Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel

This paper presents an experimental study into the comparative response of wiper and round-nose conventional carbide inserts coated with TiCN + AL(2)O(3) + TiN when turning an AISI 4340 steel alloy. The optimal process parameters, as identified by pre-experiments, were used for both types of inserts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbas, Adel T., Anwar, Saqib, Hegab, Hussien, Benyahia, Faycal, Ali, Hazem, Elkaseer, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225233
_version_ 1783616043538710528
author Abbas, Adel T.
Anwar, Saqib
Hegab, Hussien
Benyahia, Faycal
Ali, Hazem
Elkaseer, Ahmed
author_facet Abbas, Adel T.
Anwar, Saqib
Hegab, Hussien
Benyahia, Faycal
Ali, Hazem
Elkaseer, Ahmed
author_sort Abbas, Adel T.
collection PubMed
description This paper presents an experimental study into the comparative response of wiper and round-nose conventional carbide inserts coated with TiCN + AL(2)O(3) + TiN when turning an AISI 4340 steel alloy. The optimal process parameters, as identified by pre-experiments, were used for both types of inserts to determine the machined surface quality, tool wear, and specific cutting energy for different cutting lengths. The wiper inserts provided a substantial improvement in the attainable surface quality compared with the results obtained using conventional inserts under optimal cutting conditions for the entire range of the machined lengths. In addition, the conventional inserts showed a dramatic increase in roughness with an increased length of the cut, while the wiper inserts showed only a minor increase for the same length of cut. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the wear for both types of inserts. Conventional inserts showed higher trends for both the average and maximum flank wear with cutting length compared to the wiper inserts, except for lengths of 200–400 mm, where conventional inserts showed less average flank wear. A higher accumulation of deposited chips was observed on the flank face of the wiper inserts than the conventional inserts. The experimental results demonstrated that edge chipping was the chief tool wear mechanism on the rake face for both types of insert, with more edge chipping observed in the case of the conventional inserts than the wiper inserts, with negligible evidence of crater wear in either case. The wiper inserts were shown to have a higher specific cutting energy than those detected with conventional inserts. This was attributed to (i) the irregular nose feature of the wiper inserts differing from the simpler round nose geometry of the conventional inserts and (ii) a higher tendency of chip accumulation on the wiper inserts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7699413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76994132020-11-29 Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel Abbas, Adel T. Anwar, Saqib Hegab, Hussien Benyahia, Faycal Ali, Hazem Elkaseer, Ahmed Materials (Basel) Article This paper presents an experimental study into the comparative response of wiper and round-nose conventional carbide inserts coated with TiCN + AL(2)O(3) + TiN when turning an AISI 4340 steel alloy. The optimal process parameters, as identified by pre-experiments, were used for both types of inserts to determine the machined surface quality, tool wear, and specific cutting energy for different cutting lengths. The wiper inserts provided a substantial improvement in the attainable surface quality compared with the results obtained using conventional inserts under optimal cutting conditions for the entire range of the machined lengths. In addition, the conventional inserts showed a dramatic increase in roughness with an increased length of the cut, while the wiper inserts showed only a minor increase for the same length of cut. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the wear for both types of inserts. Conventional inserts showed higher trends for both the average and maximum flank wear with cutting length compared to the wiper inserts, except for lengths of 200–400 mm, where conventional inserts showed less average flank wear. A higher accumulation of deposited chips was observed on the flank face of the wiper inserts than the conventional inserts. The experimental results demonstrated that edge chipping was the chief tool wear mechanism on the rake face for both types of insert, with more edge chipping observed in the case of the conventional inserts than the wiper inserts, with negligible evidence of crater wear in either case. The wiper inserts were shown to have a higher specific cutting energy than those detected with conventional inserts. This was attributed to (i) the irregular nose feature of the wiper inserts differing from the simpler round nose geometry of the conventional inserts and (ii) a higher tendency of chip accumulation on the wiper inserts. MDPI 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7699413/ /pubmed/33228121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225233 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abbas, Adel T.
Anwar, Saqib
Hegab, Hussien
Benyahia, Faycal
Ali, Hazem
Elkaseer, Ahmed
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Surface Quality, Tool Wear, and Specific Cutting Energy for Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel
title_sort comparative evaluation of surface quality, tool wear, and specific cutting energy for wiper and conventional carbide inserts in hard turning of aisi 4340 alloy steel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225233
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasadelt comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel
AT anwarsaqib comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel
AT hegabhussien comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel
AT benyahiafaycal comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel
AT alihazem comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel
AT elkaseerahmed comparativeevaluationofsurfacequalitytoolwearandspecificcuttingenergyforwiperandconventionalcarbideinsertsinhardturningofaisi4340alloysteel