Cargando…

Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction

Protein‐surface interactions are exploited in various processes in life sciences and biotechnology. Many of such processes are performed in presence of a buffer system, which is generally believed to have an influence on the protein‐surface interaction but is rarely investigated systematically. Comb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bag, Saientan, Rauwolf, Stefan, Suyetin, Mikhail, Schwaminger, Sebastian P., Wenzel, Wolfgang, Berensmeier, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7702087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32794279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000572
_version_ 1783616543059345408
author Bag, Saientan
Rauwolf, Stefan
Suyetin, Mikhail
Schwaminger, Sebastian P.
Wenzel, Wolfgang
Berensmeier, Sonja
author_facet Bag, Saientan
Rauwolf, Stefan
Suyetin, Mikhail
Schwaminger, Sebastian P.
Wenzel, Wolfgang
Berensmeier, Sonja
author_sort Bag, Saientan
collection PubMed
description Protein‐surface interactions are exploited in various processes in life sciences and biotechnology. Many of such processes are performed in presence of a buffer system, which is generally believed to have an influence on the protein‐surface interaction but is rarely investigated systematically. Combining experimental and theoretical methodologies, we herein demonstrate the strong influence of the buffer type on protein‐surface interactions. Using state of the art chromatographic experiments, we measure the interaction between individual amino acids and silica, as a reference to understand protein‐surface interactions. Among all the 20 proteinogenic amino acids studied, we found that arginine (R) and lysine (K) bind most strongly to silica, a finding validated by free energy calculations. We further measured the binding of R and K at different pH in presence of two different buffers, MOPS (3‐(N‐morpholino)propanesulfonic acid) and TRIS (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane), and find dramatically different behavior. In presence of TRIS, the binding affinity of R/K increases with pH, whereas we observe an opposite trend for MOPS. These results can be understood using a multiscale modelling framework combining molecular dynamics simulation and Langmuir adsorption model. The modelling approach helps to optimize buffer conditions in various fields like biosensors, drug delivery or bio separation engineering prior to the experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7702087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77020872020-12-14 Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction Bag, Saientan Rauwolf, Stefan Suyetin, Mikhail Schwaminger, Sebastian P. Wenzel, Wolfgang Berensmeier, Sonja Chemphyschem Articles Protein‐surface interactions are exploited in various processes in life sciences and biotechnology. Many of such processes are performed in presence of a buffer system, which is generally believed to have an influence on the protein‐surface interaction but is rarely investigated systematically. Combining experimental and theoretical methodologies, we herein demonstrate the strong influence of the buffer type on protein‐surface interactions. Using state of the art chromatographic experiments, we measure the interaction between individual amino acids and silica, as a reference to understand protein‐surface interactions. Among all the 20 proteinogenic amino acids studied, we found that arginine (R) and lysine (K) bind most strongly to silica, a finding validated by free energy calculations. We further measured the binding of R and K at different pH in presence of two different buffers, MOPS (3‐(N‐morpholino)propanesulfonic acid) and TRIS (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane), and find dramatically different behavior. In presence of TRIS, the binding affinity of R/K increases with pH, whereas we observe an opposite trend for MOPS. These results can be understood using a multiscale modelling framework combining molecular dynamics simulation and Langmuir adsorption model. The modelling approach helps to optimize buffer conditions in various fields like biosensors, drug delivery or bio separation engineering prior to the experiment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-23 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7702087/ /pubmed/32794279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000572 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Bag, Saientan
Rauwolf, Stefan
Suyetin, Mikhail
Schwaminger, Sebastian P.
Wenzel, Wolfgang
Berensmeier, Sonja
Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title_full Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title_fullStr Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title_short Buffer Influence on the Amino Acid Silica Interaction
title_sort buffer influence on the amino acid silica interaction
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7702087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32794279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000572
work_keys_str_mv AT bagsaientan bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction
AT rauwolfstefan bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction
AT suyetinmikhail bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction
AT schwamingersebastianp bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction
AT wenzelwolfgang bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction
AT berensmeiersonja bufferinfluenceontheaminoacidsilicainteraction