Cargando…
Circular RNA, the Key for Translation
It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591 |
_version_ | 1783615636257112064 |
---|---|
author | Prats, Anne-Catherine David, Florian Diallo, Leila H. Roussel, Emilie Tatin, Florence Garmy-Susini, Barbara Lacazette, Eric |
author_facet | Prats, Anne-Catherine David, Florian Diallo, Leila H. Roussel, Emilie Tatin, Florence Garmy-Susini, Barbara Lacazette, Eric |
author_sort | Prats, Anne-Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “noncoding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5′ end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3′–5′ interaction have been reported, including m(6)A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and noncovalently closed circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA with circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7697609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76976092020-11-29 Circular RNA, the Key for Translation Prats, Anne-Catherine David, Florian Diallo, Leila H. Roussel, Emilie Tatin, Florence Garmy-Susini, Barbara Lacazette, Eric Int J Mol Sci Review It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m(6)A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “noncoding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5′ end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3′–5′ interaction have been reported, including m(6)A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and noncovalently closed circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA with circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications. MDPI 2020-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7697609/ /pubmed/33202605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Prats, Anne-Catherine David, Florian Diallo, Leila H. Roussel, Emilie Tatin, Florence Garmy-Susini, Barbara Lacazette, Eric Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title | Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title_full | Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title_fullStr | Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title_full_unstemmed | Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title_short | Circular RNA, the Key for Translation |
title_sort | circular rna, the key for translation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pratsannecatherine circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT davidflorian circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT dialloleilah circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT rousselemilie circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT tatinflorence circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT garmysusinibarbara circularrnathekeyfortranslation AT lacazetteeric circularrnathekeyfortranslation |