. This has a practical impact on prevention and control strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7696939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76969392020-11-29 No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance Capalbo, Carlo Bertamino, Enrico Zerbetto, Alessandro Santino, Iolanda Petrucca, Andrea Mancini, Rita Bonfini, Rita Alfonsi, Valeria Ferracuti, Stefano Marchetti, Paolo Simmaco, Maurizio Orsi, Giovanni Battista Napoli, Christian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia” had been reported earlier than those officially accepted by health authorities. This has led many investigators to check preserved biological or environmental samples to see whether the virus was detectable on dates prior to those officially stated. With regard to Italy, the results of a microbiological screening in sewage samples collected between the end of February and the beginning of April 2020 from wastewaters in Milan (Northern Italy) and Rome (Central Italy) showed presence of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, we evaluated, by means of a standardized diagnostic method, the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence amongst patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARI) in an academic hospital located in Central Italy during the period of 1 November 2019–1 March 2020. Overall, the number of emergency room (ER) visits during the investigated period was 13,843. Of these, 1208 had an influenza-like syndrome, but only 166 matched the definition of SARI as stated in the study protocol. A total of 52 SARI cases were laboratory confirmed as influenza: 26 as a type B virus, 25 as a type A, and 1 as both viruses. Although about 17% of the total sample had laboratory or radiological data compatible with COVID-19, all the nasopharyngeal swabs stored underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and tested negative. Based on our result, it is confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic spread did not start prior to the “official” onset in central Italy. Routine monitoring of SARI causative agents at the local level is critical for reporting epidemiologic and etiologic trends that may differ from one country to another and also among different influenza seasons. This has a practical impact on prevention and control strategies. MDPI 2020-11-16 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7696939/ /pubmed/33207548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Capalbo, Carlo
Bertamino, Enrico
Zerbetto, Alessandro
Santino, Iolanda
Petrucca, Andrea
Mancini, Rita
Bonfini, Rita
Alfonsi, Valeria
Ferracuti, Stefano
Marchetti, Paolo
Simmaco, Maurizio
Orsi, Giovanni Battista
Napoli, Christian
No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title_full No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title_fullStr No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title_full_unstemmed No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title_short No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
title_sort no evidence of sars-cov-2 circulation in rome (italy) during the pre-pandemic period: results of a retrospective surveillance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461
work_keys_str_mv AT capalbocarlo noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT bertaminoenrico noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT zerbettoalessandro noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT santinoiolanda noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT petruccaandrea noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT mancinirita noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT bonfinirita noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT alfonsivaleria noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT ferracutistefano noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT marchettipaolo noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT simmacomaurizio noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT orsigiovannibattista noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance
AT napolichristian noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance