Cargando…
Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics
Contact tracing is a public health measure implemented to control the spread and break the chains of transmission of an infectious disease. It is done by identifying, assessing, and managing people who have been exposed to an infectious disease to prevent onward transmission. We summarize findings f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.25986 |
_version_ | 1783616805128896512 |
---|---|
author | Jaca, Anelisa Iwu, Chinwe Juliana Wiysonge, Charles Shey |
author_facet | Jaca, Anelisa Iwu, Chinwe Juliana Wiysonge, Charles Shey |
author_sort | Jaca, Anelisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contact tracing is a public health measure implemented to control the spread and break the chains of transmission of an infectious disease. It is done by identifying, assessing, and managing people who have been exposed to an infectious disease to prevent onward transmission. We summarize findings from a rapid Cochrane review that included cohort and modelling studies to assess the benefits and harms of digital solutions for identifying contacts of confirmed positive cases of an infectious disease. The review included 12 studies, which assessed digital contact tracing for the following infectious diseases: Ebola, tuberculosis, pertussis and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This review revealed low-certainty evidence of a decrease in secondary cases of the targeted infectious disease, if digital contact tracing was used. However, it is uncertain from the currently available evidence whether digital contact tracing would produce more reliable counts of contacts and reduce the time taken to complete contact tracing. Therefore, implementation of digital contact tracing in the context of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic in African countries should be accompanied by a robust monitoring and evaluation framework. There should be an evaluation and documentation of the benefits, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, equity impacts, and unintended consequences of the intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7704351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77043512020-12-07 Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics Jaca, Anelisa Iwu, Chinwe Juliana Wiysonge, Charles Shey Pan Afr Med J Commentary Contact tracing is a public health measure implemented to control the spread and break the chains of transmission of an infectious disease. It is done by identifying, assessing, and managing people who have been exposed to an infectious disease to prevent onward transmission. We summarize findings from a rapid Cochrane review that included cohort and modelling studies to assess the benefits and harms of digital solutions for identifying contacts of confirmed positive cases of an infectious disease. The review included 12 studies, which assessed digital contact tracing for the following infectious diseases: Ebola, tuberculosis, pertussis and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This review revealed low-certainty evidence of a decrease in secondary cases of the targeted infectious disease, if digital contact tracing was used. However, it is uncertain from the currently available evidence whether digital contact tracing would produce more reliable counts of contacts and reduce the time taken to complete contact tracing. Therefore, implementation of digital contact tracing in the context of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic in African countries should be accompanied by a robust monitoring and evaluation framework. There should be an evaluation and documentation of the benefits, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, equity impacts, and unintended consequences of the intervention. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2020-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7704351/ /pubmed/33294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.25986 Text en Copyright: Anelisa Jaca et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Jaca, Anelisa Iwu, Chinwe Juliana Wiysonge, Charles Shey Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title | Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title_full | Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title_fullStr | Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title_short | Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
title_sort | cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294109 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.1.25986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacaanelisa cochranecornerdigitalcontacttracingtechnologiesinepidemics AT iwuchinwejuliana cochranecornerdigitalcontacttracingtechnologiesinepidemics AT wiysongecharlesshey cochranecornerdigitalcontacttracingtechnologiesinepidemics |