Cargando…
A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health?
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in changes to the working arrangements of millions of employees who are now based at home and may continue to work at home, in some capacity, for the foreseeable future. Decisions on how to promote employees’ health whilst working at home...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z |
_version_ | 1783616654852227072 |
---|---|
author | Oakman, Jodi Kinsman, Natasha Stuckey, Rwth Graham, Melissa Weale, Victoria |
author_facet | Oakman, Jodi Kinsman, Natasha Stuckey, Rwth Graham, Melissa Weale, Victoria |
author_sort | Oakman, Jodi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in changes to the working arrangements of millions of employees who are now based at home and may continue to work at home, in some capacity, for the foreseeable future. Decisions on how to promote employees’ health whilst working at home (WAH) need to be based on the best available evidence to optimise worker outcomes. The aim of this rapid review was to review the impact of WAH on individual workers’ mental and physical health, and determine any gender difference, to develop recommendations for employers and employees to optimise workers’ health. METHOD: A search was undertaken in three databases, PsychInfo, ProQuest, and Web of Science, from 2007 to May 2020. Selection criteria included studies which involved employees who regularly worked at home, and specifically reported on physical or mental health-related outcomes. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, one author extracted data and conducted risk of bias assessments with review by a second author. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers meet the selection criteria for this review. Ten health outcomes were reported: pain, self-reported health, safety, well-being, stress, depression, fatigue, quality of life, strain and happiness. The impact on health outcomes was strongly influenced by the degree of organisational support available to employees, colleague support, social connectedness (outside of work), and levels of work to family conflict. Overall, women were less likely to experience improved health outcomes when WAH. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several health outcomes affected by WAH. The health/work relationship is complex and requires consideration of broader system factors to optimise the effects of WAH on workers’ health. It is likely mandated WAH will continue to some degree for the foreseeable future; organisations will need to implement formalised WAH policies that consider work-home boundary management support, role clarity, workload, performance indicators, technical support, facilitation of co-worker networking, and training for managers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7703513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77035132020-12-01 A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? Oakman, Jodi Kinsman, Natasha Stuckey, Rwth Graham, Melissa Weale, Victoria BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in changes to the working arrangements of millions of employees who are now based at home and may continue to work at home, in some capacity, for the foreseeable future. Decisions on how to promote employees’ health whilst working at home (WAH) need to be based on the best available evidence to optimise worker outcomes. The aim of this rapid review was to review the impact of WAH on individual workers’ mental and physical health, and determine any gender difference, to develop recommendations for employers and employees to optimise workers’ health. METHOD: A search was undertaken in three databases, PsychInfo, ProQuest, and Web of Science, from 2007 to May 2020. Selection criteria included studies which involved employees who regularly worked at home, and specifically reported on physical or mental health-related outcomes. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, one author extracted data and conducted risk of bias assessments with review by a second author. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers meet the selection criteria for this review. Ten health outcomes were reported: pain, self-reported health, safety, well-being, stress, depression, fatigue, quality of life, strain and happiness. The impact on health outcomes was strongly influenced by the degree of organisational support available to employees, colleague support, social connectedness (outside of work), and levels of work to family conflict. Overall, women were less likely to experience improved health outcomes when WAH. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified several health outcomes affected by WAH. The health/work relationship is complex and requires consideration of broader system factors to optimise the effects of WAH on workers’ health. It is likely mandated WAH will continue to some degree for the foreseeable future; organisations will need to implement formalised WAH policies that consider work-home boundary management support, role clarity, workload, performance indicators, technical support, facilitation of co-worker networking, and training for managers. BioMed Central 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7703513/ /pubmed/33256652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oakman, Jodi Kinsman, Natasha Stuckey, Rwth Graham, Melissa Weale, Victoria A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title | A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title_full | A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title_fullStr | A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title_full_unstemmed | A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title_short | A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
title_sort | rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oakmanjodi arapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT kinsmannatasha arapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT stuckeyrwth arapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT grahammelissa arapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT wealevictoria arapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT oakmanjodi rapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT kinsmannatasha rapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT stuckeyrwth rapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT grahammelissa rapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth AT wealevictoria rapidreviewofmentalandphysicalhealtheffectsofworkingathomehowdoweoptimisehealth |