Cargando…

The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China

We measured the health resource agglomeration capacities of 31 Chinese provinces (or municipalities) in 2004–2018 based on the entropy weight method. Using a modified spatial gravity model, we constructed and analyzed the spatial correlation network of these health resource agglomeration capacities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Qingbin, Luo, Kang, Hu, Ruodi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33238597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228705
_version_ 1783616313350946816
author Guo, Qingbin
Luo, Kang
Hu, Ruodi
author_facet Guo, Qingbin
Luo, Kang
Hu, Ruodi
author_sort Guo, Qingbin
collection PubMed
description We measured the health resource agglomeration capacities of 31 Chinese provinces (or municipalities) in 2004–2018 based on the entropy weight method. Using a modified spatial gravity model, we constructed and analyzed the spatial correlation network of these health resource agglomeration capacities and their influencing factors through social network analysis. We found that: (i) China’s health resource agglomeration capacity had a gradual strengthening trend, with capacity weakening from east to west (strongest in the eastern region, second strongest in the central region, and weakest in the western region). (ii) The spatial network of such capacities became more densely connected, and the network density and level (efficiency) showed an upward (downward) trend. (iii) In terms of centrality, the high-ranking provinces (or municipalities) were Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shandong, Hunan, Hubei, Fujian, Anhui, Jiangxi, and Tianjin, while the low-ranking were Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xinjiang, Hainan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi. (iv) Block 1 (eight provinces or municipalities), including Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, had a “net spillover” effect in the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities; Block 2, (seven provinces or municipalities), including Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, had a “bidirectional spillover” effect in the spatial network; Block 3 (seven provinces or municipalities), including Anhui, Hubei, and Hunan, had a “mediator” effect in the network; and Block 4, (nine provinces or municipalities), including Sichuan, Guizhou, and Tibet, had a “net beneficial” effect in the network. (v) The economic development, urbanization wage, and financial health expenditure levels, and population size had significant positive correlations with the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities. Policy recommendations to enhance the radiating role of health resources in core provinces (or municipalities), rationally allocate health resources, and transform ideas to support public health resource services were provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7700579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77005792020-11-30 The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China Guo, Qingbin Luo, Kang Hu, Ruodi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We measured the health resource agglomeration capacities of 31 Chinese provinces (or municipalities) in 2004–2018 based on the entropy weight method. Using a modified spatial gravity model, we constructed and analyzed the spatial correlation network of these health resource agglomeration capacities and their influencing factors through social network analysis. We found that: (i) China’s health resource agglomeration capacity had a gradual strengthening trend, with capacity weakening from east to west (strongest in the eastern region, second strongest in the central region, and weakest in the western region). (ii) The spatial network of such capacities became more densely connected, and the network density and level (efficiency) showed an upward (downward) trend. (iii) In terms of centrality, the high-ranking provinces (or municipalities) were Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shandong, Hunan, Hubei, Fujian, Anhui, Jiangxi, and Tianjin, while the low-ranking were Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Yunnan, Guizhou, Xinjiang, Hainan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi. (iv) Block 1 (eight provinces or municipalities), including Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, had a “net spillover” effect in the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities; Block 2, (seven provinces or municipalities), including Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, had a “bidirectional spillover” effect in the spatial network; Block 3 (seven provinces or municipalities), including Anhui, Hubei, and Hunan, had a “mediator” effect in the network; and Block 4, (nine provinces or municipalities), including Sichuan, Guizhou, and Tibet, had a “net beneficial” effect in the network. (v) The economic development, urbanization wage, and financial health expenditure levels, and population size had significant positive correlations with the spatial network of health resource agglomeration capacities. Policy recommendations to enhance the radiating role of health resources in core provinces (or municipalities), rationally allocate health resources, and transform ideas to support public health resource services were provided. MDPI 2020-11-23 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7700579/ /pubmed/33238597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228705 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Qingbin
Luo, Kang
Hu, Ruodi
The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title_full The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title_fullStr The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title_short The Spatial Correlations of Health Resource Agglomeration Capacities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from China
title_sort spatial correlations of health resource agglomeration capacities and their influencing factors: evidence from china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33238597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228705
work_keys_str_mv AT guoqingbin thespatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina
AT luokang thespatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina
AT huruodi thespatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina
AT guoqingbin spatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina
AT luokang spatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina
AT huruodi spatialcorrelationsofhealthresourceagglomerationcapacitiesandtheirinfluencingfactorsevidencefromchina