Cargando…

Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future

Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stackhouse, Tammy, Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D., Ali, Md Emran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544
_version_ 1783615573560655872
author Stackhouse, Tammy
Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D.
Ali, Md Emran
author_facet Stackhouse, Tammy
Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D.
Ali, Md Emran
author_sort Stackhouse, Tammy
collection PubMed
description Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76972622020-11-29 Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future Stackhouse, Tammy Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D. Ali, Md Emran Plants (Basel) Review Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection. MDPI 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7697262/ /pubmed/33187303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Stackhouse, Tammy
Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D.
Ali, Md Emran
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_full Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_fullStr Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_full_unstemmed Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_short Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_sort turfgrass disease diagnosis: past, present, and future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544
work_keys_str_mv AT stackhousetammy turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture
AT martinezespinozaalfredod turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture
AT alimdemran turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture