New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Pathology Committee Grading System for the Prognostic Outcome of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study investigated the association between survival outcome and the new grading system among advanced stage lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) (stages IIIA, IIIB and IV) patients who were diagnosed as LADC with a pathologic report according to a new grading system by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) pathology committee. The results indicate that the poorly differentiated group had a poorer prognosis in PFS, as did patients with wild-type EGFR who were treated with chemotherapy. No survival difference could be found among EGFR mutation patients. Older age and a lower body mass index also led to worse survival. Patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma likewise had worse survival, especially compared to those with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Our findings highlight that the therapeutic regimen should be adjusted for wild-type EGFR patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy to provide better outcomes. No survival difference could be seen among EGFR mutation patients. ABSTRACT: The impact of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology committee grading system for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) on survival is unclear, especially in Asian populations. In this study, we reviewed the prognostic outcomes of patients with late-stage disease according to the new grading system. We reviewed 136 LADC cases who underwent a small biopsy from 2007 to 2018. Tumors were classified according to the new grading system for LADC. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, and driver gene mutations) were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine correlations with the new grading system and prognosis. Patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma were significantly correlated with a poor progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.013) but not overall survival (OS) (p = 0.154). Subgroup analysis showed that wild-type EGFR patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy had significantly worse PFS (p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in survival among the patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients aged >70 years and those with a BMI ≤ 25 kg/m(2) and wild-type patients had significantly worse OS in both univariate (HR = 1.822, p = 0.006; HR = 2.250, p = 0.004; HR = 1.537, p = 0.046, respectively) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.984, p = 0.002; HR = 2.383, p = 0.002; HR = 1.632, p = 0.028, respectively). Despite therapy, patients with poorly differentiated tumors still fared worse than those with better differentiated tumors. No differences were found among the EGFR mutations treated with TKI. Our findings highlight that the therapeutic regimen should be adjusted for EGFR Wild-type patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy to provide better outcomes.