Cargando…

Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Vivian U. Y., Kan, Monica W. K., Chan, Anthony T. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053
_version_ 1783616389254217728
author Chow, Vivian U. Y.
Kan, Monica W. K.
Chan, Anthony T. C.
author_facet Chow, Vivian U. Y.
Kan, Monica W. K.
Chan, Anthony T. C.
author_sort Chow, Vivian U. Y.
collection PubMed
description An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter‐free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root‐mean‐square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma‐index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient‐specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement‐based machine‐specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7700944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77009442020-12-03 Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Chow, Vivian U. Y. Kan, Monica W. K. Chan, Anthony T. C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An in‐house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter‐free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root‐mean‐square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma‐index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient‐specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement‐based machine‐specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7700944/ /pubmed/33073897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chow, Vivian U. Y.
Kan, Monica W. K.
Chan, Anthony T. C.
Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_full Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_fullStr Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_full_unstemmed Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_short Patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
title_sort patient‐specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt)
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7700944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13053
work_keys_str_mv AT chowvivianuy patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT kanmonicawk patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt
AT chananthonytc patientspecificqualityassuranceusingmachinelogfilesanalysisforstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrt