Cargando…

Einführung zur Qualität von Medizinjournalismus und erste Einschätzungen zur COVID-19-Berichterstattung

The media landscape is subject to constant change; innovative media technologies increasingly influence the world we live in. While digital media are increasingly being consumed by all age groups and laypersons frequently obtain information on health and medical topics on the Internet, the question...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daube, Dominik, Ruhrmann, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33252701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03249-x
Descripción
Sumario:The media landscape is subject to constant change; innovative media technologies increasingly influence the world we live in. While digital media are increasingly being consumed by all age groups and laypersons frequently obtain information on health and medical topics on the Internet, the question of the quality of (journalistic) content on the Web arises. The roles of journalists are changing and scientists are experiencing new opportunities and challenges in the digital distribution of research results. Which qualitative requirements have to be met by these contents and which potentials and opportunities, but also risks, do online disseminated and received information entail? This article describes the topics of medical and health communication and the processes of journalistic reporting. Subsequently, we discuss the criterion of “evidence,” which is already established in medicine, as a possible approach to the evaluation of health-relevant and medical information. Finally, we discuss the corona pandemic in the context of growing media populism.