Cargando…

Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging

Comprehensive characterization of geometric distortions for MRI simulators and MRI‐guided treatment delivery systems is typically performed with large phantoms that are costly and unwieldy to handle. Here we propose an easily implementable methodology for MR distortion determination of the entire im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schüler, Emil, Mallozzi, Richard, Levy, Joshua, Hristov, Dimitre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13065
_version_ 1783616425552773120
author Schüler, Emil
Mallozzi, Richard
Levy, Joshua
Hristov, Dimitre
author_facet Schüler, Emil
Mallozzi, Richard
Levy, Joshua
Hristov, Dimitre
author_sort Schüler, Emil
collection PubMed
description Comprehensive characterization of geometric distortions for MRI simulators and MRI‐guided treatment delivery systems is typically performed with large phantoms that are costly and unwieldy to handle. Here we propose an easily implementable methodology for MR distortion determination of the entire imaging space of the scanner through the use of a compact commercially available distortion phantom. The MagphanRT phantom was scanned at several locations within a MR scanner. From each scan, an approximate location of the phantom was determined from a subset of the fiducial spheres. The fiducial displacements were determined, and a displacement field was fitted to the displacement data using the entire multi‐scan data set. An orthogonal polynomial expansion fitting function was used that had been augmented to include independent rigid‐body transformations for each scan. The rigid‐body portions of the displacement field were thereafter discarded, and the resultant fit then represented the distortion field. Multi‐positional scans of the phantom were used successfully to determine the distortion field with extended coverage. A single scan of the phantom covered 20 cm in its smallest dimension. By stitching together overlapping scans we extended the distortion measurements to 30 cm. No information about the absolute location or orientation of each scan was required. The method, termed the Multi‐Scan Expansion (MSE) method, can be easily applied for larger field‐of‐views (FOVs) by using a combination of larger phantom displacements and more scans. The implementation of the MSE method allows for distortion determination beyond the physical limitations of the phantom. The method is scalable to the user’s needs and does not require any specialized equipment. This approach could open up for easier determination of the distortion magnitude at distances further from the scanner’s isocenter. This is especially important in the newly proposed methodologies of MR‐only simulation in RT and in adaptive replanning in MR linac systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7701113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77011132020-12-03 Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging Schüler, Emil Mallozzi, Richard Levy, Joshua Hristov, Dimitre J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Comprehensive characterization of geometric distortions for MRI simulators and MRI‐guided treatment delivery systems is typically performed with large phantoms that are costly and unwieldy to handle. Here we propose an easily implementable methodology for MR distortion determination of the entire imaging space of the scanner through the use of a compact commercially available distortion phantom. The MagphanRT phantom was scanned at several locations within a MR scanner. From each scan, an approximate location of the phantom was determined from a subset of the fiducial spheres. The fiducial displacements were determined, and a displacement field was fitted to the displacement data using the entire multi‐scan data set. An orthogonal polynomial expansion fitting function was used that had been augmented to include independent rigid‐body transformations for each scan. The rigid‐body portions of the displacement field were thereafter discarded, and the resultant fit then represented the distortion field. Multi‐positional scans of the phantom were used successfully to determine the distortion field with extended coverage. A single scan of the phantom covered 20 cm in its smallest dimension. By stitching together overlapping scans we extended the distortion measurements to 30 cm. No information about the absolute location or orientation of each scan was required. The method, termed the Multi‐Scan Expansion (MSE) method, can be easily applied for larger field‐of‐views (FOVs) by using a combination of larger phantom displacements and more scans. The implementation of the MSE method allows for distortion determination beyond the physical limitations of the phantom. The method is scalable to the user’s needs and does not require any specialized equipment. This approach could open up for easier determination of the distortion magnitude at distances further from the scanner’s isocenter. This is especially important in the newly proposed methodologies of MR‐only simulation in RT and in adaptive replanning in MR linac systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7701113/ /pubmed/33073909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13065 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Schüler, Emil
Mallozzi, Richard
Levy, Joshua
Hristov, Dimitre
Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title_full Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title_fullStr Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title_full_unstemmed Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title_short Technical Note: Extended field‐of‐view (FOV) MRI distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
title_sort technical note: extended field‐of‐view (fov) mri distortion determination through multi‐positional phantom imaging
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13065
work_keys_str_mv AT schuleremil technicalnoteextendedfieldofviewfovmridistortiondeterminationthroughmultipositionalphantomimaging
AT mallozzirichard technicalnoteextendedfieldofviewfovmridistortiondeterminationthroughmultipositionalphantomimaging
AT levyjoshua technicalnoteextendedfieldofviewfovmridistortiondeterminationthroughmultipositionalphantomimaging
AT hristovdimitre technicalnoteextendedfieldofviewfovmridistortiondeterminationthroughmultipositionalphantomimaging