Cargando…
Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model
PURPOSE: After closure of laparotomies, sutures may pull through tissue due to too high intra-abdominal pressure or suture tension, resulting in burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The objective of this study was to measure the suture tension in small and large bites with a new suture material. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32086634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7 |
_version_ | 1783616416080986112 |
---|---|
author | Yurtkap, Y. den Hartog, F. P. J. van Weteringen, W. Jeekel, J. Kleinrensink, G. J. Lange, J. F. |
author_facet | Yurtkap, Y. den Hartog, F. P. J. van Weteringen, W. Jeekel, J. Kleinrensink, G. J. Lange, J. F. |
author_sort | Yurtkap, Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: After closure of laparotomies, sutures may pull through tissue due to too high intra-abdominal pressure or suture tension, resulting in burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The objective of this study was to measure the suture tension in small and large bites with a new suture material. METHODS: Closure of the linea alba was performed with small bites (i.e., 5 mm between two consecutive stitches and 5 mm distance from the incision) and large bites (i.e., 10 mm × 10 mm) with Duramesh™ size 0 (2 mm) and PDS II 2-0 in 24 experiments on six porcine abdominal walls. The abdominal wall was fixated on an artificial computer-controlled insufflatable abdomen, known as the ‘AbdoMan’. A custom-made suture tension sensor was placed in the middle of the incision. RESULTS: The suture tension was significantly lower with the small bites technique and Duramesh™ when compared with large bites (small bites 0.12 N (IQR 0.07–0.19) vs. large bites 0.57 N (IQR 0.23–0.92), p < 0.025). This significant difference was also found in favour of the small bites with PDS II 2-0 (p < 0.038). No macroscopic tissue failure was seen during or after the experiments. CONCLUSION: Closure of the abdominal wall with the small bites technique and Duramesh(™) was more efficient in dividing suture tension across the incision when compared to large bites. However, suture tension compared to a conventional suture material was not significantly different, contradicting an advantage of the new suture material in the prevention of burst abdomen and incisional hernia during the acute, postoperative phase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7701069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77010692020-12-03 Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model Yurtkap, Y. den Hartog, F. P. J. van Weteringen, W. Jeekel, J. Kleinrensink, G. J. Lange, J. F. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: After closure of laparotomies, sutures may pull through tissue due to too high intra-abdominal pressure or suture tension, resulting in burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The objective of this study was to measure the suture tension in small and large bites with a new suture material. METHODS: Closure of the linea alba was performed with small bites (i.e., 5 mm between two consecutive stitches and 5 mm distance from the incision) and large bites (i.e., 10 mm × 10 mm) with Duramesh™ size 0 (2 mm) and PDS II 2-0 in 24 experiments on six porcine abdominal walls. The abdominal wall was fixated on an artificial computer-controlled insufflatable abdomen, known as the ‘AbdoMan’. A custom-made suture tension sensor was placed in the middle of the incision. RESULTS: The suture tension was significantly lower with the small bites technique and Duramesh™ when compared with large bites (small bites 0.12 N (IQR 0.07–0.19) vs. large bites 0.57 N (IQR 0.23–0.92), p < 0.025). This significant difference was also found in favour of the small bites with PDS II 2-0 (p < 0.038). No macroscopic tissue failure was seen during or after the experiments. CONCLUSION: Closure of the abdominal wall with the small bites technique and Duramesh(™) was more efficient in dividing suture tension across the incision when compared to large bites. However, suture tension compared to a conventional suture material was not significantly different, contradicting an advantage of the new suture material in the prevention of burst abdomen and incisional hernia during the acute, postoperative phase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Paris 2020-02-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7701069/ /pubmed/32086634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yurtkap, Y. den Hartog, F. P. J. van Weteringen, W. Jeekel, J. Kleinrensink, G. J. Lange, J. F. Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title | Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title_full | Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title_short | Evaluation of a new suture material (Duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
title_sort | evaluation of a new suture material (duramesh™) by measuring suture tension in small and large bites techniques for laparotomy closure in a porcine model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32086634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yurtkapy evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel AT denhartogfpj evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel AT vanweteringenw evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel AT jeekelj evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel AT kleinrensinkgj evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel AT langejf evaluationofanewsuturematerialdurameshbymeasuringsuturetensioninsmallandlargebitestechniquesforlaparotomyclosureinaporcinemodel |