Cargando…

Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the types of human chewing simulator described in scientific literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus. The search strategy included 10 search terms: “in vitro”; “dental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soriano-Valero, Sergio, Román-Rodriguez, Juan-Luis, Agustín-Panadero, Rubén, Bellot-Arcís, Carlos, Fons-Font, Antonio, Fernández-Estevan, Lucía
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57279
_version_ 1783616355392552960
author Soriano-Valero, Sergio
Román-Rodriguez, Juan-Luis
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Bellot-Arcís, Carlos
Fons-Font, Antonio
Fernández-Estevan, Lucía
author_facet Soriano-Valero, Sergio
Román-Rodriguez, Juan-Luis
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Bellot-Arcís, Carlos
Fons-Font, Antonio
Fernández-Estevan, Lucía
author_sort Soriano-Valero, Sergio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the types of human chewing simulator described in scientific literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus. The search strategy included 10 search terms: “in vitro”; “dental materials”; “shear strength”; “fatigue fracture”; “bite force”; “prosthetic materials”; “chewing simulator”; “chewing machine”; “simulated mastication”; and “dental wear simulator.” Two researchers worked independently to assess the titles and abstracts of the articles. The quality of the in vitro trials selected was evaluated by means of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials scale. RESULTS: The electronic search identified 80 articles related to the topic of interest. After reading the full texts, ten works were selected. The articles focused mainly on the design of chewing simulators. Most of them were considered of moderate quality. Regarding the characteristics that an ideal chewing simulator should encompass, the devices described in articles varied greatly in terms of movement, periodontal ligament simulation, force sensors, and the materials tested. CONCLUSIONS: No chewing simulator offers all the characteristics necessary to reproduce human masticatory movements and forces under the humidity and pH conditions of the oral cavity. A simulator that encompasses all these characteristics would make it possible to standardize trials involving simulated mastication. Key words:In vitro, dental materials, dental wear simulator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7700780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77007802020-12-04 Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies Soriano-Valero, Sergio Román-Rodriguez, Juan-Luis Agustín-Panadero, Rubén Bellot-Arcís, Carlos Fons-Font, Antonio Fernández-Estevan, Lucía J Clin Exp Dent Review BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the types of human chewing simulator described in scientific literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus. The search strategy included 10 search terms: “in vitro”; “dental materials”; “shear strength”; “fatigue fracture”; “bite force”; “prosthetic materials”; “chewing simulator”; “chewing machine”; “simulated mastication”; and “dental wear simulator.” Two researchers worked independently to assess the titles and abstracts of the articles. The quality of the in vitro trials selected was evaluated by means of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials scale. RESULTS: The electronic search identified 80 articles related to the topic of interest. After reading the full texts, ten works were selected. The articles focused mainly on the design of chewing simulators. Most of them were considered of moderate quality. Regarding the characteristics that an ideal chewing simulator should encompass, the devices described in articles varied greatly in terms of movement, periodontal ligament simulation, force sensors, and the materials tested. CONCLUSIONS: No chewing simulator offers all the characteristics necessary to reproduce human masticatory movements and forces under the humidity and pH conditions of the oral cavity. A simulator that encompasses all these characteristics would make it possible to standardize trials involving simulated mastication. Key words:In vitro, dental materials, dental wear simulator. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7700780/ /pubmed/33282141 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57279 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Soriano-Valero, Sergio
Román-Rodriguez, Juan-Luis
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Bellot-Arcís, Carlos
Fons-Font, Antonio
Fernández-Estevan, Lucía
Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title_full Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title_fullStr Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title_short Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
title_sort systematic review of chewing simulators: reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282141
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57279
work_keys_str_mv AT sorianovalerosergio systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies
AT romanrodriguezjuanluis systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies
AT agustinpanaderoruben systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies
AT bellotarciscarlos systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies
AT fonsfontantonio systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies
AT fernandezestevanlucia systematicreviewofchewingsimulatorsrealityandreproducibilityofinvitrostudies