Cargando…
No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance
In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia”...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461 |
_version_ | 1783615519225544704 |
---|---|
author | Capalbo, Carlo Bertamino, Enrico Zerbetto, Alessandro Santino, Iolanda Petrucca, Andrea Mancini, Rita Bonfini, Rita Alfonsi, Valeria Ferracuti, Stefano Marchetti, Paolo Simmaco, Maurizio Orsi, Giovanni Battista Napoli, Christian |
author_facet | Capalbo, Carlo Bertamino, Enrico Zerbetto, Alessandro Santino, Iolanda Petrucca, Andrea Mancini, Rita Bonfini, Rita Alfonsi, Valeria Ferracuti, Stefano Marchetti, Paolo Simmaco, Maurizio Orsi, Giovanni Battista Napoli, Christian |
author_sort | Capalbo, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia” had been reported earlier than those officially accepted by health authorities. This has led many investigators to check preserved biological or environmental samples to see whether the virus was detectable on dates prior to those officially stated. With regard to Italy, the results of a microbiological screening in sewage samples collected between the end of February and the beginning of April 2020 from wastewaters in Milan (Northern Italy) and Rome (Central Italy) showed presence of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, we evaluated, by means of a standardized diagnostic method, the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence amongst patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARI) in an academic hospital located in Central Italy during the period of 1 November 2019–1 March 2020. Overall, the number of emergency room (ER) visits during the investigated period was 13,843. Of these, 1208 had an influenza-like syndrome, but only 166 matched the definition of SARI as stated in the study protocol. A total of 52 SARI cases were laboratory confirmed as influenza: 26 as a type B virus, 25 as a type A, and 1 as both viruses. Although about 17% of the total sample had laboratory or radiological data compatible with COVID-19, all the nasopharyngeal swabs stored underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and tested negative. Based on our result, it is confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic spread did not start prior to the “official” onset in central Italy. Routine monitoring of SARI causative agents at the local level is critical for reporting epidemiologic and etiologic trends that may differ from one country to another and also among different influenza seasons. This has a practical impact on prevention and control strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7696939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76969392020-11-29 No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance Capalbo, Carlo Bertamino, Enrico Zerbetto, Alessandro Santino, Iolanda Petrucca, Andrea Mancini, Rita Bonfini, Rita Alfonsi, Valeria Ferracuti, Stefano Marchetti, Paolo Simmaco, Maurizio Orsi, Giovanni Battista Napoli, Christian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak recorded over the previous months could be characterized as a pandemic. The first known Italian SARS-CoV-2 positive case was reported on 21 February. In some countries, cases of suspected “COVID-19-like pneumonia” had been reported earlier than those officially accepted by health authorities. This has led many investigators to check preserved biological or environmental samples to see whether the virus was detectable on dates prior to those officially stated. With regard to Italy, the results of a microbiological screening in sewage samples collected between the end of February and the beginning of April 2020 from wastewaters in Milan (Northern Italy) and Rome (Central Italy) showed presence of SARS-CoV-2. In the present study, we evaluated, by means of a standardized diagnostic method, the SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence amongst patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARI) in an academic hospital located in Central Italy during the period of 1 November 2019–1 March 2020. Overall, the number of emergency room (ER) visits during the investigated period was 13,843. Of these, 1208 had an influenza-like syndrome, but only 166 matched the definition of SARI as stated in the study protocol. A total of 52 SARI cases were laboratory confirmed as influenza: 26 as a type B virus, 25 as a type A, and 1 as both viruses. Although about 17% of the total sample had laboratory or radiological data compatible with COVID-19, all the nasopharyngeal swabs stored underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and tested negative. Based on our result, it is confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic spread did not start prior to the “official” onset in central Italy. Routine monitoring of SARI causative agents at the local level is critical for reporting epidemiologic and etiologic trends that may differ from one country to another and also among different influenza seasons. This has a practical impact on prevention and control strategies. MDPI 2020-11-16 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7696939/ /pubmed/33207548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Capalbo, Carlo Bertamino, Enrico Zerbetto, Alessandro Santino, Iolanda Petrucca, Andrea Mancini, Rita Bonfini, Rita Alfonsi, Valeria Ferracuti, Stefano Marchetti, Paolo Simmaco, Maurizio Orsi, Giovanni Battista Napoli, Christian No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title | No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title_full | No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title_fullStr | No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title_short | No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Rome (Italy) during the Pre-Pandemic Period: Results of a Retrospective Surveillance |
title_sort | no evidence of sars-cov-2 circulation in rome (italy) during the pre-pandemic period: results of a retrospective surveillance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7696939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT capalbocarlo noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT bertaminoenrico noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT zerbettoalessandro noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT santinoiolanda noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT petruccaandrea noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT mancinirita noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT bonfinirita noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT alfonsivaleria noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT ferracutistefano noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT marchettipaolo noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT simmacomaurizio noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT orsigiovannibattista noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance AT napolichristian noevidenceofsarscov2circulationinromeitalyduringtheprepandemicperiodresultsofaretrospectivesurveillance |