Cargando…
Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031 |
_version_ | 1783616423861420032 |
---|---|
author | Turchan, William Tyler Arya, Ritu Hight, Robert Al‐Hallaq, Hania Dominello, Michael Joyce, Dan McCabe, Bradley P. McCall, Anne R. Perevalova, Eugenia Stepaniak, Christopher Yenice, Kamil Burmeister, Jay Golden, Daniel W. |
author_facet | Turchan, William Tyler Arya, Ritu Hight, Robert Al‐Hallaq, Hania Dominello, Michael Joyce, Dan McCabe, Bradley P. McCall, Anne R. Perevalova, Eugenia Stepaniak, Christopher Yenice, Kamil Burmeister, Jay Golden, Daniel W. |
author_sort | Turchan, William Tyler |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physicists and/or dosimetrists and are not routinely reviewed by treating physicians. METHODS: An anonymous, internet‐based survey of medical physicists and dosimetrists was distributed via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. Participants were asked to characterize standard practices for completion and review of OAR contouring, target volume contouring, and image registration at their institution along with their personal training in these areas and level of comfort performing these tasks. Likert‐type scales are reported as Median [Interquartile range] with scores ranging from 1 = “Extremely/All of the time” to 5 = “Not at all/Never.” RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐seven individuals responded to the survey. Overall, respondents indicated significantly less frequent physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3]), and less confidence in the thoroughness of physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3], P < 0.01) of OAR contours compared to image registration. Only 19% (95% CI 14–24%) of respondents reported a formal process by which OAR volumes are reviewed by physicians in their clinic. The presence of a formal review process was also associated with significantly higher perceived thoroughness of review of OAR volumes compared to clinics with no formal review process (2 [2–3] vs 3 [2–4], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite the critical role of OAR delineation and image registration in the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning process, physician review of these tasks is not always optimal. Radiotherapy clinics should consider implementation of formal processes to promote adequate physician review of OARs and image registrations to ensure the quality and safety of radiotherapy treatment plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7701106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77011062020-12-03 Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation Turchan, William Tyler Arya, Ritu Hight, Robert Al‐Hallaq, Hania Dominello, Michael Joyce, Dan McCabe, Bradley P. McCall, Anne R. Perevalova, Eugenia Stepaniak, Christopher Yenice, Kamil Burmeister, Jay Golden, Daniel W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physicists and/or dosimetrists and are not routinely reviewed by treating physicians. METHODS: An anonymous, internet‐based survey of medical physicists and dosimetrists was distributed via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. Participants were asked to characterize standard practices for completion and review of OAR contouring, target volume contouring, and image registration at their institution along with their personal training in these areas and level of comfort performing these tasks. Likert‐type scales are reported as Median [Interquartile range] with scores ranging from 1 = “Extremely/All of the time” to 5 = “Not at all/Never.” RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐seven individuals responded to the survey. Overall, respondents indicated significantly less frequent physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3]), and less confidence in the thoroughness of physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3], P < 0.01) of OAR contours compared to image registration. Only 19% (95% CI 14–24%) of respondents reported a formal process by which OAR volumes are reviewed by physicians in their clinic. The presence of a formal review process was also associated with significantly higher perceived thoroughness of review of OAR volumes compared to clinics with no formal review process (2 [2–3] vs 3 [2–4], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite the critical role of OAR delineation and image registration in the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning process, physician review of these tasks is not always optimal. Radiotherapy clinics should consider implementation of formal processes to promote adequate physician review of OARs and image registrations to ensure the quality and safety of radiotherapy treatment plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7701106/ /pubmed/32986307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Turchan, William Tyler Arya, Ritu Hight, Robert Al‐Hallaq, Hania Dominello, Michael Joyce, Dan McCabe, Bradley P. McCall, Anne R. Perevalova, Eugenia Stepaniak, Christopher Yenice, Kamil Burmeister, Jay Golden, Daniel W. Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title | Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title_full | Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title_fullStr | Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title_full_unstemmed | Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title_short | Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
title_sort | physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turchanwilliamtyler physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT aryaritu physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT hightrobert physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT alhallaqhania physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT dominellomichael physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT joycedan physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT mccabebradleyp physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT mccallanner physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT perevalovaeugenia physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT stepaniakchristopher physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT yenicekamil physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT burmeisterjay physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation AT goldendanielw physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation |