Cargando…

Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review

Introduction: Biosimilars have the potential to enhance the sustainability of evolving health care systems. A sustainable biosimilars market requires all stakeholders to balance competition and supply chain security. However, there is significant variation in the policies for pricing, procurement, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vulto, Arnold G., Vanderpuye-Orgle, Jackie, van der Graaff, Martin, Simoens, Steven R. A., Dagna, Lorenzo, Macaulay, Richard, Majeed, Beenish, Lemay, Jeffrey, Hippenmeyer, Jane, Gonzalez-McQuire, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph13110400
_version_ 1783615862552395776
author Vulto, Arnold G.
Vanderpuye-Orgle, Jackie
van der Graaff, Martin
Simoens, Steven R. A.
Dagna, Lorenzo
Macaulay, Richard
Majeed, Beenish
Lemay, Jeffrey
Hippenmeyer, Jane
Gonzalez-McQuire, Sebastian
author_facet Vulto, Arnold G.
Vanderpuye-Orgle, Jackie
van der Graaff, Martin
Simoens, Steven R. A.
Dagna, Lorenzo
Macaulay, Richard
Majeed, Beenish
Lemay, Jeffrey
Hippenmeyer, Jane
Gonzalez-McQuire, Sebastian
author_sort Vulto, Arnold G.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Biosimilars have the potential to enhance the sustainability of evolving health care systems. A sustainable biosimilars market requires all stakeholders to balance competition and supply chain security. However, there is significant variation in the policies for pricing, procurement, and use of biosimilars in the European Union. A modified Delphi process was conducted to achieve expert consensus on biosimilar market sustainability in Europe. Methods: The priorities of 11 stakeholders were explored in three stages: a brainstorming stage supported by a systematic literature review (SLR) and key materials identified by the participants; development and review of statements derived during brainstorming; and a facilitated roundtable discussion. Results: Participants argued that a sustainable biosimilar market must deliver tangible and transparent benefits to the health care system, while meeting the needs of all stakeholders. Key drivers of biosimilar market sustainability included: (i) competition is more effective than regulation; (ii) there should be incentives to ensure industry investment in biosimilar development and innovation; (iii) procurement processes must avoid monopolies and minimize market disruption; and (iv) principles for procurement should be defined by all stakeholders. However, findings from the SLR were limited, with significant gaps on the impact of different tender models on supply risks, savings, and sustainability. Conclusions: A sustainable biosimilar market means that all stakeholders benefit from appropriate and reliable access to biological therapies. Failure to care for biosimilar market sustainability may impoverish biosimilar development and offerings, eventually leading to increased cost for health care systems and patients, with fewer resources for innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7698572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76985722020-11-29 Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review Vulto, Arnold G. Vanderpuye-Orgle, Jackie van der Graaff, Martin Simoens, Steven R. A. Dagna, Lorenzo Macaulay, Richard Majeed, Beenish Lemay, Jeffrey Hippenmeyer, Jane Gonzalez-McQuire, Sebastian Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Review Introduction: Biosimilars have the potential to enhance the sustainability of evolving health care systems. A sustainable biosimilars market requires all stakeholders to balance competition and supply chain security. However, there is significant variation in the policies for pricing, procurement, and use of biosimilars in the European Union. A modified Delphi process was conducted to achieve expert consensus on biosimilar market sustainability in Europe. Methods: The priorities of 11 stakeholders were explored in three stages: a brainstorming stage supported by a systematic literature review (SLR) and key materials identified by the participants; development and review of statements derived during brainstorming; and a facilitated roundtable discussion. Results: Participants argued that a sustainable biosimilar market must deliver tangible and transparent benefits to the health care system, while meeting the needs of all stakeholders. Key drivers of biosimilar market sustainability included: (i) competition is more effective than regulation; (ii) there should be incentives to ensure industry investment in biosimilar development and innovation; (iii) procurement processes must avoid monopolies and minimize market disruption; and (iv) principles for procurement should be defined by all stakeholders. However, findings from the SLR were limited, with significant gaps on the impact of different tender models on supply risks, savings, and sustainability. Conclusions: A sustainable biosimilar market means that all stakeholders benefit from appropriate and reliable access to biological therapies. Failure to care for biosimilar market sustainability may impoverish biosimilar development and offerings, eventually leading to increased cost for health care systems and patients, with fewer resources for innovation. MDPI 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7698572/ /pubmed/33213079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph13110400 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vulto, Arnold G.
Vanderpuye-Orgle, Jackie
van der Graaff, Martin
Simoens, Steven R. A.
Dagna, Lorenzo
Macaulay, Richard
Majeed, Beenish
Lemay, Jeffrey
Hippenmeyer, Jane
Gonzalez-McQuire, Sebastian
Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title_full Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title_short Sustainability of Biosimilars in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus with Systematic Literature Review
title_sort sustainability of biosimilars in europe: a delphi panel consensus with systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph13110400
work_keys_str_mv AT vultoarnoldg sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT vanderpuyeorglejackie sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT vandergraaffmartin sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT simoensstevenra sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT dagnalorenzo sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT macaulayrichard sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT majeedbeenish sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT lemayjeffrey sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT hippenmeyerjane sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview
AT gonzalezmcquiresebastian sustainabilityofbiosimilarsineuropeadelphipanelconsensuswithsystematicliteraturereview