Cargando…

Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a function of gadolinium contrast dose using a retrospective reader study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained prior to the start of this study and was HIPAA compliant. One‐hundred and fifty MR b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Thuy‐My Thi, McDonald, Elizabeth S., Isaac, Gamaliel, Rosen, Mark A., Dougherty, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13010
_version_ 1783616424094203904
author Le, Thuy‐My Thi
McDonald, Elizabeth S.
Isaac, Gamaliel
Rosen, Mark A.
Dougherty, Lawrence
author_facet Le, Thuy‐My Thi
McDonald, Elizabeth S.
Isaac, Gamaliel
Rosen, Mark A.
Dougherty, Lawrence
author_sort Le, Thuy‐My Thi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a function of gadolinium contrast dose using a retrospective reader study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained prior to the start of this study and was HIPAA compliant. One‐hundred and fifty MR breast examinations were included that were acquired between January 2001 and December 2006. Seventy‐five patients received contrast doses (gadopentetate dimeglumine) by weight of 0.10 mmol/kg and 75 patients were imaged using fixed volumes of 20 ml. The images were assessed by two radiologists with performance calculated for each reader as well as a combined assessment. Dose response was measured by comparing performance between cases binned by dose: <=0.10; >0.10; and >0.13 mmol/kg. Statistical significance was calculated using a one‐sided Z‐test for differences in proportions with interobserver agreement calculated using Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: In the combined reader assessment with equivocal lesions classified as negative, sensitivity rose from 66% (19/29) to 92% (24/26, P < 0.01) and 95% (18/19, P < 0.01) with the specificity also increasing from 65% (32/49) to 87% (40/46, P < 0.01) and 86% (32/37, P = 0.01) corresponding to doses <=0.10, >0.10, >0.13 mmol/kg. With equivocal lesions classified as positive, sensitivity rose from 79% (23/29) to 92% (24/26, P < 0.10) and 95% (18/19, P < 0.10) Specificity also increased from 53% (26/49) to 72% (33/46, P < 0.05) and 70% (26/37, P = 0.05) with increasing dose. Interobserver agreement also improved at the higher doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7701107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77011072020-12-03 Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging Le, Thuy‐My Thi McDonald, Elizabeth S. Isaac, Gamaliel Rosen, Mark A. Dougherty, Lawrence J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a function of gadolinium contrast dose using a retrospective reader study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained prior to the start of this study and was HIPAA compliant. One‐hundred and fifty MR breast examinations were included that were acquired between January 2001 and December 2006. Seventy‐five patients received contrast doses (gadopentetate dimeglumine) by weight of 0.10 mmol/kg and 75 patients were imaged using fixed volumes of 20 ml. The images were assessed by two radiologists with performance calculated for each reader as well as a combined assessment. Dose response was measured by comparing performance between cases binned by dose: <=0.10; >0.10; and >0.13 mmol/kg. Statistical significance was calculated using a one‐sided Z‐test for differences in proportions with interobserver agreement calculated using Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: In the combined reader assessment with equivocal lesions classified as negative, sensitivity rose from 66% (19/29) to 92% (24/26, P < 0.01) and 95% (18/19, P < 0.01) with the specificity also increasing from 65% (32/49) to 87% (40/46, P < 0.01) and 86% (32/37, P = 0.01) corresponding to doses <=0.10, >0.10, >0.13 mmol/kg. With equivocal lesions classified as positive, sensitivity rose from 79% (23/29) to 92% (24/26, P < 0.10) and 95% (18/19, P < 0.10) Specificity also increased from 53% (26/49) to 72% (33/46, P < 0.05) and 70% (26/37, P = 0.05) with increasing dose. Interobserver agreement also improved at the higher doses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7701107/ /pubmed/33089949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13010 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Le, Thuy‐My Thi
McDonald, Elizabeth S.
Isaac, Gamaliel
Rosen, Mark A.
Dougherty, Lawrence
Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title_full Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title_fullStr Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title_full_unstemmed Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title_short Effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in DCE‐MR breast imaging
title_sort effect of contrast dose on diagnostic performance in dce‐mr breast imaging
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13010
work_keys_str_mv AT lethuymythi effectofcontrastdoseondiagnosticperformanceindcemrbreastimaging
AT mcdonaldelizabeths effectofcontrastdoseondiagnosticperformanceindcemrbreastimaging
AT isaacgamaliel effectofcontrastdoseondiagnosticperformanceindcemrbreastimaging
AT rosenmarka effectofcontrastdoseondiagnosticperformanceindcemrbreastimaging
AT doughertylawrence effectofcontrastdoseondiagnosticperformanceindcemrbreastimaging