Cargando…
Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction: Neck pain is a condition with a high incidence in primary care. Patients with chronic neck pain often experience reduction in neck mobility. However, no study to date has investigated the effects of manual mobilization of the upper cervical spine in patients with chronic mechanical nec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228334 |
_version_ | 1783615687177011200 |
---|---|
author | González-Rueda, Vanessa Hidalgo-García, César Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Bueno-Gracia, Elena Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Rodríguez-Rubio, Pere Ramón López-de-Celis, Carlos |
author_facet | González-Rueda, Vanessa Hidalgo-García, César Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Bueno-Gracia, Elena Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Rodríguez-Rubio, Pere Ramón López-de-Celis, Carlos |
author_sort | González-Rueda, Vanessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Neck pain is a condition with a high incidence in primary care. Patients with chronic neck pain often experience reduction in neck mobility. However, no study to date has investigated the effects of manual mobilization of the upper cervical spine in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding an upper cervical translatoric mobilization or an inhibitory suboccipital technique to a conventional physical therapy protocol in patients with chronic neck pain test on disability and cervical range of motion. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with chronic neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation were randomized in three groups: Upper cervical translatoric mobilization group, inhibitory suboccipital technique group, or control group. The neck disability index, active cervical mobility, and the flexion–rotation test were assessed at baseline (T0), after the treatment (T1), and at three-month follow-up (T2). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in neck disability index. The upper cervical translatoric mobilization group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the more restricted side at T1 (F = 5.992; p < 0.004) and T2 (F = 5.212; p < 0.007) compared to the control group. The inhibitory suboccipital technique group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the less restricted side at T1 (F = 3.590; p < 0.027). All groups presented high percentages of negative flexion–rotation tests. (T1: 69.2% upper neck translator mobilization group; 38.5% suboccipital inhibition technique group, 19.2% control group; at T2: 80.8%; 46.2% and 26.9% respectively). No significant differences in the active cervical mobility were found between groups. Conclusion: Adding manual therapy to a conventional physical therapy protocol for the upper cervical spine increased the flexion–rotation test in the short- and mid-term in patients with chronic neck pain. No changes were found in the neck disability index and the global active cervical range of motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7697824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76978242020-11-29 Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial González-Rueda, Vanessa Hidalgo-García, César Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Bueno-Gracia, Elena Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Rodríguez-Rubio, Pere Ramón López-de-Celis, Carlos Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Neck pain is a condition with a high incidence in primary care. Patients with chronic neck pain often experience reduction in neck mobility. However, no study to date has investigated the effects of manual mobilization of the upper cervical spine in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adding an upper cervical translatoric mobilization or an inhibitory suboccipital technique to a conventional physical therapy protocol in patients with chronic neck pain test on disability and cervical range of motion. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with chronic neck pain and restricted upper cervical rotation were randomized in three groups: Upper cervical translatoric mobilization group, inhibitory suboccipital technique group, or control group. The neck disability index, active cervical mobility, and the flexion–rotation test were assessed at baseline (T0), after the treatment (T1), and at three-month follow-up (T2). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in neck disability index. The upper cervical translatoric mobilization group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the more restricted side at T1 (F = 5.992; p < 0.004) and T2 (F = 5.212; p < 0.007) compared to the control group. The inhibitory suboccipital technique group showed a significant increase in the flexion–rotation test to the less restricted side at T1 (F = 3.590; p < 0.027). All groups presented high percentages of negative flexion–rotation tests. (T1: 69.2% upper neck translator mobilization group; 38.5% suboccipital inhibition technique group, 19.2% control group; at T2: 80.8%; 46.2% and 26.9% respectively). No significant differences in the active cervical mobility were found between groups. Conclusion: Adding manual therapy to a conventional physical therapy protocol for the upper cervical spine increased the flexion–rotation test in the short- and mid-term in patients with chronic neck pain. No changes were found in the neck disability index and the global active cervical range of motion. MDPI 2020-11-11 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7697824/ /pubmed/33187167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228334 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article González-Rueda, Vanessa Hidalgo-García, César Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Bueno-Gracia, Elena Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Rodríguez-Rubio, Pere Ramón López-de-Celis, Carlos Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Does Upper Cervical Manual Therapy Provide Additional Benefit in Disability and Mobility over a Physiotherapy Primary Care Program for Chronic Cervicalgia? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | does upper cervical manual therapy provide additional benefit in disability and mobility over a physiotherapy primary care program for chronic cervicalgia? a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalezruedavanessa doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hidalgogarciacesar doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rodriguezsanzjacobo doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT buenograciaelena doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT perezbellmuntalbert doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rodriguezrubiopereramon doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lopezdeceliscarlos doesuppercervicalmanualtherapyprovideadditionalbenefitindisabilityandmobilityoveraphysiotherapyprimarycareprogramforchroniccervicalgiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial |