Cargando…

Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)

OBJECTIVES: The Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ) is a patient-completed tool designed to assess patient experiences and satisfaction with aspects associated with being involved in a clinical trial. Originally developed in oncology and among English-speaking participants, the aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greene, Alison, Elmer, Mary, Ludlam, Sean, Shay, Kathyjo, Bentley, Sarah, Trennery, Claire, Grimes, Rebecca, Gater, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32691362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3
_version_ 1783616831814107136
author Greene, Alison
Elmer, Mary
Ludlam, Sean
Shay, Kathyjo
Bentley, Sarah
Trennery, Claire
Grimes, Rebecca
Gater, Adam
author_facet Greene, Alison
Elmer, Mary
Ludlam, Sean
Shay, Kathyjo
Bentley, Sarah
Trennery, Claire
Grimes, Rebecca
Gater, Adam
author_sort Greene, Alison
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ) is a patient-completed tool designed to assess patient experiences and satisfaction with aspects associated with being involved in a clinical trial. Originally developed in oncology and among English-speaking participants, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the content and cross-cultural validity of the SPFQ in other indications and non-English-speaking countries. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 80 participants across eight non-English-speaking countries (in Europe, South America and Asia) who had received an investigational medicinal product as part of a clinical trial in the past three years. Interviews comprised concept elicitation to identify concepts of importance to participants’ trial experiences, and cognitive debriefing to assess understanding and perceived importance of SPFQ instructions, items and response options. RESULTS: Concept elicitation findings supported the content validity of the SPFQ. During cognitive debriefing, SPFQ instructions and the majority of items were well understood by participants. Participants generally considered the SPFQ items important to their clinical trial experience, albeit a handful of items assessed concepts that had not been experienced by trial participants or were redundant with other SPFQ items. The instructions, response options and recall period of the SPFQ were generally well understood. No country-level differences in understanding or importance were apparent. CONCLUSION: Study findings provide evidence for the content and cross-cultural validity of the SPFQ and support implementation of the SPFQ as a means of obtaining participant feedback across global development programmes in a variety of indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7704515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77045152020-12-03 Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ) Greene, Alison Elmer, Mary Ludlam, Sean Shay, Kathyjo Bentley, Sarah Trennery, Claire Grimes, Rebecca Gater, Adam Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: The Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ) is a patient-completed tool designed to assess patient experiences and satisfaction with aspects associated with being involved in a clinical trial. Originally developed in oncology and among English-speaking participants, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the content and cross-cultural validity of the SPFQ in other indications and non-English-speaking countries. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 80 participants across eight non-English-speaking countries (in Europe, South America and Asia) who had received an investigational medicinal product as part of a clinical trial in the past three years. Interviews comprised concept elicitation to identify concepts of importance to participants’ trial experiences, and cognitive debriefing to assess understanding and perceived importance of SPFQ instructions, items and response options. RESULTS: Concept elicitation findings supported the content validity of the SPFQ. During cognitive debriefing, SPFQ instructions and the majority of items were well understood by participants. Participants generally considered the SPFQ items important to their clinical trial experience, albeit a handful of items assessed concepts that had not been experienced by trial participants or were redundant with other SPFQ items. The instructions, response options and recall period of the SPFQ were generally well understood. No country-level differences in understanding or importance were apparent. CONCLUSION: Study findings provide evidence for the content and cross-cultural validity of the SPFQ and support implementation of the SPFQ as a means of obtaining participant feedback across global development programmes in a variety of indications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7704515/ /pubmed/32691362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Greene, Alison
Elmer, Mary
Ludlam, Sean
Shay, Kathyjo
Bentley, Sarah
Trennery, Claire
Grimes, Rebecca
Gater, Adam
Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title_full Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title_short Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ)
title_sort evaluation of the content validity and cross-cultural validity of the study participant feedback questionnaire (spfq)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7704515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32691362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3
work_keys_str_mv AT greenealison evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT elmermary evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT ludlamsean evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT shaykathyjo evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT bentleysarah evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT trenneryclaire evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT grimesrebecca evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq
AT gateradam evaluationofthecontentvalidityandcrossculturalvalidityofthestudyparticipantfeedbackquestionnairespfq