Cargando…

Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation

Titanium dental implants are used routinely, with surgical procedure, to replace missing teeth. Even though they lead to satisfactory results, novel developments with implant materials can still improve implant treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of porous tan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piglionico, Sofia, Bousquet, Julie, Fatima, Naveen, Renaud, Matthieu, Collart-Dutilleul, Pierre-Yves, Bousquet, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113657
_version_ 1783615588669587456
author Piglionico, Sofia
Bousquet, Julie
Fatima, Naveen
Renaud, Matthieu
Collart-Dutilleul, Pierre-Yves
Bousquet, Philippe
author_facet Piglionico, Sofia
Bousquet, Julie
Fatima, Naveen
Renaud, Matthieu
Collart-Dutilleul, Pierre-Yves
Bousquet, Philippe
author_sort Piglionico, Sofia
collection PubMed
description Titanium dental implants are used routinely, with surgical procedure, to replace missing teeth. Even though they lead to satisfactory results, novel developments with implant materials can still improve implant treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of porous tantalum (Ta) dental implants for osseointegration, in comparison to classical titanium (Ti). Mesenchymal stem cells from the dental pulp (DPSC) were incubated on Ta, smooth titanium (STi), and rough titanium (RTi) to assess their adhesion, proliferation, osteodifferentiation, and mineralized matrix production. Cell proliferation was measured at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h with MTT test. Early osteogenic differentiation was followed after 4, 8, 12 days by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) quantification. Cells organization and matrix microstructure were studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Collagen production and matrix mineralization were evaluated by immunostaining and histological staining. MTT test showed significantly higher proliferation of DPSC on Ta at 24 h and 48 h. However, APL quantification after 8 and 12 days was significantly lower for Ta, revealing a delayed differentiation, where cells were proliferating the more. After 3 weeks, collagen immunostaining showed an efficient production of collagen on all samples. However, Red Alizarin staining clearly revealed a higher calcification on Ta. The overall results tend to demonstrate that DPSC differentiation is delayed on Ta surface, due to a longer proliferation period until cells cover the 3D porous Ta structure. However, after 3 weeks, a more abundant mineralized matrix is produced on and inside Ta implants. Cell populations on porous Ta proliferate greater and faster, leading to the production of more calcium phosphate deposits than cells on roughened and smooth titanium surfaces, revealing a potential enhanced capacity for osseointegration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76973562020-11-29 Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation Piglionico, Sofia Bousquet, Julie Fatima, Naveen Renaud, Matthieu Collart-Dutilleul, Pierre-Yves Bousquet, Philippe J Clin Med Article Titanium dental implants are used routinely, with surgical procedure, to replace missing teeth. Even though they lead to satisfactory results, novel developments with implant materials can still improve implant treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of porous tantalum (Ta) dental implants for osseointegration, in comparison to classical titanium (Ti). Mesenchymal stem cells from the dental pulp (DPSC) were incubated on Ta, smooth titanium (STi), and rough titanium (RTi) to assess their adhesion, proliferation, osteodifferentiation, and mineralized matrix production. Cell proliferation was measured at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h with MTT test. Early osteogenic differentiation was followed after 4, 8, 12 days by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) quantification. Cells organization and matrix microstructure were studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Collagen production and matrix mineralization were evaluated by immunostaining and histological staining. MTT test showed significantly higher proliferation of DPSC on Ta at 24 h and 48 h. However, APL quantification after 8 and 12 days was significantly lower for Ta, revealing a delayed differentiation, where cells were proliferating the more. After 3 weeks, collagen immunostaining showed an efficient production of collagen on all samples. However, Red Alizarin staining clearly revealed a higher calcification on Ta. The overall results tend to demonstrate that DPSC differentiation is delayed on Ta surface, due to a longer proliferation period until cells cover the 3D porous Ta structure. However, after 3 weeks, a more abundant mineralized matrix is produced on and inside Ta implants. Cell populations on porous Ta proliferate greater and faster, leading to the production of more calcium phosphate deposits than cells on roughened and smooth titanium surfaces, revealing a potential enhanced capacity for osseointegration. MDPI 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7697356/ /pubmed/33203015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113657 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Piglionico, Sofia
Bousquet, Julie
Fatima, Naveen
Renaud, Matthieu
Collart-Dutilleul, Pierre-Yves
Bousquet, Philippe
Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title_full Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title_fullStr Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title_short Porous Tantalum vs. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation
title_sort porous tantalum vs. titanium implants: enhanced mineralized matrix formation after stem cells proliferation and differentiation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113657
work_keys_str_mv AT piglionicosofia poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation
AT bousquetjulie poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation
AT fatimanaveen poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation
AT renaudmatthieu poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation
AT collartdutilleulpierreyves poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation
AT bousquetphilippe poroustantalumvstitaniumimplantsenhancedmineralizedmatrixformationafterstemcellsproliferationanddifferentiation