Cargando…

Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains

Vibrio cholerae isolates responsible for cholera pandemics represent only a small portion of the diverse strains belonging to this species. Indeed, most V. cholerae are encountered in aquatic environments. To better understand the emergence of pandemic lineages, it is crucial to discern what differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drebes Dörr, Natália C., Blokesch, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7702109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15224
_version_ 1783616548249796608
author Drebes Dörr, Natália C.
Blokesch, Melanie
author_facet Drebes Dörr, Natália C.
Blokesch, Melanie
author_sort Drebes Dörr, Natália C.
collection PubMed
description Vibrio cholerae isolates responsible for cholera pandemics represent only a small portion of the diverse strains belonging to this species. Indeed, most V. cholerae are encountered in aquatic environments. To better understand the emergence of pandemic lineages, it is crucial to discern what differentiates pandemic strains from their environmental relatives. Here, we studied the interaction of environmental V. cholerae with eukaryotic predators or competing bacteria and tested the contributions of the haemolysin and the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to those interactions. Both of these molecular weapons are constitutively active in environmental isolates but subject to tight regulation in the pandemic clade. We showed that several environmental isolates resist amoebal grazing and that this anti‐grazing defense relies on the strains' T6SS and its actincross‐linking domain (ACD)‐containing tip protein. Strains lacking the ACD were unable to defend themselves against grazing amoebae but maintained high levels of T6SS‐dependent interbacterial killing. We explored the latter phenotype through whole‐genome sequencing of 14 isolates, which unveiled a wide array of novel T6SS effector and (orphan) immunity proteins. By combining these in silico predictions with experimental validations, we showed that highly similar but non‐identical immunity proteins were insufficient to provide cross‐immunity among those wild strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7702109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77021092020-12-14 Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains Drebes Dörr, Natália C. Blokesch, Melanie Environ Microbiol Research Articles Vibrio cholerae isolates responsible for cholera pandemics represent only a small portion of the diverse strains belonging to this species. Indeed, most V. cholerae are encountered in aquatic environments. To better understand the emergence of pandemic lineages, it is crucial to discern what differentiates pandemic strains from their environmental relatives. Here, we studied the interaction of environmental V. cholerae with eukaryotic predators or competing bacteria and tested the contributions of the haemolysin and the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to those interactions. Both of these molecular weapons are constitutively active in environmental isolates but subject to tight regulation in the pandemic clade. We showed that several environmental isolates resist amoebal grazing and that this anti‐grazing defense relies on the strains' T6SS and its actincross‐linking domain (ACD)‐containing tip protein. Strains lacking the ACD were unable to defend themselves against grazing amoebae but maintained high levels of T6SS‐dependent interbacterial killing. We explored the latter phenotype through whole‐genome sequencing of 14 isolates, which unveiled a wide array of novel T6SS effector and (orphan) immunity proteins. By combining these in silico predictions with experimental validations, we showed that highly similar but non‐identical immunity proteins were insufficient to provide cross‐immunity among those wild strains. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-10-02 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7702109/ /pubmed/32885535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15224 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Drebes Dörr, Natália C.
Blokesch, Melanie
Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title_full Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title_fullStr Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title_full_unstemmed Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title_short Interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains
title_sort interbacterial competition and anti‐predatory behaviour of environmental vibrio cholerae strains
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7702109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15224
work_keys_str_mv AT drebesdorrnataliac interbacterialcompetitionandantipredatorybehaviourofenvironmentalvibriocholeraestrains
AT blokeschmelanie interbacterialcompetitionandantipredatorybehaviourofenvironmentalvibriocholeraestrains