Cargando…

In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials

PURPOSE: Two innovative reinforced biologic materials were studied in a non-human primate hernia repair model. The test articles, which combine layers of ovine decellularized extracellular matrix with minimal amounts of synthetic polymer, were evaluated for their biologic performance as measured by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overbeck, N., Nagvajara, G. M., Ferzoco, S., May, B. C. H., Beierschmitt, A., Qi, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02119-z
_version_ 1783616418195963904
author Overbeck, N.
Nagvajara, G. M.
Ferzoco, S.
May, B. C. H.
Beierschmitt, A.
Qi, S.
author_facet Overbeck, N.
Nagvajara, G. M.
Ferzoco, S.
May, B. C. H.
Beierschmitt, A.
Qi, S.
author_sort Overbeck, N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Two innovative reinforced biologic materials were studied in a non-human primate hernia repair model. The test articles, which combine layers of ovine decellularized extracellular matrix with minimal amounts of synthetic polymer, were evaluated for their biologic performance as measured by inflammatory response, healing kinetics, integration, and remodeling into functional host tissue. For comparison, seven clinically used biologic and synthetic meshes were also studied. METHODS: Animals were implanted with test articles in surgically created full-thickness midline abdominal wall defects, and evaluated macroscopically and histologically at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Macroscopically, biologics resorbed and remodeled into naturally appearing tissue; the reinforced biologics appeared similar, but remodeled earlier and were less prone to stretch. Synthetics developed a layer of reactive tissue above and separate from the contracted mesh structure. At early time points, the collagen networks of biologics and reinforced biologics were infiltrated by host cells primarily as a peripheral layer on the biologics. As early as 12 weeks, the collagen networks associated with the reinforced biologics remodeled into organized host collagen. By 24 weeks, both reinforced biologics and biologics had low levels of inflammation. In contrast, a foreign body response persisted at 24 weeks with the synthetics, which had developed less organized collagen, separate in space from the actual mesh. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows a favorable response to reinforced biologics, which were associated with an initial inflammatory response, resolving by later time points, followed by active remodeling, and the formation of new morphologically functional collagen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-019-02119-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7701079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77010792020-12-03 In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials Overbeck, N. Nagvajara, G. M. Ferzoco, S. May, B. C. H. Beierschmitt, A. Qi, S. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: Two innovative reinforced biologic materials were studied in a non-human primate hernia repair model. The test articles, which combine layers of ovine decellularized extracellular matrix with minimal amounts of synthetic polymer, were evaluated for their biologic performance as measured by inflammatory response, healing kinetics, integration, and remodeling into functional host tissue. For comparison, seven clinically used biologic and synthetic meshes were also studied. METHODS: Animals were implanted with test articles in surgically created full-thickness midline abdominal wall defects, and evaluated macroscopically and histologically at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Macroscopically, biologics resorbed and remodeled into naturally appearing tissue; the reinforced biologics appeared similar, but remodeled earlier and were less prone to stretch. Synthetics developed a layer of reactive tissue above and separate from the contracted mesh structure. At early time points, the collagen networks of biologics and reinforced biologics were infiltrated by host cells primarily as a peripheral layer on the biologics. As early as 12 weeks, the collagen networks associated with the reinforced biologics remodeled into organized host collagen. By 24 weeks, both reinforced biologics and biologics had low levels of inflammation. In contrast, a foreign body response persisted at 24 weeks with the synthetics, which had developed less organized collagen, separate in space from the actual mesh. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows a favorable response to reinforced biologics, which were associated with an initial inflammatory response, resolving by later time points, followed by active remodeling, and the formation of new morphologically functional collagen. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-019-02119-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Paris 2020-01-31 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7701079/ /pubmed/32006122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02119-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Overbeck, N.
Nagvajara, G. M.
Ferzoco, S.
May, B. C. H.
Beierschmitt, A.
Qi, S.
In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title_full In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title_fullStr In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title_full_unstemmed In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title_short In-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
title_sort in-vivo evaluation of a reinforced ovine biologic: a comparative study to available hernia mesh repair materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02119-z
work_keys_str_mv AT overbeckn invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials
AT nagvajaragm invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials
AT ferzocos invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials
AT maybch invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials
AT beierschmitta invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials
AT qis invivoevaluationofareinforcedovinebiologicacomparativestudytoavailableherniameshrepairmaterials