Cargando…

Circular RNA, the Key for Translation

It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prats, Anne-Catherine, David, Florian, Diallo, Leila H., Roussel, Emilie, Tatin, Florence, Garmy-Susini, Barbara, Lacazette, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591
_version_ 1783615636257112064
author Prats, Anne-Catherine
David, Florian
Diallo, Leila H.
Roussel, Emilie
Tatin, Florence
Garmy-Susini, Barbara
Lacazette, Eric
author_facet Prats, Anne-Catherine
David, Florian
Diallo, Leila H.
Roussel, Emilie
Tatin, Florence
Garmy-Susini, Barbara
Lacazette, Eric
author_sort Prats, Anne-Catherine
collection PubMed
description It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “noncoding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5′ end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3′–5′ interaction have been reported, including m(6)A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and noncovalently closed circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA with circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76976092020-11-29 Circular RNA, the Key for Translation Prats, Anne-Catherine David, Florian Diallo, Leila H. Roussel, Emilie Tatin, Florence Garmy-Susini, Barbara Lacazette, Eric Int J Mol Sci Review It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “noncoding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5′ end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3′–5′ interaction have been reported, including m(6)A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and noncovalently closed circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA with circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications. MDPI 2020-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7697609/ /pubmed/33202605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Prats, Anne-Catherine
David, Florian
Diallo, Leila H.
Roussel, Emilie
Tatin, Florence
Garmy-Susini, Barbara
Lacazette, Eric
Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title_full Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title_fullStr Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title_full_unstemmed Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title_short Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
title_sort circular rna, the key for translation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591
work_keys_str_mv AT pratsannecatherine circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT davidflorian circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT dialloleilah circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT rousselemilie circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT tatinflorence circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT garmysusinibarbara circularrnathekeyfortranslation
AT lacazetteeric circularrnathekeyfortranslation