Cargando…
Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center
SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the most severe postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a leakage of the anastomosis created between the remnant esophagus and the stomach. There is substantial debate on which surgical technique and which stapler are the best....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113474 |
_version_ | 1783616326216974336 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Dolores T. Babic, Benjamin Herbst, Veronika Gebauer, Florian Schlößer, Hans Schiffmann, Lars Chon, Seung-Hun Schröder, Wolfgang Bruns, Christiane J. Fuchs, Hans F |
author_facet | Müller, Dolores T. Babic, Benjamin Herbst, Veronika Gebauer, Florian Schlößer, Hans Schiffmann, Lars Chon, Seung-Hun Schröder, Wolfgang Bruns, Christiane J. Fuchs, Hans F |
author_sort | Müller, Dolores T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the most severe postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a leakage of the anastomosis created between the remnant esophagus and the stomach. There is substantial debate on which surgical technique and which stapler are the best. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively. Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient and may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction. ABSTRACT: Anastomotic leak is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is therefore considered a benchmark for the quality of surgery for esophageal cancer. There is substantial debate on which anastomotic technique is the best for patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Our standardized technique is a circular stapled anastomosis with either a 25 or 28 mm anvil. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively (p = 0.0925). Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient. Stapler size may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7700634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77006342020-11-30 Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center Müller, Dolores T. Babic, Benjamin Herbst, Veronika Gebauer, Florian Schlößer, Hans Schiffmann, Lars Chon, Seung-Hun Schröder, Wolfgang Bruns, Christiane J. Fuchs, Hans F Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: One of the most severe postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a leakage of the anastomosis created between the remnant esophagus and the stomach. There is substantial debate on which surgical technique and which stapler are the best. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively. Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient and may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction. ABSTRACT: Anastomotic leak is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is therefore considered a benchmark for the quality of surgery for esophageal cancer. There is substantial debate on which anastomotic technique is the best for patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Our standardized technique is a circular stapled anastomosis with either a 25 or 28 mm anvil. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze whether the stapler diameter had an impact on postoperative anastomotic leak rates during a 4-year time frame from 2016 to 2020. A total of 632 patients (open, hybrid, and totally minimally invasive esophagectomy) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 214 patients underwent an anastomosis with a 25 mm stapler vs. 418 patients with a 28 mm stapler. Anastomotic leak rates were 15.4% vs. 10.8%, respectively (p = 0.0925). Stapler size should be chosen according to the individual anatomical situation of the patient. Stapler size may be of higher relevance in patients undergoing totally minimally invasive reconstruction. MDPI 2020-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7700634/ /pubmed/33266414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113474 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Müller, Dolores T. Babic, Benjamin Herbst, Veronika Gebauer, Florian Schlößer, Hans Schiffmann, Lars Chon, Seung-Hun Schröder, Wolfgang Bruns, Christiane J. Fuchs, Hans F Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title | Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title_full | Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title_fullStr | Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title_short | Does Circular Stapler Size in Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer Affect Anastomotic Leak Rate? 4-Year Experience of a European High-Volume Center |
title_sort | does circular stapler size in surgical management of esophageal cancer affect anastomotic leak rate? 4-year experience of a european high-volume center |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerdolorest doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT babicbenjamin doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT herbstveronika doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT gebauerflorian doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT schloßerhans doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT schiffmannlars doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT chonseunghun doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT schroderwolfgang doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT brunschristianej doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter AT fuchshansf doescircularstaplersizeinsurgicalmanagementofesophagealcanceraffectanastomoticleakrate4yearexperienceofaeuropeanhighvolumecenter |