Cargando…

Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Workman, Craig D., Fietsam, Alexandra C., Ponto, Laura L. Boles, Kamholz, John, Rudroff, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110855
_version_ 1783615688850538496
author Workman, Craig D.
Fietsam, Alexandra C.
Ponto, Laura L. Boles
Kamholz, John
Rudroff, Thorsten
author_facet Workman, Craig D.
Fietsam, Alexandra C.
Ponto, Laura L. Boles
Kamholz, John
Rudroff, Thorsten
author_sort Workman, Craig D.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the brain. This study reports individual cerebral blood flow responses in people with multiple sclerosis and neurologically healthy subjects that experienced 5 min of anodal tDCS at 1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, and 4 mA over either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the primary motor cortex (M1). The most notable results indicated anticipated changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in two regions of one DLPFC subject (2 mA condition), and expected changes in one M1 subject in the 2 mA and 4 mA conditions and in another M1 subject in the 2 mA condition. There were also changes contrary to the expected direction in one DLPFC subject and in two M1 subjects. These data suggest the effects of tDCS might be site-specific and highlight the high variability and individualized responses increasingly reported in tDCS literature. Future studies should use longer stimulation durations and image at various time points after stimulation cessation when exploring the effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76978312020-11-29 Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities Workman, Craig D. Fietsam, Alexandra C. Ponto, Laura L. Boles Kamholz, John Rudroff, Thorsten Brain Sci Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the brain. This study reports individual cerebral blood flow responses in people with multiple sclerosis and neurologically healthy subjects that experienced 5 min of anodal tDCS at 1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, and 4 mA over either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the primary motor cortex (M1). The most notable results indicated anticipated changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in two regions of one DLPFC subject (2 mA condition), and expected changes in one M1 subject in the 2 mA and 4 mA conditions and in another M1 subject in the 2 mA condition. There were also changes contrary to the expected direction in one DLPFC subject and in two M1 subjects. These data suggest the effects of tDCS might be site-specific and highlight the high variability and individualized responses increasingly reported in tDCS literature. Future studies should use longer stimulation durations and image at various time points after stimulation cessation when exploring the effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF). MDPI 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7697831/ /pubmed/33202753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110855 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Workman, Craig D.
Fietsam, Alexandra C.
Ponto, Laura L. Boles
Kamholz, John
Rudroff, Thorsten
Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_full Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_fullStr Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_full_unstemmed Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_short Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_sort individual cerebral blood flow responses to transcranial direct current stimulation at various intensities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33202753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110855
work_keys_str_mv AT workmancraigd individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT fietsamalexandrac individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT pontolauralboles individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT kamholzjohn individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT rudroffthorsten individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities