Cargando…
Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells
The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers (CeraSeal and EndoSeal TCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH-Plus) in terms of cell viability, inflammatory response, expression of mesenchymal phenotype, osteogenic potential, cell attachment, and morpholog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33233519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225242 |
_version_ | 1783616086639378432 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Hanseul Kim, Egan Lee, Sukjoon Park, Soyeon Chen, Dongzi Shin, Su-Jung Kim, Euiseong Kim, Sunil |
author_facet | Oh, Hanseul Kim, Egan Lee, Sukjoon Park, Soyeon Chen, Dongzi Shin, Su-Jung Kim, Euiseong Kim, Sunil |
author_sort | Oh, Hanseul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers (CeraSeal and EndoSeal TCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH-Plus) in terms of cell viability, inflammatory response, expression of mesenchymal phenotype, osteogenic potential, cell attachment, and morphology, of human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs). hPDLSCs were acquired from the premolars (n = 4) of four subjects, whose ages extended from 16 to 24 years of age. Flow cytometry analysis showed stemness of hPDLSCs was maintained in all materials. In cell viability test, AH-Plus showed the lowest cell viability, and CeraSeal showed significantly higher cell viability than others. In ELISA test, AH-Plus showed higher expression of IL-6 and IL-8 than calcium silicate-based sealers. In an osteogenic potential test, AH-Plus showed a lower expression level than other material; however, EndoSeal TCS showed a better expression level than others. All experiments were repeated at least three times per cell line. Scanning electronic microscopy studies showed low degree of cell proliferation on AH-Plus, and high degree of cell proliferation on calcium silicate-based sealers. In this study, calcium silicate-based sealers appear to be more biocompatible and less cytotoxic than epoxy-resin based sealers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7699603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76996032020-11-29 Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Oh, Hanseul Kim, Egan Lee, Sukjoon Park, Soyeon Chen, Dongzi Shin, Su-Jung Kim, Euiseong Kim, Sunil Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers (CeraSeal and EndoSeal TCS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH-Plus) in terms of cell viability, inflammatory response, expression of mesenchymal phenotype, osteogenic potential, cell attachment, and morphology, of human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs). hPDLSCs were acquired from the premolars (n = 4) of four subjects, whose ages extended from 16 to 24 years of age. Flow cytometry analysis showed stemness of hPDLSCs was maintained in all materials. In cell viability test, AH-Plus showed the lowest cell viability, and CeraSeal showed significantly higher cell viability than others. In ELISA test, AH-Plus showed higher expression of IL-6 and IL-8 than calcium silicate-based sealers. In an osteogenic potential test, AH-Plus showed a lower expression level than other material; however, EndoSeal TCS showed a better expression level than others. All experiments were repeated at least three times per cell line. Scanning electronic microscopy studies showed low degree of cell proliferation on AH-Plus, and high degree of cell proliferation on calcium silicate-based sealers. In this study, calcium silicate-based sealers appear to be more biocompatible and less cytotoxic than epoxy-resin based sealers. MDPI 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7699603/ /pubmed/33233519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225242 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Oh, Hanseul Kim, Egan Lee, Sukjoon Park, Soyeon Chen, Dongzi Shin, Su-Jung Kim, Euiseong Kim, Sunil Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title | Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title_full | Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title_short | Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells |
title_sort | comparison of biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers and epoxy resin-based sealer on human periodontal ligament stem cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7699603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33233519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13225242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohhanseul comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT kimegan comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT leesukjoon comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT parksoyeon comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT chendongzi comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT shinsujung comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT kimeuiseong comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells AT kimsunil comparisonofbiocompatibilityofcalciumsilicatebasedsealersandepoxyresinbasedsealeronhumanperiodontalligamentstemcells |