Cargando…
Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China
Thermal power generation based on coal-fired power plants has the advantages of stability and controllability and has been the largest source of electricity supply in China. Coal-fired power plants, however, are also accompanied by high carbon emissions and the release of harmful substances (mainly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33218109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228555 |
_version_ | 1783615943966982144 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Penghao Xia, Senmao Xiong, Yu Liu, Chaoyang Li, Fei Liang, Jiamin Zhang, Huarong |
author_facet | Ye, Penghao Xia, Senmao Xiong, Yu Liu, Chaoyang Li, Fei Liang, Jiamin Zhang, Huarong |
author_sort | Ye, Penghao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Thermal power generation based on coal-fired power plants has the advantages of stability and controllability and has been the largest source of electricity supply in China. Coal-fired power plants, however, are also accompanied by high carbon emissions and the release of harmful substances (mainly including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust), and are even regarded as the “chief criminal” in terms of air pollution. However, thermal power is also a pioneering industry involved in several environmental regulations and cleaner production techniques before other industries. Evidence of this is China’s ultra-low emissions (ULE) policy on coal-fired power plants, implemented in 2015. To verify this policy’s effect, this study treats ULE as an exogenous impact variable, examining its emissions reduction effect on SO(2), NO(x), and smoke dust in Eastern and Central China using the difference-in-difference method (DID). The results show that the total emissions of the three pollutants were abated by 0.133%, 0.057% and 0.036% in Eastern, and by 0.120%, 0.035% and 0.043% in Central China at every 1% rise of thermal power generated after ULE. In addition, several other factors can also argue for the promotion of thermal power. Other industries, such as steel or chemical, have proven that they can contribute significant SO(2) and NO(x) emissions. Based on these results, we provide suggestions on synergistic emissions reduction among multiple industries, as well as a discussion on the necessity of implementing ULE in Western China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7698952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76989522020-11-29 Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China Ye, Penghao Xia, Senmao Xiong, Yu Liu, Chaoyang Li, Fei Liang, Jiamin Zhang, Huarong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Thermal power generation based on coal-fired power plants has the advantages of stability and controllability and has been the largest source of electricity supply in China. Coal-fired power plants, however, are also accompanied by high carbon emissions and the release of harmful substances (mainly including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust), and are even regarded as the “chief criminal” in terms of air pollution. However, thermal power is also a pioneering industry involved in several environmental regulations and cleaner production techniques before other industries. Evidence of this is China’s ultra-low emissions (ULE) policy on coal-fired power plants, implemented in 2015. To verify this policy’s effect, this study treats ULE as an exogenous impact variable, examining its emissions reduction effect on SO(2), NO(x), and smoke dust in Eastern and Central China using the difference-in-difference method (DID). The results show that the total emissions of the three pollutants were abated by 0.133%, 0.057% and 0.036% in Eastern, and by 0.120%, 0.035% and 0.043% in Central China at every 1% rise of thermal power generated after ULE. In addition, several other factors can also argue for the promotion of thermal power. Other industries, such as steel or chemical, have proven that they can contribute significant SO(2) and NO(x) emissions. Based on these results, we provide suggestions on synergistic emissions reduction among multiple industries, as well as a discussion on the necessity of implementing ULE in Western China. MDPI 2020-11-18 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7698952/ /pubmed/33218109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228555 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ye, Penghao Xia, Senmao Xiong, Yu Liu, Chaoyang Li, Fei Liang, Jiamin Zhang, Huarong Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title | Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title_full | Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title_fullStr | Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title_short | Did an Ultra-Low Emissions Policy on Coal-Fueled Thermal Power Reduce the Harmful Emissions? Evidence from Three Typical Air Pollutants Abatement in China |
title_sort | did an ultra-low emissions policy on coal-fueled thermal power reduce the harmful emissions? evidence from three typical air pollutants abatement in china |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33218109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yepenghao didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT xiasenmao didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT xiongyu didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT liuchaoyang didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT lifei didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT liangjiamin didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina AT zhanghuarong didanultralowemissionspolicyoncoalfueledthermalpowerreducetheharmfulemissionsevidencefromthreetypicalairpollutantsabatementinchina |