Cargando…

Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection

Sepsis was recently redefined as a life-threatening disease involving organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Biomarkers play an important role in early detection, diagnosis, and prognostication. We reviewed six promising biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Shang-Kai, Lan, Hao-Min, Han, Shih-Tsung, Wu, Chin-Chieh, Chen, Kuan-Fu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110494
_version_ 1783615709957324800
author Hung, Shang-Kai
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Wu, Chin-Chieh
Chen, Kuan-Fu
author_facet Hung, Shang-Kai
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Wu, Chin-Chieh
Chen, Kuan-Fu
author_sort Hung, Shang-Kai
collection PubMed
description Sepsis was recently redefined as a life-threatening disease involving organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Biomarkers play an important role in early detection, diagnosis, and prognostication. We reviewed six promising biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), CD64, presepsin, and sTREM-1. Among the recent studies, we found the following risks of bias: only a few studies adopted the random or consecutive sampling strategy; extensive case-control analysis, which worsened the over-estimated performance; most of the studies used post hoc cutoff values; and heterogeneity with respect to the inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, and different quantitative synthesis methods applied in meta-analyses. We recommend that CD64 and presepsin should be considered as the most promising biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis. Future studies should enroll a larger sample size with a cohort rather than a case-control study design. A random or consecutive study design with a pre-specified laboratory threshold, consistent sampling timing, and an updated definition of sepsis will also increase the reliability of the studies. Further investigations of appropriate specimens, testing assays, and cutoff levels for specific biomarkers are also warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7697922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76979222020-11-29 Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection Hung, Shang-Kai Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Wu, Chin-Chieh Chen, Kuan-Fu Biomedicines Review Sepsis was recently redefined as a life-threatening disease involving organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Biomarkers play an important role in early detection, diagnosis, and prognostication. We reviewed six promising biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection, including C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), CD64, presepsin, and sTREM-1. Among the recent studies, we found the following risks of bias: only a few studies adopted the random or consecutive sampling strategy; extensive case-control analysis, which worsened the over-estimated performance; most of the studies used post hoc cutoff values; and heterogeneity with respect to the inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, and different quantitative synthesis methods applied in meta-analyses. We recommend that CD64 and presepsin should be considered as the most promising biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis. Future studies should enroll a larger sample size with a cohort rather than a case-control study design. A random or consecutive study design with a pre-specified laboratory threshold, consistent sampling timing, and an updated definition of sepsis will also increase the reliability of the studies. Further investigations of appropriate specimens, testing assays, and cutoff levels for specific biomarkers are also warranted. MDPI 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7697922/ /pubmed/33198109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110494 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hung, Shang-Kai
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Wu, Chin-Chieh
Chen, Kuan-Fu
Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title_full Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title_fullStr Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title_full_unstemmed Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title_short Current Evidence and Limitation of Biomarkers for Detecting Sepsis and Systemic Infection
title_sort current evidence and limitation of biomarkers for detecting sepsis and systemic infection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8110494
work_keys_str_mv AT hungshangkai currentevidenceandlimitationofbiomarkersfordetectingsepsisandsystemicinfection
AT lanhaomin currentevidenceandlimitationofbiomarkersfordetectingsepsisandsystemicinfection
AT hanshihtsung currentevidenceandlimitationofbiomarkersfordetectingsepsisandsystemicinfection
AT wuchinchieh currentevidenceandlimitationofbiomarkersfordetectingsepsisandsystemicinfection
AT chenkuanfu currentevidenceandlimitationofbiomarkersfordetectingsepsisandsystemicinfection