Cargando…
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544 |
_version_ | 1783615573560655872 |
---|---|
author | Stackhouse, Tammy Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D. Ali, Md Emran |
author_facet | Stackhouse, Tammy Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D. Ali, Md Emran |
author_sort | Stackhouse, Tammy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7697262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76972622020-11-29 Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future Stackhouse, Tammy Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D. Ali, Md Emran Plants (Basel) Review Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection. MDPI 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7697262/ /pubmed/33187303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Stackhouse, Tammy Martinez-Espinoza, Alfredo D. Ali, Md Emran Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title | Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full | Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_fullStr | Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_short | Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_sort | turfgrass disease diagnosis: past, present, and future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stackhousetammy turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture AT martinezespinozaalfredod turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture AT alimdemran turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture |