Cargando…

UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

This study aimed to bring together people who smoke or vape, people who do not smoke and healthcare professionals to identify and agree priorities for electronic cigarette research in the UK. We carried out a priority setting partnership, guided by the methodology developed by the James Lind Allianc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunter, Abby, Ross, Louise, Gronlund, Toto, Cooper, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33212770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228500
_version_ 1783615628901351424
author Hunter, Abby
Ross, Louise
Gronlund, Toto
Cooper, Sue
author_facet Hunter, Abby
Ross, Louise
Gronlund, Toto
Cooper, Sue
author_sort Hunter, Abby
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to bring together people who smoke or vape, people who do not smoke and healthcare professionals to identify and agree priorities for electronic cigarette research in the UK. We carried out a priority setting partnership, guided by the methodology developed by the James Lind Alliance involving five key stages: initiation, consultation, collation, prioritisation and dissemination. A total of 765 people submitted 1887 questions that they wanted answered by research. Questions were organised into themes, merged and rewritten as summary questions, with 52 unique questions going forward to the prioritisation survey. Participants then ranked their top 10 questions. Following this ranking exercise, the top 26 were identified by selecting the most frequently prioritised questions adjusting for representative stakeholder group. These were put forward for discussion in the final prioritisation workshop, whereby the top 10 electronic cigarette research questions were agreed. The list of priorities identified will be of interest to researchers and funders of electronic cigarette research and will hopefully direct future research and funding calls. These priorities provide insight into the questions that matter to people who are using or concerned about e-cigarettes, including frontline professionals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76975792020-11-29 UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership Hunter, Abby Ross, Louise Gronlund, Toto Cooper, Sue Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study aimed to bring together people who smoke or vape, people who do not smoke and healthcare professionals to identify and agree priorities for electronic cigarette research in the UK. We carried out a priority setting partnership, guided by the methodology developed by the James Lind Alliance involving five key stages: initiation, consultation, collation, prioritisation and dissemination. A total of 765 people submitted 1887 questions that they wanted answered by research. Questions were organised into themes, merged and rewritten as summary questions, with 52 unique questions going forward to the prioritisation survey. Participants then ranked their top 10 questions. Following this ranking exercise, the top 26 were identified by selecting the most frequently prioritised questions adjusting for representative stakeholder group. These were put forward for discussion in the final prioritisation workshop, whereby the top 10 electronic cigarette research questions were agreed. The list of priorities identified will be of interest to researchers and funders of electronic cigarette research and will hopefully direct future research and funding calls. These priorities provide insight into the questions that matter to people who are using or concerned about e-cigarettes, including frontline professionals. MDPI 2020-11-17 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7697579/ /pubmed/33212770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228500 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hunter, Abby
Ross, Louise
Gronlund, Toto
Cooper, Sue
UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title_full UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title_fullStr UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title_full_unstemmed UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title_short UK Research Priorities for Electronic Cigarettes: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
title_sort uk research priorities for electronic cigarettes: a james lind alliance priority setting partnership
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33212770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228500
work_keys_str_mv AT hunterabby ukresearchprioritiesforelectroniccigarettesajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership
AT rosslouise ukresearchprioritiesforelectroniccigarettesajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership
AT gronlundtoto ukresearchprioritiesforelectroniccigarettesajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership
AT coopersue ukresearchprioritiesforelectroniccigarettesajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnership