Cargando…

Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences between internal target volumes (ITVs) contoured on the simulation 4DCT and daily 4DCBCT images for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determine the dose delivered on 4D planning technique. METHODS: For nine patients, 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumas, Michael, Laugeman, Eric, Sevak, Parag, Snyder, Karen C., Mao, Weihua, Chetty, Indrin J., Ajlouni, Munther, Wen, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13041
_version_ 1783616389026676736
author Dumas, Michael
Laugeman, Eric
Sevak, Parag
Snyder, Karen C.
Mao, Weihua
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ajlouni, Munther
Wen, Ning
author_facet Dumas, Michael
Laugeman, Eric
Sevak, Parag
Snyder, Karen C.
Mao, Weihua
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ajlouni, Munther
Wen, Ning
author_sort Dumas, Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the differences between internal target volumes (ITVs) contoured on the simulation 4DCT and daily 4DCBCT images for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determine the dose delivered on 4D planning technique. METHODS: For nine patients, 4DCBCTs were acquired before each fraction to assess tumor motion. An ITV was contoured on each phase of the 4DCBCT and a union of the 10 ITVs was used to create a composite ITV. Another ITV was drawn on the average 3DCBCT (avgCBCT) to compare with current clinical practice. The Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and center of mass (COM) were averaged over four fractions to compare the ITVs contoured on the 4DCT, avgCBCT, and 4DCBCT for each patient. Planning was done on the average CT, and using the online registration, plans were calculated on each phase of the 4DCBCT and on the avgCBCT. Plan dose calculations were tested by measuring ion chamber dose in the CIRS lung phantom. RESULTS: The Dice coefficients were similar for all three comparisons: avgCBCT‐to‐4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), 4DCT‐to‐avgCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), and 4DCT‐to‐4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1); while the mean COM differences were also comparable (2.6 ± 2.2mm, 2.3 ± 1.4mm, and 3.1 ± 1.1mm, respectively). The Hausdorff distances for the comparisons with 4DCBCT (8.2 ± 2.9mm and 8.1 ± 3.2mm) were larger than the comparison without (6.5 ± 2.5mm). The differences in ITV D95% between the treatment plan and avgCBCT calculations were 4.3 ± 3.0% and −0.5 ± 4.6%, between treatment plan and 4DCBCT plans, respectively, while the ITV V100% coverages were 99.0 ± 1.9% and 93.1 ± 8.0% for avgCBCT and 4DCBCT, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is great potential for 4DCBCT to evaluate the extent of tumor motion before treatment, but image quality challenges the clinician to consistently delineate lung target volumes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7700943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77009432020-12-03 Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Dumas, Michael Laugeman, Eric Sevak, Parag Snyder, Karen C. Mao, Weihua Chetty, Indrin J. Ajlouni, Munther Wen, Ning J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: To investigate the differences between internal target volumes (ITVs) contoured on the simulation 4DCT and daily 4DCBCT images for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determine the dose delivered on 4D planning technique. METHODS: For nine patients, 4DCBCTs were acquired before each fraction to assess tumor motion. An ITV was contoured on each phase of the 4DCBCT and a union of the 10 ITVs was used to create a composite ITV. Another ITV was drawn on the average 3DCBCT (avgCBCT) to compare with current clinical practice. The Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and center of mass (COM) were averaged over four fractions to compare the ITVs contoured on the 4DCT, avgCBCT, and 4DCBCT for each patient. Planning was done on the average CT, and using the online registration, plans were calculated on each phase of the 4DCBCT and on the avgCBCT. Plan dose calculations were tested by measuring ion chamber dose in the CIRS lung phantom. RESULTS: The Dice coefficients were similar for all three comparisons: avgCBCT‐to‐4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), 4DCT‐to‐avgCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), and 4DCT‐to‐4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1); while the mean COM differences were also comparable (2.6 ± 2.2mm, 2.3 ± 1.4mm, and 3.1 ± 1.1mm, respectively). The Hausdorff distances for the comparisons with 4DCBCT (8.2 ± 2.9mm and 8.1 ± 3.2mm) were larger than the comparison without (6.5 ± 2.5mm). The differences in ITV D95% between the treatment plan and avgCBCT calculations were 4.3 ± 3.0% and −0.5 ± 4.6%, between treatment plan and 4DCBCT plans, respectively, while the ITV V100% coverages were 99.0 ± 1.9% and 93.1 ± 8.0% for avgCBCT and 4DCBCT, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is great potential for 4DCBCT to evaluate the extent of tumor motion before treatment, but image quality challenges the clinician to consistently delineate lung target volumes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7700943/ /pubmed/33044040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13041 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Dumas, Michael
Laugeman, Eric
Sevak, Parag
Snyder, Karen C.
Mao, Weihua
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ajlouni, Munther
Wen, Ning
Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_full Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_fullStr Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_full_unstemmed Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_short Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_sort technical note: comparison of the internal target volume (itv) contours and dose calculations on 4dct, average cbct, and 4dcbct imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt)
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13041
work_keys_str_mv AT dumasmichael technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT laugemaneric technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT sevakparag technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT snyderkarenc technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT maoweihua technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT chettyindrinj technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT ajlounimunther technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT wenning technicalnotecomparisonoftheinternaltargetvolumeitvcontoursanddosecalculationson4dctaveragecbctand4dcbctimagingforlungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt