Cargando…
Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf col...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053 |
_version_ | 1783616389254217728 |
---|---|
author | Chow, Vivian U. Y. Kan, Monica W. K. Chan, Anthony T. C. |
author_facet | Chow, Vivian U. Y. Kan, Monica W. K. Chan, Anthony T. C. |
author_sort | Chow, Vivian U. Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter‐free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root‐mean‐square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma‐index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient‐specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement‐based machine‐specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7700944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77009442020-12-03 Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Chow, Vivian U. Y. Kan, Monica W. K. Chan, Anthony T. C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter‐free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root‐mean‐square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma‐index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient‐specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement‐based machine‐specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7700944/ /pubmed/33073897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Chow, Vivian U. Y. Kan, Monica W. K. Chan, Anthony T. C. Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title | Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title_full | Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title_fullStr | Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title_short | Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) |
title_sort | patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowvivianuy patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt AT kanmonicawk patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt AT chananthonytc patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt |