Cargando…

Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?

The aim of our study was to investigate the cumulative effective dose of radiation resulting from medical imaging in orthopaedic patients with isolated extremity trauma. Deidentified radiology records of consecutive patients without age restriction with isolated extremity trauma requiring operative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheeler, James A., Weaver, Natasha, Balogh, Zsolt J., Drobetz, Herwig, Kovendy, Andrew, Enninghorst, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33182418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113609
_version_ 1783615759736373248
author Wheeler, James A.
Weaver, Natasha
Balogh, Zsolt J.
Drobetz, Herwig
Kovendy, Andrew
Enninghorst, Natalie
author_facet Wheeler, James A.
Weaver, Natasha
Balogh, Zsolt J.
Drobetz, Herwig
Kovendy, Andrew
Enninghorst, Natalie
author_sort Wheeler, James A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of our study was to investigate the cumulative effective dose of radiation resulting from medical imaging in orthopaedic patients with isolated extremity trauma. Deidentified radiology records of consecutive patients without age restriction with isolated extremity trauma requiring operative treatment at a regional hospital were reviewed retrospectively over a 1-year period, and the effective dose per patient for each study type of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, and operative fluoroscopy was used to calculate cumulative effective dose. Values were summarised as mean, ± standard deviation, maximum, and proportion with overdose (>20 mSv). The study cohort included 428 patients (193 male and 235 female) with an average age of 44 years (±28). There were 447 procedures performed, i.e., all involved operative fluoroscopy, 116 involved computed tomography, and 397 involved X-ray. The mean cumulative effective dose per patient was 1.96 mSv (±4.98, 45.12). The mean cumulative effective dose for operative fluoroscopy was 0.32 mSv (±0.73, 5.91), for X-ray was 1.12 mSv (±3.6, 39.23) and for computed tomography was 2.22 mSv (±4.13, 20.14). The mean cumulative effective dose of 1.96 mSv falls below the recommended maximum annual exposure of 20 mSv. This study can serve as a guide for informing clinicians and patients of the acceptable radiation risk in the context of isolated extremity trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7698133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76981332020-11-29 Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much? Wheeler, James A. Weaver, Natasha Balogh, Zsolt J. Drobetz, Herwig Kovendy, Andrew Enninghorst, Natalie J Clin Med Article The aim of our study was to investigate the cumulative effective dose of radiation resulting from medical imaging in orthopaedic patients with isolated extremity trauma. Deidentified radiology records of consecutive patients without age restriction with isolated extremity trauma requiring operative treatment at a regional hospital were reviewed retrospectively over a 1-year period, and the effective dose per patient for each study type of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, and operative fluoroscopy was used to calculate cumulative effective dose. Values were summarised as mean, ± standard deviation, maximum, and proportion with overdose (>20 mSv). The study cohort included 428 patients (193 male and 235 female) with an average age of 44 years (±28). There were 447 procedures performed, i.e., all involved operative fluoroscopy, 116 involved computed tomography, and 397 involved X-ray. The mean cumulative effective dose per patient was 1.96 mSv (±4.98, 45.12). The mean cumulative effective dose for operative fluoroscopy was 0.32 mSv (±0.73, 5.91), for X-ray was 1.12 mSv (±3.6, 39.23) and for computed tomography was 2.22 mSv (±4.13, 20.14). The mean cumulative effective dose of 1.96 mSv falls below the recommended maximum annual exposure of 20 mSv. This study can serve as a guide for informing clinicians and patients of the acceptable radiation risk in the context of isolated extremity trauma. MDPI 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7698133/ /pubmed/33182418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113609 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wheeler, James A.
Weaver, Natasha
Balogh, Zsolt J.
Drobetz, Herwig
Kovendy, Andrew
Enninghorst, Natalie
Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title_full Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title_fullStr Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title_short Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?
title_sort radiation exposure in patients with isolated limb trauma: acceptable or are we imaging too much?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33182418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113609
work_keys_str_mv AT wheelerjamesa radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch
AT weavernatasha radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch
AT baloghzsoltj radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch
AT drobetzherwig radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch
AT kovendyandrew radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch
AT enninghorstnatalie radiationexposureinpatientswithisolatedlimbtraumaacceptableorareweimagingtoomuch