Cargando…

Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse

The aim of this study focused on the evaluation of constructed wetlands (CWs) microcosms, on a laboratory scale, for the removal of metals from a pig industry effluent while maintaining effluent organic matter and nutrients levels for its later used as a fertilizer. CWs with different macrophytes (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dias, Sofia, Mucha, Ana P., Duarte Crespo, Rute, Rodrigues, Pedro, Almeida, C. Marisa R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228592
_version_ 1783616046681292800
author Dias, Sofia
Mucha, Ana P.
Duarte Crespo, Rute
Rodrigues, Pedro
Almeida, C. Marisa R.
author_facet Dias, Sofia
Mucha, Ana P.
Duarte Crespo, Rute
Rodrigues, Pedro
Almeida, C. Marisa R.
author_sort Dias, Sofia
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study focused on the evaluation of constructed wetlands (CWs) microcosms, on a laboratory scale, for the removal of metals from a pig industry effluent while maintaining effluent organic matter and nutrients levels for its later used as a fertilizer. CWs with different macrophytes (Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia) and different substrates (light expanded clay aggregate and lava rock) were tested. Results showed high removals of metals during CWs treatment, with removal rates reaching >80% for Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn after 2 days of treatment in CWs planted with T. latifolia and >60% in CWs planted with P. australis. Significant differences were only found between substrates for Fe and Mn in CWs with P. australis. Removal of organic matter (through chemical oxygen demand (COD)) was >77%, with no significant differences between substrates or plants. Removals of ammonium and phosphate ions ranged between 59–84% and 32–92%, respectively, in CWs with P. australis and 62–75% and 7–68% in CWs with T. latifolia, with no significant differences between substrates. Overall, CWs showed potential to be efficient in removing toxic contaminants, as metals, while maintaining moderated levels of nutrients, allowing the use of reclaimed water in agriculture, namely as fertilizer. If one aims for a short CW treatment, CW planted with T. latifolia and expanded clay as substrate could be the more suitable choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7699426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76994262020-11-29 Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse Dias, Sofia Mucha, Ana P. Duarte Crespo, Rute Rodrigues, Pedro Almeida, C. Marisa R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this study focused on the evaluation of constructed wetlands (CWs) microcosms, on a laboratory scale, for the removal of metals from a pig industry effluent while maintaining effluent organic matter and nutrients levels for its later used as a fertilizer. CWs with different macrophytes (Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia) and different substrates (light expanded clay aggregate and lava rock) were tested. Results showed high removals of metals during CWs treatment, with removal rates reaching >80% for Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn after 2 days of treatment in CWs planted with T. latifolia and >60% in CWs planted with P. australis. Significant differences were only found between substrates for Fe and Mn in CWs with P. australis. Removal of organic matter (through chemical oxygen demand (COD)) was >77%, with no significant differences between substrates or plants. Removals of ammonium and phosphate ions ranged between 59–84% and 32–92%, respectively, in CWs with P. australis and 62–75% and 7–68% in CWs with T. latifolia, with no significant differences between substrates. Overall, CWs showed potential to be efficient in removing toxic contaminants, as metals, while maintaining moderated levels of nutrients, allowing the use of reclaimed water in agriculture, namely as fertilizer. If one aims for a short CW treatment, CW planted with T. latifolia and expanded clay as substrate could be the more suitable choice. MDPI 2020-11-19 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7699426/ /pubmed/33228045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228592 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dias, Sofia
Mucha, Ana P.
Duarte Crespo, Rute
Rodrigues, Pedro
Almeida, C. Marisa R.
Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title_full Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title_fullStr Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title_full_unstemmed Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title_short Livestock Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands for Agriculture Reuse
title_sort livestock wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands for agriculture reuse
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228592
work_keys_str_mv AT diassofia livestockwastewatertreatmentinconstructedwetlandsforagriculturereuse
AT muchaanap livestockwastewatertreatmentinconstructedwetlandsforagriculturereuse
AT duartecresporute livestockwastewatertreatmentinconstructedwetlandsforagriculturereuse
AT rodriguespedro livestockwastewatertreatmentinconstructedwetlandsforagriculturereuse
AT almeidacmarisar livestockwastewatertreatmentinconstructedwetlandsforagriculturereuse