Cargando…

Validation Study of Korean Translated Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation-15 as Self-Report Family Assessment Measure: Focusing on Adolescent in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province

BACKGROUND: Systemic Clinic Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15) is a compact scale that contains the most critical family function assessment tools including assessments of the strengths, adaptability, and communication among family members. It has been translated into other languages in the U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shine, Bo-Kyung, Park, Young-Jin, Ahn, Byung-Wook, Bae, Jaekyoung, Park, Ju-Seong, Han, Seong-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32418394
http://dx.doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.19.0076
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Systemic Clinic Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15) is a compact scale that contains the most critical family function assessment tools including assessments of the strengths, adaptability, and communication among family members. It has been translated into other languages in the United States and Europe. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of SCORE-15 with a small research population and justify its applicability in Korea. METHODS: SCORE-15 is a self-reporting family function measurement tool for each family member over the age of 11 years. This study used the Family Communication Scale (FCS) included in the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES) IV package and FACES in FACES-III to verify the validity of the Korean-translated SCORE-15. Cronbach’s α value was calculated to check the reliability of SCORE-15. Data were analyzed using STATA ver. 15.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS: The study analyzed the correlation between FACES-III and SCORE-15 and FCS and SCORE-15 so that there was a significant static correlation in both comparisons (r=0.72 and r=0.81, respectively). Also, the research compared each subscale to analyze the correlation and the range was 0.47 to 0.95. The total SCORE-15 Cronbach’s α value was 0.92 and those values of the subscales for family strengths, family communication, and family difficulty were 0.89, 0.73, and 0.87, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study was the first to validate the Korean SCORE-15, which can be used as an appropriate short-form indicator for evaluating family function and changes in detecting therapeutic improvements in Korea.