Effectiveness of an Innovative Cognitive Treatment and Telerehabilitation on Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the potential usefulness of cognitive training procedures in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have received increased attention. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the face-to-face cognitive virtual reality rehabilitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manenti, Rosa, Gobbi, Elena, Baglio, Francesca, Macis, Ambra, Ferrari, Clarissa, Pagnoni, Ilaria, Rossetto, Federica, Di Tella, Sonia, Alemanno, Federica, Cimino, Vincenzo, Binetti, Giuliano, Iannaccone, Sandro, Bramanti, Placido, Cappa, Stefano F., Cotelli, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Neuroscience
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.585988
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In recent years, the potential usefulness of cognitive training procedures in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have received increased attention. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the face-to-face cognitive virtual reality rehabilitation system (VRRS) and to compare it to that of face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual for individuals with MCI. Moreover, we assessed the possibility of prolonging the effects of treatment with a telerehabilitation system. METHODS: A total of 49 subjects with MCI were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups in a randomized controlled trial design: (a) those who received face-to-face cognitive VRRS (12 sessions of individualized cognitive rehabilitation over 4 weeks) followed by telerehabilitation (36 sessions of home-based cognitive VRRS training, three sessions for week); (b) those who received face-to-face cognitive VRRS followed by at-home unstructured cognitive stimulation (36 sessions of home-based unstructured cognitive stimulation, three sessions for week); and (c) those who received face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual (12 sessions of face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual). RESULTS: An improvement in memory, language and visuo-constructional abilities was observed after the end of face-to-face VRRS treatment compared to face-to-face treatment as usual. The application of home-based cognitive VRRS telerehabilitation seems to induce more maintenance of the obtained gains than home-based unstructured stimulation. DISCUSSION: The present study provides preliminary evidence in support of individualized VRRS treatment and telerehabilitation delivery for cognitive rehabilitation and should pave the way for future studies aiming at identifying optimal cognitive treatment protocols in subjects with MCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03486704.

Ejemplares similares