Cargando…

Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan, Kohmongkoludom, Pasawang, Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn, Horthongkham, Navin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925
_version_ 1783616710121619456
author Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan
Kohmongkoludom, Pasawang
Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn
Horthongkham, Navin
author_facet Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan
Kohmongkoludom, Pasawang
Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn
Horthongkham, Navin
author_sort Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7703886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77038862020-12-03 Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan Kohmongkoludom, Pasawang Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn Horthongkham, Navin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups. Public Library of Science 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7703886/ /pubmed/33253306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925 Text en © 2020 Wongyingsinn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wongyingsinn, Mingkwan
Kohmongkoludom, Pasawang
Trakarnsanga, Atthaphorn
Horthongkham, Navin
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925
work_keys_str_mv AT wongyingsinnmingkwan postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kohmongkoludompasawang postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT trakarnsangaatthaphorn postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT horthongkhamnavin postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial