Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review

Treatment of multiple malignant solid tumours with programmed death (PD)‐1/PD ligand (PD‐L) 1 inhibitors has been reported. However, the efficacy and immune adverse effects of combination therapies are controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed with PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE and C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Qigu, Gu, Lihu, Su, Rong, Chen, Bangsheng, Cao, Hongcui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15991
_version_ 1783616486826311680
author Yao, Qigu
Gu, Lihu
Su, Rong
Chen, Bangsheng
Cao, Hongcui
author_facet Yao, Qigu
Gu, Lihu
Su, Rong
Chen, Bangsheng
Cao, Hongcui
author_sort Yao, Qigu
collection PubMed
description Treatment of multiple malignant solid tumours with programmed death (PD)‐1/PD ligand (PD‐L) 1 inhibitors has been reported. However, the efficacy and immune adverse effects of combination therapies are controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed with PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from their inception until January 2020. Random‐effect model was adopted because of relatively high heterogeneity. We also calculated hazard ratio (HR) of progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs), the incidence of grade 3‐5 AEs by tumour subgroup, therapeutic schedules and therapy lines. Nineteen articles were selected using the search strategy for meta‐analysis. Combined PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors prolonged OS and PFS (HR 0.72, P < 0.001) and (HR 0.66, P < 0.001). In addition, incidence of all‐grade and grade 3‐5 AEs was not significant in the two subgroup analyses (HR 1.01, P = 0.31) and (HR 1.10, P = 0.07), respectively. Our meta‐analysis indicated that combination therapy with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors had greater clinical benefits and adverse events were not increased significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7701512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77015122020-12-08 Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review Yao, Qigu Gu, Lihu Su, Rong Chen, Bangsheng Cao, Hongcui J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Treatment of multiple malignant solid tumours with programmed death (PD)‐1/PD ligand (PD‐L) 1 inhibitors has been reported. However, the efficacy and immune adverse effects of combination therapies are controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed with PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from their inception until January 2020. Random‐effect model was adopted because of relatively high heterogeneity. We also calculated hazard ratio (HR) of progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs), the incidence of grade 3‐5 AEs by tumour subgroup, therapeutic schedules and therapy lines. Nineteen articles were selected using the search strategy for meta‐analysis. Combined PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors prolonged OS and PFS (HR 0.72, P < 0.001) and (HR 0.66, P < 0.001). In addition, incidence of all‐grade and grade 3‐5 AEs was not significant in the two subgroup analyses (HR 1.01, P = 0.31) and (HR 1.10, P = 0.07), respectively. Our meta‐analysis indicated that combination therapy with PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors had greater clinical benefits and adverse events were not increased significantly. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-20 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7701512/ /pubmed/33078904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15991 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yao, Qigu
Gu, Lihu
Su, Rong
Chen, Bangsheng
Cao, Hongcui
Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title_full Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title_short Efficacy and safety of combination PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: A systematic review
title_sort efficacy and safety of combination pd‐1/pd‐l1 checkpoint inhibitors for malignant solid tumours: a systematic review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7701512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15991
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoqigu efficacyandsafetyofcombinationpd1pdl1checkpointinhibitorsformalignantsolidtumoursasystematicreview
AT gulihu efficacyandsafetyofcombinationpd1pdl1checkpointinhibitorsformalignantsolidtumoursasystematicreview
AT surong efficacyandsafetyofcombinationpd1pdl1checkpointinhibitorsformalignantsolidtumoursasystematicreview
AT chenbangsheng efficacyandsafetyofcombinationpd1pdl1checkpointinhibitorsformalignantsolidtumoursasystematicreview
AT caohongcui efficacyandsafetyofcombinationpd1pdl1checkpointinhibitorsformalignantsolidtumoursasystematicreview