Cargando…
Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group
INTRODUCTION: The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed. Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035738 |
_version_ | 1783616633927892992 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Zihan Dickens, Andrew P Chi, Chunhua Kong, Xia Enocson, Alexandra Adab, Peymane Cheng, Kar Keung Sitch, Alice J Jowett, Sue Jordan, Rachel |
author_facet | Pan, Zihan Dickens, Andrew P Chi, Chunhua Kong, Xia Enocson, Alexandra Adab, Peymane Cheng, Kar Keung Sitch, Alice J Jowett, Sue Jordan, Rachel |
author_sort | Pan, Zihan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed. Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it is not known which strategy would be the most suitable for adoption in primary care. Studies have been conducted to test the accuracy of questionnaires, expiratory peak flow meters and microspirometers to screen for COPD, but no study has directly evaluated and compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these methods in the Chinese setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We present the protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study, to be conducted in eight community hospitals from four cities among Chinese adults aged 40 years or older to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different case-finding methods for COPD, and determine the test performance of individual and combinations of screening tests and strategies in comparison with quality diagnostic spirometry. Index tests are screening questionnaires (COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk Questionnaire (CAPTURE), symptom-based questionnaire, COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ)), microspirometer and peak flow. Each participant will complete all of these tests in one assessment. The primary analysis will compare the performance of a screening questionnaire with a handheld device. Secondary analyses will include the comparative performance of each index test, as well as a comparison of strategies where we use a screening questionnaire and a handheld device. Approximately 2000 participants will be recruited over 9 to 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Peking University Hospital and University of Birmingham. All study participants will provide written informed consent. Study results will be published in appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various community/stakeholder engagement activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13357135. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7703419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77034192020-12-09 Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group Pan, Zihan Dickens, Andrew P Chi, Chunhua Kong, Xia Enocson, Alexandra Adab, Peymane Cheng, Kar Keung Sitch, Alice J Jowett, Sue Jordan, Rachel BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: The latest chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) epidemiology survey in China estimated that there were 99 million potential COPD patients in the country, the majority of whom are undiagnosed. Screening for COPD in primary care settings is of vital importance for China, but it is not known which strategy would be the most suitable for adoption in primary care. Studies have been conducted to test the accuracy of questionnaires, expiratory peak flow meters and microspirometers to screen for COPD, but no study has directly evaluated and compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these methods in the Chinese setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We present the protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study, to be conducted in eight community hospitals from four cities among Chinese adults aged 40 years or older to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different case-finding methods for COPD, and determine the test performance of individual and combinations of screening tests and strategies in comparison with quality diagnostic spirometry. Index tests are screening questionnaires (COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care To Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk Questionnaire (CAPTURE), symptom-based questionnaire, COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ)), microspirometer and peak flow. Each participant will complete all of these tests in one assessment. The primary analysis will compare the performance of a screening questionnaire with a handheld device. Secondary analyses will include the comparative performance of each index test, as well as a comparison of strategies where we use a screening questionnaire and a handheld device. Approximately 2000 participants will be recruited over 9 to 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Peking University Hospital and University of Birmingham. All study participants will provide written informed consent. Study results will be published in appropriate journal and presented at national and international conferences, as well as relevant social media and various community/stakeholder engagement activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13357135. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7703419/ /pubmed/33247005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035738 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Pan, Zihan Dickens, Andrew P Chi, Chunhua Kong, Xia Enocson, Alexandra Adab, Peymane Cheng, Kar Keung Sitch, Alice J Jowett, Sue Jordan, Rachel Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title | Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title_full | Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title_fullStr | Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title_full_unstemmed | Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title_short | Study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in China: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the Breathe Well group |
title_sort | study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed copd among residents (≥40 years) in four cities in china: protocol for a multicentre cross-sectional study on behalf of the breathe well group |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panzihan studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT dickensandrewp studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT chichunhua studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT kongxia studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT enocsonalexandra studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT adabpeymane studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT chengkarkeung studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT sitchalicej studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT jowettsue studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT jordanrachel studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup AT studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofdifferentscreeningstrategiesforidentifyingundiagnosedcopdamongresidents40yearsinfourcitiesinchinaprotocolforamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonbehalfofthebreathewellgroup |