Cargando…

Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation

INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turchan, William Tyler, Arya, Ritu, Hight, Robert, Al‐Hallaq, Hania, Dominello, Michael, Joyce, Dan, McCabe, Bradley P., McCall, Anne R., Perevalova, Eugenia, Stepaniak, Christopher, Yenice, Kamil, Burmeister, Jay, Golden, Daniel W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031
_version_ 1783616423861420032
author Turchan, William Tyler
Arya, Ritu
Hight, Robert
Al‐Hallaq, Hania
Dominello, Michael
Joyce, Dan
McCabe, Bradley P.
McCall, Anne R.
Perevalova, Eugenia
Stepaniak, Christopher
Yenice, Kamil
Burmeister, Jay
Golden, Daniel W.
author_facet Turchan, William Tyler
Arya, Ritu
Hight, Robert
Al‐Hallaq, Hania
Dominello, Michael
Joyce, Dan
McCabe, Bradley P.
McCall, Anne R.
Perevalova, Eugenia
Stepaniak, Christopher
Yenice, Kamil
Burmeister, Jay
Golden, Daniel W.
author_sort Turchan, William Tyler
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physicists and/or dosimetrists and are not routinely reviewed by treating physicians. METHODS: An anonymous, internet‐based survey of medical physicists and dosimetrists was distributed via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. Participants were asked to characterize standard practices for completion and review of OAR contouring, target volume contouring, and image registration at their institution along with their personal training in these areas and level of comfort performing these tasks. Likert‐type scales are reported as Median [Interquartile range] with scores ranging from 1 = “Extremely/All of the time” to 5 = “Not at all/Never.” RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐seven individuals responded to the survey. Overall, respondents indicated significantly less frequent physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3]), and less confidence in the thoroughness of physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3], P < 0.01) of OAR contours compared to image registration. Only 19% (95% CI 14–24%) of respondents reported a formal process by which OAR volumes are reviewed by physicians in their clinic. The presence of a formal review process was also associated with significantly higher perceived thoroughness of review of OAR volumes compared to clinics with no formal review process (2 [2–3] vs 3 [2–4], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite the critical role of OAR delineation and image registration in the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning process, physician review of these tasks is not always optimal. Radiotherapy clinics should consider implementation of formal processes to promote adequate physician review of OARs and image registrations to ensure the quality and safety of radiotherapy treatment plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7701106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77011062020-12-03 Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation Turchan, William Tyler Arya, Ritu Hight, Robert Al‐Hallaq, Hania Dominello, Michael Joyce, Dan McCabe, Bradley P. McCall, Anne R. Perevalova, Eugenia Stepaniak, Christopher Yenice, Kamil Burmeister, Jay Golden, Daniel W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics INTRODUCTION: Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physicists and/or dosimetrists and are not routinely reviewed by treating physicians. METHODS: An anonymous, internet‐based survey of medical physicists and dosimetrists was distributed via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. Participants were asked to characterize standard practices for completion and review of OAR contouring, target volume contouring, and image registration at their institution along with their personal training in these areas and level of comfort performing these tasks. Likert‐type scales are reported as Median [Interquartile range] with scores ranging from 1 = “Extremely/All of the time” to 5 = “Not at all/Never.” RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety‐seven individuals responded to the survey. Overall, respondents indicated significantly less frequent physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3]), and less confidence in the thoroughness of physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3], P < 0.01) of OAR contours compared to image registration. Only 19% (95% CI 14–24%) of respondents reported a formal process by which OAR volumes are reviewed by physicians in their clinic. The presence of a formal review process was also associated with significantly higher perceived thoroughness of review of OAR volumes compared to clinics with no formal review process (2 [2–3] vs 3 [2–4], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite the critical role of OAR delineation and image registration in the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning process, physician review of these tasks is not always optimal. Radiotherapy clinics should consider implementation of formal processes to promote adequate physician review of OARs and image registrations to ensure the quality and safety of radiotherapy treatment plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7701106/ /pubmed/32986307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Turchan, William Tyler
Arya, Ritu
Hight, Robert
Al‐Hallaq, Hania
Dominello, Michael
Joyce, Dan
McCabe, Bradley P.
McCall, Anne R.
Perevalova, Eugenia
Stepaniak, Christopher
Yenice, Kamil
Burmeister, Jay
Golden, Daniel W.
Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title_full Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title_fullStr Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title_full_unstemmed Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title_short Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
title_sort physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32986307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13031
work_keys_str_mv AT turchanwilliamtyler physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT aryaritu physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT hightrobert physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT alhallaqhania physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT dominellomichael physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT joycedan physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT mccabebradleyp physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT mccallanner physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT perevalovaeugenia physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT stepaniakchristopher physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT yenicekamil physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT burmeisterjay physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation
AT goldendanielw physicianreviewofimageregistrationandnormalstructuredelineation