Cargando…

Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels

Background: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janicijevic, Danica, Knezevic, Olivera M., Garcia-Ramos, Amador, Cvetic, Danilo, Mirkov, Dragan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33227905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228570
_version_ 1783615981650706432
author Janicijevic, Danica
Knezevic, Olivera M.
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Cvetic, Danilo
Mirkov, Dragan M.
author_facet Janicijevic, Danica
Knezevic, Olivera M.
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Cvetic, Danilo
Mirkov, Dragan M.
author_sort Janicijevic, Danica
collection PubMed
description Background: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels. Methods: The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [F(0)], maximum velocity [v(0)], and maximum power [P(max)]). Results: F(0) and P(max) were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while v(0) was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher F(0) for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher P(max) for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36). Conclusions: The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7699145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76991452020-11-29 Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels Janicijevic, Danica Knezevic, Olivera M. Garcia-Ramos, Amador Cvetic, Danilo Mirkov, Dragan M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels. Methods: The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [F(0)], maximum velocity [v(0)], and maximum power [P(max)]). Results: F(0) and P(max) were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while v(0) was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher F(0) for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher P(max) for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36). Conclusions: The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint. MDPI 2020-11-19 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7699145/ /pubmed/33227905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228570 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Janicijevic, Danica
Knezevic, Olivera M.
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Cvetic, Danilo
Mirkov, Dragan M.
Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title_full Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title_fullStr Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title_full_unstemmed Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title_short Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels
title_sort isokinetic testing: sensitivity of the force-velocity relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between muscle groups and participants’ physical activity levels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33227905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228570
work_keys_str_mv AT janicijevicdanica isokinetictestingsensitivityoftheforcevelocityrelationshipassessedthroughthetwopointmethodtodiscriminatebetweenmusclegroupsandparticipantsphysicalactivitylevels
AT knezevicoliveram isokinetictestingsensitivityoftheforcevelocityrelationshipassessedthroughthetwopointmethodtodiscriminatebetweenmusclegroupsandparticipantsphysicalactivitylevels
AT garciaramosamador isokinetictestingsensitivityoftheforcevelocityrelationshipassessedthroughthetwopointmethodtodiscriminatebetweenmusclegroupsandparticipantsphysicalactivitylevels
AT cveticdanilo isokinetictestingsensitivityoftheforcevelocityrelationshipassessedthroughthetwopointmethodtodiscriminatebetweenmusclegroupsandparticipantsphysicalactivitylevels
AT mirkovdraganm isokinetictestingsensitivityoftheforcevelocityrelationshipassessedthroughthetwopointmethodtodiscriminatebetweenmusclegroupsandparticipantsphysicalactivitylevels